Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

KN4M 08-05-2004

Expand Messages
  • robalini@aol.com
    Please send as far and wide as possible. Thanks, Robert Sterling Editor, The Konformist http://www.konformist.com
    Message 1 of 1 , Aug 5, 2004
    • 0 Attachment
      Please send as far and wide as possible.

      Robert Sterling
      Editor, The Konformist

      50 Reasons Not to Vote for Bush
      Order at Amazon at:


      Whose Values are Superior?
      Date: Jul 27, 2004
      While Democrats run away from the word "liberal," Bill Clinton
      delineated the distinction between the liberal values of the
      Democratic Party and the conservative values of today's Republican
      By Regis T. Sabol

      What has infuriated me for years is the way the word "liberal" has
      become a dirty word to Republicans and Democrats alike. Republicans
      use it as the equivalent of "Communist" or "Satan worshipper" or,
      most damning of all, "wimp, weakling, wuss." Democrats, afraid of
      being seen as wimps, weaklings, or wusses, have shied away from the
      word as if it were the scarlet letter.

      With all the talk of values during the current presidential campaign,
      George Bush and Dick Cheney use the word "liberal" like a red flag to
      enflame the electoral. John Kerry has the most liberal voting record
      in the Senate, Bush tells his adoring followers, and John Edwards has
      the fourth highest liberal voting record. I often wonder who has
      established the criteria for determining what a liberal voting record

      When the first George Bush ran for president, he gave Democratic
      challenger Michael Dukakis the unkindest cut of all, calling him
      a "card-carrying member of the ACLU." I couldn't help but think of
      Joseph McCarthy waving around sheets of paper that, he declared,
      revealed the names of 247 card-carrying members of the Communist
      Party working in the State Department? Or was it 161? Or 239? The
      number changed every time McCarthy got in front of an audience or a

      Now, its 1988 all over again, or 2000 when son George W. used the
      dreaded L-word to attack his Democratic opponent, Vice President Al
      Gore. Perhaps that's why the Kerry campaign keeps throwing around the
      words "strength" and "values." as if they were some kind of counter-
      mantra. It's almost as if two kids are shouting back at each
      other, "My strength and values can beat your strength and values."

      Bush rode around rural America in a bus these past few weeks telling
      folks that he represents the mainstream moral values of the heartland
      while John Kerry is a Massachusetts liberal who does not hold their
      moral values. The inference is clear: conservatives are moral and
      liberals are immoral. It's typical of the black/white dichotomy
      through which Bush views the world.

      That's why it was so refreshing to hear former President Bill
      Clinton, in his prime-time speech before the Democratic Convention,
      clearly delineate the sharp distinctions between the values of the
      Democratic and Republican Parties. In a performance that Washington
      Post columnist Tom Shales called "simply magnificent, "Clinton made
      clear that the Democratic Party, for the most part, has been the
      Party committed to what the Founding Fathers called "the common good."

      Referring to the Preamble to the Constitution that said the nation's
      purpose was "to create a more perfect union," Clinton cited a litany
      of examples of what the paradoxical notion of "a more perfect union"
      really means. And what it means is a nation committed to the common
      good, a nation that is committed to the democratic ideal of a better
      world for all its citizens, not just the wealthiest and the most

      While Clinton never once used the L-word, the inference was clear.
      While Democrats may avoid the word "liberal," they continue to be the
      voice of liberal values.

      And that started me thinking about the difference between the liberal
      values that Clinton alluded to and the "moral values of the
      heartland" so dearly cherished by the Bush crowd. We should take a
      close look at the moral values of the heartland as they have been
      practiced in the history of this nation.

      Mainstream moral values of the heartland condoned the practice of

      Mainstream moral values of the heartland encouraged the genocide of
      indigenous Americans.

      Mainstream moral values of the heartland held that men had a right to
      beat women but women were not allowed to hold property or have other
      legal protections and were denied the right to vote.

      Mainstream moral values of the heartland allowed parents to beat
      their children and to punish them by denying them food.

      Mainstream moral values of the heartland demeaned Jews and other non-
      Christians, an attitude best expressed in the epithet "New York Jew."

      Mainstream moral values of the heartland held that the poor were to
      blame for their plight in life, even children and the elderly.

      Mainstream moral values of the heartland saw nothing wrong with child

      Mainstream moral values expected coal miners, steel workers, and
      other laborers to work twelve hours a day for wages that kept them
      and their families powerless and mired in poverty.

      By contrast, it was liberal values that ended slavery and forced an
      end to slavery's spawn, segregation. Ironically, the liberal values
      opposed to slavery were espoused by America's first Republican
      president, Abraham Lincoln, while segregation was created by Southern
      Democrats. On the other hand, it was a Southern Democrat, President
      Lyndon B. Johnson, following the lead of John F. Kennedy, another
      Massachusetts Democrat, who put a stake in the heart of segregation.

      It was liberal values that put a halt to the wholesale slaughter of

      It was liberal values that gave women equal protection under the law
      and the right to vote.

      It was liberal values that protected children from abuse and

      It was liberal values that ended the legal practice of anti-Semitism.

      It was liberal values that gave us Social Security and Medicare to
      protect the elderly.

      It was liberal values that gave working men and women the right to
      organize into unions to fight for decent wages and decent working

      Why, then, do George Bush and his supporters believe that the
      purported moral values of the heartland are superior to what they see
      as the corrupt liberal moral values of urban America?

      That other so-called Massachusetts liberal, when he was elected
      president, required every member of his cabinet to read The Guns of
      August, Barbara Tuchman's analysis of how the European powers
      blundered into World War I. He told his cabinet that such
      catastrophic blunders would not occur during his presidency.

      George Bush, by contrast, proudly said that the only book he ever
      reads is the Bible. Now he says he will read the 9/11 Commission
      Report. Or will Andrew Card and Condi Rice tell him what the report
      says? And the cornerstone of Bush's foreign policy, "the Bush
      Doctrine," is the belief that the United States has the right to
      start a pre-emptive war against any nation it views as a threat.

      Kennedy prevented the Cuban missile crisis from escalating into World
      War III.

      Bush started a war under false pretenses that has now made the world
      a much more dangerous place.

      So whose values are morally superior? And is "liberal" such a dirty
      word, after all. As Clinton so aptly put it, "Strength and wisdom are
      not opposing values."

      Frederick Sweet is Professor of Reproductive Biology in Obstetrics
      and Gynecology at Washington University School of Medicine in St.
      Louis. You can email your comments to Fred@...

      Posted Tuesday, July 27, 2004


      Capitol Hill Blue
      Bush Leagues
      Bush Using Drugs to Control Depression, Erratic Behavior
      Editor, Capitol Hill Blue
      Jul 28, 2004, 08:09

      President George W. Bush is taking powerful anti-depressant drugs to
      control his erratic behavior, depression and paranoia, Capitol Hill
      Blue has learned.

      The prescription drugs, administered by Col. Richard J. Tubb, the
      White House physician, can impair the President's mental faculties
      and decrease both his physical capabilities and his ability to
      respond to a crisis, administration aides admit privately.

      "It's a double-edged sword," says one aide. "We can't have him flying
      off the handle at the slightest provocation but we also need a
      President who is alert mentally."

      Angry Bush walked away from reporter's questions.

      Tubb prescribed the anti-depressants after a clearly-upset Bush
      stormed off stage on July 8, refusing to answer reporters' questions
      about his relationship with indicted Enron executive Kenneth J. Lay.

      "Keep those motherfuckers away from me," he screamed at an aide
      backstage. "If you can't, I'll find someone who can."

      Bush's mental stability has become the topic of Washington whispers
      in recent months. Capitol Hill Blue first reported on June 4 about
      increasing concern among White House aides over the President's wide
      mood swings and obscene outbursts.

      Although GOP loyalists dismissed the reports an anti-Bush propaganda,
      the reports were later confirmed by prominent George Washington
      University psychiatrist Dr. Justin Frank in his book Bush on the
      Couch: Inside the Mind of the President. Dr. Frank diagnosed the
      President as a "paranoid meglomaniac" and "untreated alcoholic"
      whose "lifelong streak of sadism, ranging from childhood pranks
      (using firecrackers to explode frogs) to insulting journalists,
      gloating over state executions and pumping his hand gleefully before
      the bombing of Baghdad" showcase Bush's instabilities.

      "I was really very unsettled by him and I started watching everything
      he did and reading what he wrote and watching him on videotape. I
      felt he was disturbed," Dr. Frank said. "He fits the profile of a
      former drinker whose alcoholism has been arrested but not treated."

      Dr. Frank's conclusions have been praised by other prominent
      psychiatrists, including Dr. James Grotstein, Professor at UCLA
      Medical Center, and Dr. Irvin Yalom, MD, Professor Emeritus at
      Stanford University Medical School.

      The doctors also worry about the wisdom of giving powerful anti-
      depressant drugs to a person with a history of chemical dependency.
      Bush is an admitted alcoholic, although he never sought treatment in
      a formal program, and stories about his cocaine use as a younger man
      haunted his campaigns for Texas governor and his first campaign for

      "President Bush is an untreated alcoholic with paranoid and
      megalomaniac tendencies," Dr. Frank adds.

      The White House did not return phone calls seeking comment on this

      Although the exact drugs Bush takes to control his depression and
      behavior are not known, White House sources say they are "powerful
      medications" designed to bring his erratic actions under control.
      While Col. Tubb regularly releases a synopsis of the President's
      annual physical, details of the President's health and any drugs or
      treatment he may receive are not public record and are guarded
      zealously by the secretive cadre of aides that surround the President.

      Veteran White House watchers say the ability to control information
      about Bush's health, either physical or mental, is similar to Ronald
      Reagan's second term when aides managed to conceal the President's
      increasing memory lapses that signaled the onslaught of Alzheimer's

      It also brings back memories of Richard Nixon's final days when the
      soon-to-resign President wondered the halls and talked to portraits
      of former Presidents. The stories didn't emerge until after Nixon
      left office.

      One long-time GOP political consultant who - for obvious reasons -
      asked not to be identified said he is advising his Republican
      Congressional candidates to keep their distance from Bush.

      "We have to face the very real possibility that the President of the
      United States is loony tunes," he says sadly. "That's not good for my
      candidates, it's not good for the party and it's certainly not good
      for the country."


      Lesbian Action Doll
      Goes On Sale
      The Sunday Herald - UK

      An action figure described as the world's first lesbian action doll
      went on sale in the US [recently].

      Bobbie Doll is the first of the dolls from the DYKEdolls series to go
      on sale. The 12-inch tall toy wears a leather jacket, muscle T-shirt
      and a tattoo.

      The dolls are the brainchild of New Yorker Stephanie Prod. The 36-
      year-old came up with the idea while writing her Masters thesis on
      the under-representation of lesbians in popular culture.

      The DYKEdoll figures will sell for $49.95 (about £28) each. But only
      people over 21 can buy the full package priced at $65 (£37). It
      includes accessories such as tiny leather harnesses and miniature

      Bobbie - or Bobbie Rockabilly DYKEdoll, to give her full title - will
      launch on the dykedolls.com website along with her friends, Doc
      Holliday and Diesel Dyke.



      Dr. Len Horowitz' New Book Announced
      From Tetrahedron, LLC
      Health Science Communications for People Around the World


      Release: No.909-DNA/6
      Date Mailed: Aug. 7, 2004
      For Immediate Release
      Contact: Elaine Zacky-208/265-2575; 800/336-9266

      Experts Link Evolution of the Species to Spiritual Renaissance: DNA
      Called "Antennae to God"

      Sandpoint, ID - More than a map of life, DNA processes spirituality
      according to the latest research. A lengthy review of scientific
      achievements in the field of genetics compiled by a team of experts
      indicates that life evolved from spiritual, more than physical,

      Three years of multidisciplinary study by a team of health science,
      mathematics, genetics, and physics experts, indicates that DNA,
      traditionally considered the "blueprint of life," appears more like
      an "antennae to God." Led by internationally known public health
      authority and award winning author, Dr. Leonard Horowitz, the group's
      research, to be published in October, shows that DNA's coiled design,
      vibrating action, and "electrogenetic" function makes spiritual as
      well as physical evolution possible.

      Life's genomes are empowered by waves and particles of energized
      sound and light which, more than chemicals or drugs, switch
      genes "on" or "off." Likewise, genetic inheritance is energetically
      transmitted "bioacoustically and electromagnetically" through special
      water molecules that form the electrogenetic matrix of the "Sacred
      Spiral." These hydroelectric geometric structures-most shaped like
      pyramids, hexagons, and pentagons-direct physical as well as
      spiritual development, according to researchers.

      Metaphysically, water molecules shaped like pyramids relay energy
      messages to and from DNA. These signals are carried from the
      environment to every cell in your body; far more rapidly than
      scientists once believed based solely on chemical analyses.

      These findings raise important questions concerning theories
      underlying modern medicine, spirituality, and even reincarnation
      according to Dr. Horowitz. The realization that energy messages,
      including ancient ancestral memories, may be relayed electro-
      genetically can help in healing, lending spiritual meaning to life,
      and reconciling "past life" experiences.

      The science reported in DNA: Pirates of the Sacred Spiral, published
      by the not-for-profit Tetrahedron Publishing Group ($29.15; 1-888-508-
      4787), links the genetic revolution to a "spiritual renaissance."
      After polling nearly 10,000 people internationally for background
      research, the Harvard-trained Dr. Horowitz concludes "more and more
      people are experiencing increased synchronicities and even miracles
      in their lives. . . . Working on special projects, they suddenly and
      inexplicably manifest everything they need to facilitate their
      service, purpose, or unique calling. This is a form of genetic
      expression as much as eye color," he says.

      Their soon to be published, meticulously documented, book is written
      for "intelligent lay readers and above." It argues that quantum
      energy, often called spirituality, animates evolution of the species,
      genetic expression, and life. The authors believe such awareness and
      growing social consciousness bodes well for the entire planet.


      Frank Dorrel

      The New 2004 edition is now available!
      Updated with 8 new pages including the War in Iraq

      Why The U.S. Can't Kick Militarism
      An Anti-War Comic Book
      Written & Illustrated by Dr. Joel Andreas

      Over 200,000 in print!

      Number 9 on Los Angeles Times Best Seller list in 2003!

      Read this Book! Buy it for friends. Give a copy to a teacher. It
      makes a great present!

      ADDICTED To WAR takes on the most active, powerful and destructive
      military in the world. Hard-hitting, carefully documented with 161
      reference notes, and heavily illustrated, ADDICTED To WAR reveals why
      the U.S. has been involved in more wars in recent years than any
      other country. Read ADDICTED To WAR to find out who benefits from
      these military adventures, who pays and who dies.

      Endorsed by Teaching For Change, Veterans For Peace, Howard Zinn,
      Martin Sheen, Dr. Helen Caldicott, Susan Sarandon, Ramsey Clark,
      Patch Adams, Ron Kovic, Ed Asner, Medea Benjamin, Woody Harrelson,
      Blase Bonpane, Kris Kristofferson, Michael Parenti, Col. James
      Burkholder, S. Brian Willson, Bill Blum, Kathy Kelly, Rev. James
      Lawson, Fernando Suarez, Michael Franti, Father Roy Bourgeois,
      Kevin Danaher, Mimi Kennedy, Casey Kasem and many others.

      ADDICTED To WAR is being used as a history book in hundreds of high
      schools and colleges.

      The Spanish edition will be available at the end of August or early

      To order ADDICTED To WAR send a check for $10 to:

      Frank Dorrel, P.O. Box 3261
      Culver City, CA 90231-3261
      Phone: 310-838-8131

      Email: fdorrel@...

      For special bulk rates prices go to: www.addictedtowar.com



      The 2-hour Video/DVD -

      What I've Learned About U.S. Foreign Policy:
      The War Against The Third World
      a video compilation by Frank Dorrel

      - has been re-edited as of April of 2004 and now looks better then

      You can see just what it is and read the entire transcript at:

      You can order a DVD or VHS copy by sending $10 to:

      Frank Dorrel, P.O. Box 3261
      Culver City, CA 90231-3261
      Phone: 310-838-8131

      Email: fdorrel@...

      For special bulk rates prices go to: www.addictedtowar.com

      This video has now been seen by over one million people!
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.