Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Army Times: Bush keeps screwing military

Expand Messages
  • Russ Kick
    Army Times, 30 June 2003 http://www.armytimes.com/print.php?f=0-ARMYPAPER-1954515.php Nothing but lip service In recent months, President Bush and the
    Message 1 of 1 , Jun 29, 2003
      Army Times, 30 June 2003

      Nothing but lip service

      In recent months, President Bush and the Republican-controlled
      Congress have missed no opportunity to heap richly deserved praise on
      the military. But talk is cheap -- and getting cheaper by the day,
      judging from the nickel-and-dime treatment the troops are getting

      For example, the White House griped that various pay-and-benefits
      incentives added to the 2004 defense budget by Congress are wasteful
      and unnecessary -- including a modest proposal to double the $6,000
      gratuity paid to families of troops who die on active duty. This
      comes at a time when Americans continue to die in Iraq at a rate of
      about one a day.

      Similarly, the administration announced that on Oct. 1 it wants to
      roll back recent modest increases in monthly imminent-danger pay
      (from $225 to $150) and family-separation allowance (from $250 to
      $100) for troops getting shot at in combat zones.

      Then there�s military tax relief -- or the lack thereof. As Bush and
      Republican leaders in Congress preach the mantra of tax cuts, they
      can�t seem to find time to make progress on minor tax provisions that
      would be a boon to military homeowners, reservists who travel long
      distances for training and parents deployed to combat zones, among

      Incredibly, one of those tax provisions -- easing residency rules for
      service members to qualify for capital-gains exemptions when selling
      a home -- has been a homeless orphan in the corridors of power for
      more than five years now.

      The chintz even extends to basic pay. While Bush�s proposed 2004
      defense budget would continue higher targeted raises for some ranks,
      he also proposed capping raises for E-1s, E-2s and O-1s at 2 percent,
      well below the average raise of 4.1 percent.

      The Senate version of the defense bill rejects that idea, and would
      provide minimum 3.7 percent raises for all and higher targeted hikes
      for some. But the House version of the bill goes along with Bush,
      making this an issue still to be hashed out in upcoming negotiations.

      All of which brings us to the latest indignity -- Bush�s $9.2 billion
      military construction request for 2004, which was set a full $1.5
      billion below this year�s budget on the expectation that Congress, as
      has become tradition in recent years, would add funding as it drafted
      the construction appropriations bill.

      But Bush�s tax cuts have left little elbow room in the 2004 federal
      budget that is taking shape, and the squeeze is on across the board.

      The result: Not only has the House Appropriations military
      construction panel accepted Bush�s proposed $1.5 billion cut, it
      voted to reduce construction spending by an additional $41 million
      next year.

      Rep. David Obey, D-Wis., senior Democrat on the House Appropriations
      Committee, took a stab at restoring $1 billion of the $1.5 billion
      cut in Bush�s construction budget. He proposed to cover that cost by
      trimming recent tax cuts for the roughly 200,000 Americans who earn
      more than $1 million a year. Instead of a tax break of $88,300, they
      would receive $83,500.

      The Republican majority on the construction appropriations panel
      quickly shot Obey down. And so the outlook for making progress next
      year in tackling the huge backlog of work that needs to be done on
      crumbling military housing and other facilities is bleak at best.

      Taken piecemeal, all these corner-cutting moves might be viewed as
      mere flesh wounds. But even flesh wounds are fatal if you suffer
      enough of them. It adds up to a troubling pattern that eventually
      will hurt morale -- especially if the current breakneck operations
      tempo also rolls on unchecked and the tense situations in Iraq and
      Afghanistan do not ease.

      Rep. Chet Edwards, D-Texas, who notes that the House passed a
      resolution in March pledging �unequivocal support� to service members
      and their families, puts it this way: �American military men and
      women don�t deserve to be saluted with our words and insulted by our

      Translation: Money talks -- and we all know what walks.
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.