Sola -- sounds like you asked for an example then provided a pretty good one yourself...
On 6/1/07, † Angel Sola <
This is a very different thing from
> what Kierkegaard is speaking of at that moment in Works of Love.
> he makes reference to the religious in that passage, he's speaking
> who are sensuous-psychic religious, and those who have awakened to
> existence as spirit being religious. Both use the same language,
> means very different things to each of them.
Ok, then would you give me a sentence they would both use, and then
tell me the 'inner' meaning that each one meant. A sample sentence
for us to analyze respectively would
To the sensuous-psychic religious it means.....__________________
To the spirit religious it means.............______________________
So, I have always understood from that passage that they use the same
words, and that the meaning is different. I understood that when one
type uses the word 'spirit' they base it on EXPERIENCE, while the
other bases the word spirit on WHAT???????????......culture-based
memorization of a meme, or some abstract concept? So, one knows what
he's talking about, and the other doesn't........right? To one it is
a concept, to the other an experience.