Re: Reply to Een Enkelte on Understanding and Agreement
- This is Ron, the Moderator. Feel free to address your posts any way
you like. I would like this group to be a place for informal and
enjoyable conversation. Relax and make yourselves at home. I'm happy
to see any conversation here at all!
--- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "Jim Stuart"
> Dear Een,place within a forum such as this, so I shall adopt a case-by-case
> On reflection, I think addressing replies to individuals has a
approach to my method of communication in the future. Diversity of
methods of communication is truer to the spirit of SK than adopting
>communication - I was more defending my own approach against what I
> No, I was not expressing disapproval of your method of
perceived as your disapproval of my original method of communication
in "The Ethical as the Highest Ideal".
>the good - SK himself wrote in several different ways in order to
> As I say above, I think diversity of methods and styles is all to
awaken subjectivity and awareness of the true import of Christianity
in his readers.
>Are you saying that you don't think direct communication is
> Finally, you write "If only direct communication were possible!".
>going further than SK, who, on my understanding, did think direct
> If you do hold that direct communication is impossible, you are
communication was possible, but was not a suitable method for his
own task of awakening subjectivity in his audience.
> Jim Stuart
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]