Re: Hoarse, hourse, horse!
- --- In email@example.com, nnn88388 <no_reply@y...> wrote:
> --- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "Will Brown" <wilbro99@y...>Hey, Ursa Major, my tomatoes are gone with the summer heat and the cat
> > JB, this time, I'll try a point by point response.
> > >No, you're flying again, I'm afraid, way too high for me. I am
> just a
> > rookie here. See I haven't yet finished this Either/Or and you are
> > presenting something that seems to be claiming over the whole
> > of K's production. No, Sir, ain't half fair-play!
> > Yeah, right, a rookie. I sense from your reply to Nick that you
> > well your way around this matter of subjectivity, so gimme a break;
> > you are not turnip truck material. I took you at your word that the
> > difference between the pedestrian use of ethical and the use of the
> > term as apparently used by SK created a dilemma of some sort for
> > My intent was to paint you a picture of that difference by laying
> > what I saw as SK's use of the term.
> > >The only thing the poor me understands in your fly-off is that
> > Either-Or was an early paper, not a late one. So it excludes one of
> > the hypothesis I mentioned in my previous reflection.
> > Did you not understand that when I began with the short paragraph
> > I was saying that there was one idea running through his works that
> > made each part a whole? I was offering the chance to step back from
> > your particular E/O view to get a greater perspective.
> > >Fuck, I am back to ground zero!
> > Shit, man, get you eye off your particular question and look to
> > understand SK's use of the term. When you see that, then make that
> > comparison.
> > >Is the beautiful painting... as a sign... or as a sign...
> > unethical ?
> > Not that I am aware of. What makes you think it is? Why does the
> > question even arise? Before you can answer that question do you not
> > have to determine what the ethical is, or means?
> > >I am being stubborn but I sense the ethical (my conception of the
> > ethical) to be some sort of absolute so I cannot joke about the
> > hypothesis under which something which is mine (the portrait) also
> > unethical.
> > Now, either you are expressing a personal dilemma or you are using
> > that expression, fact or not, as the vehicle to ask another sort of
> > question. That is what my reference to the spider and the fly and
> > parlor that I started my response with; I did not know which level
> > inhabited.
> > >This is very serious business for me! You probably can't
> > You don't have this picture...
> > Yes, I still do not know to whom I am speaking. As a reformed
> > dissembler, I am always suspicious of someone waltzing in as a tyro
> > and asking to be illuminated.
> > >You have spotted my coarse misspelling: horse, of course, not
> > Hoarse! Wonder where I got this woan? Perhaps it is due to my
> > always wondered about this problematic point in the Troyan war: how
> > can Troyans have been so blind in front of such a coarse wooden
> > ? I can't get this point either! See, there is a lot I can't get
> > behind.
> > I can only suggest moving off to the side instead of trying to walk
> > through it. I have heard that the distance necessary to comprehend
> > something is just beyond the pull of identity. I have no idea of
> > all of this horsing around is about.
> > >Well, perhaps I finally don't belong here. I sounds like I won't
> > mates here until I grow more literate. Problem ? While I am growing
> > more literate, you are also, so how can I catch up ? Well, I think
> > is quite as efficient that I give up, no ?
> > Oh, I think that with your obvious sharpness and ability to express
> > yourself that you would be a good addition to this collection of
> > word-smiths. For myself, I would look forward to some delightful
> > dialogues with you. -----willy
> Willy's out! Old Willy just bit the bag and stepped out the door!
> Hey Willy, how do you know a French man has been in your backyard?
> :: Your tomatoes are gone and your dog's pregnant!
is a she that can't be in heat. Otherwise, the fettle is fine. I have
just stumbled across a CUP quote from something that I had archived
some time ago. It was Lowrie so I added the Hong to it and will post
it as a new thread. I think it is another 'ears to hear' quote.