2704Caribbean Project: Review: The Southern Dream of a Caribbean Empire, 1854-1861
- Aug 17, 2012Caribbean Project: Review: The Southern Dream of a Caribbean Empire, 1854-1861
Posted on August 17, 2012 by Hunter Wallace
Robert E. May's The Southern Dream of a Caribbean Empire, 1854-1861 recounts the story of the South's vision of Manifest Destiny in the 1850s.
In the 1840s, the United States under President John Tyler and James K. Polk annexed Texas, went to war with Mexico, acquired California and the American Southwest, and settled the Oregon Question with Great Britain.
From 1848 to 1851, the North and South fought over the spoils of Western expansion in Congress a polarizing contest over the admission of California as a free state ended with the Compromise of 1850 and nearly brought about disunion.
For half a century, the North and South had expanded west across the North American continent as equal partners in the Union. The slave states had expanded along with the free states under the terms of the Missouri Compromise.
The admission of California upset the sectional balance of power by admitting a free state south of the parallel 36°30 north. The polarizing debates over the Wilmot Proviso also put the South on notice that elements in the North sought to reserve all future territory to the free states.
In the 1850s, Robert E. May argues that Manifest Destiny became sectionalized over "the extension of slavery": Northerners attempted to block the addition of new slave states in the West while the South began to nurture its own dream of empire in the Caribbean.
"The Southern Dream of a Caribbean Empire" intensified after the Kansas-Nebraska Act and the rise of the Republican Party in 1854 with its core Wilmot Proviso doctrine of the non-extension of slavery.
Southerners placed great hopes in three unfulfilled Caribbean acquisitions in the 1850s:
No acquisition was more ardently desired in the South or better illustrates the Caribbean Dream than the long sought acquisition of Cuba which had been expected ever since Thomas Jefferson's time:
"Occassionally southerners got so carried away by their own rhetoric about Cuba that their prose became erotic: "[Cuba] admires Uncle Sam, and he loves her. Who shall forbid the bans? Matches are made made in heaven, and why not this? Who can object if he throws his arms around the Queen of the Antilles, as she sits, like Cleopatra's burning throne, upon the silver wares, breathing her spicy, tropics breath, and pouring her rosy, sugared lips? Who can object? She is of age take her, Uncle Sam!"
Three attempts were made by Southern-controlled presidents to purchase Cuba from Spain: James K. Polk in 1848, Franklin Pierce in 1854, and James Buchanan in 1859.
The 1854 attempt produced the Ostend Manifesto which strongly implied the Pierce administration was willing to go to war with Spain to prevent British-inspired abolition and the Africanization of Cuba.
In 1848 and 1854, the Spanish government refused to sell Cuba. By 1859, Republicans in Congress were strong enough to block the acquisition of Cuba through purchase or war, and Spain was still unwilling to sell anyway.
The Venezuelan filibuster Narciso López cooperated with Southern expansionists in a failed attempt to conquer Cuba for Dixie in 1851. John Quitman, "father of secession," close ally of Robert Barnwell Rhett, and governor of Mississippi, was even prosecuted in federal court for his involvement in an armed conspiracy to invade Cuba.
Virtually every major political figure in the Lower South in the 1850s Rhett, Yancey, Davis, Toombs, Stephens, Benjamin and others supported Cuban annexation which was something of a litmus test issue at the time.
Even Northerners like Stephen Douglas loudly championed Cuban annexation. The 1856 Democratic platform called for American ascendancy in the Gulf of Mexico.
Within Cuba, some planters correctly feared that British pressure upon the Spanish government would bring about the abolition of slavery and the demise of white supremacy, and some of them supported annexation for that reason.
If the sectional controversy over slavery had not put the brakes on American expansion in the 1850s, Cuba would have likely shared the fate of Texas and Florida.
Mexico continued to be a fertile target for Southern expansion well after the Mexican War.
In 1848, President James K. Polk attempted to annex the Republic of Yucatán. The bill passed the House of Representatives only to be defeated in the Senate.
The Gadsden Purchase of 1853 resulted in the acquisition of southern Arizona and southern New Mexico. The original plan would have acquired a huge section of Northern Mexico including Baja California, Baja California Sur, Coahuila, Chihuahua, Sonora, Nuevo León, and Tamaulipas.
In 1858, President James Buchanan attempted to purchase Lower California, Sonora, and Chihuahua and establish a protectorate over Northern Mexico his plan was blocked by Republicans in Congress.
During the War Between the States, Santiago Vidaurri, the governor of Nuevo León and Coahuila petitioned Jefferson Davis for annexation to the Confederacy. This was highly impractical though due to wartime considerations.
In the 1850s, countless private filibusters attempted to conquer parts of Northern Mexico. One such expedition was led by William Walker who invaded Baja California and attempted to annex Sonora before he was repulsed.
The Knights of the Golden Circle, the most colorful of all the antebellum Southern Rights organizations, was a predominantly Texas-based organization that regarded the conquest of Mexico as its primary field of operations.
When Louisiana seceded from the Union in 1861, its commissioners argued that Texas should secede for both states could cooperate in the Southern Confederacy to complete the conquest of the Gulf of Mexico.
The Confederate secret service would attempt to engineer the secession of Veracruz from Mexico a few months later.
Aside from Cuba and Mexico, Nicaragua proved to be the last major target for Southern expansion in the Caribbean in the 1850s.
In this case, Southerners pinned their hopes on William Walker the "grey eyed man of destiny," and the most successful filibuster in American history who conquered Nicaragua in 1855 and restored slavery there in a bid for Southern support for his legitimacy in 1856
Although the U.S. opposed filibustering, arrested Walker, and never seriously considered annexing his shortlived regime, William Walker became a hero in the Lower South and was one of the most well known men of his times.
Walker was a romantic figure who attracted support from Northerners and Southerners alike before he played the slavery card in an attempt to save his regime.
"Thus even his individualism is a mere denial of anything higher, and not an affirming of his own soul. The extraordinary man is the one who puts something else before his own life and security. Even as he faced the firing squad, William Walker could have saved his life by merely renouncing his claim to President of Nicaragua. To the common man, this is insane."
In 1860, William Walker was executed by a firing squad in Honduras at the age of 36 during his final bid to reconquer Nicaragua. Francis Parker Yockey exalts him above as the embodiment of Faustian man in Imperium although the circumstances of his death were due to more to British resentment of his actions on Ruatan and the Mosquito Coast.
A Dream Deferred
The Southern Dream of a Caribbean Empire was blocked by Northern Republicans, internal division within the South, resistance from Spain and Mexico, and the outbreak of the War Between the States.
After leaving the Union, Southerners temporarily disavowed their imperial ambitions in a bid for European recognition and support, and to keep Mexico neutral and a useful partner in circumventing the Yankee blockade of the Southern coast.
The destruction of the Union also eliminated a major rationale for Caribbean expansion because there was no longer any need to retain parity with the free states in the Senate.
In the final two chapters, Robert E. May makes an interesting argument that Caribbean expansion was the poison pill that killed the Crittenden Compromise and destroyed the only chance to save the Union in 1861.
Why the Hispanic Caribbean? Why not the British Caribbean or French Caribbean? I could quibble with this book over any number of points, but it is fairly obvious that Cuba and Mexico were targeted for their relative weakness, whereas major acquisitions from Britain and France were outside the realm of possibility.
May shows his bias when he fails to blame Yankee extremism for causing of the War Between the States. Cuba or Lower California could have been added as slave states as easily as Missouri or Texas without recourse to secession and armed conflict.
He could have also spent some time analyzing postbellum American expansion in the Caribbean: Grant's attempt to annex the Dominican Republic, the Spanish-American War, the creation of the Panama Canal, etc.
This book is still a good read. It is a launching pad for a broader inquiry into U.S. foreign policy in the Caribbean and Latin America. Slaveowners may have dreamed of a Caribbean Empire, but the Yankee created real Banana Republics.
That's something we will turn to later.
6 Responses to Caribbean Project: Review: The Southern Dream of a Caribbean Empire, 1854-1861
August 17, 2012 at 11:43 am
Excellent and detailed review, HW.
Hunter Wallace says:
August 17, 2012 at 12:16 pm
Post this to the LoS group. Everytime I poet links my mobile screws them up.
Hunter Wallace says:
August 17, 2012 at 12:24 pm
The Caribbean: A History of the Region and Its Peoples
Avengers of the New World: The Story of the Haitian Revolution
American Mediterranean: Southern Slaveholders In the Age of Emancipation
Fr. John+ says:
August 17, 2012 at 2:18 pm
It's fascinating to realize that our ancestors in the South, saw the conquest, control, and eventual annexation of the lands as necessary for growth and stability. Even more to the point, your review points out that Yankee bigotry and intransigence, coupled with their heretical abolitionist sentiment, are fully to blame for later problems in these very areas, that have made the latter half of the 20th and early 21st Century so disastrous for the USA.
Cuba would never have fallen to Castro, the Bay of Pigs might never have happened, Kennedy might still have lived, and meximidgets, Arizona's immigration bills, a mulatto president blocking the will of a sovereign state, and drug trafficking, as well as hordes of `illegals' all of it would NOT have happened, had we merely done what a Christian nation knew to do- Manifest Destiny- Whites to rule all nations, benevolently, as Whites.
Thanks, Hunter. Your columns continue to inform.
August 17, 2012 at 3:37 pm
HW asks, "Why the Hispanic Caribbean? Why not the British Caribbean or French Caribbean? I could quibble with this book over any number of points, but it is fairly obvious that Cuba and Mexico were targeted for their relative weakness, whereas major acquisitions from Britain and France were outside the realm of possibility ."
Always wondered about this whole history.
Cuba seemed like for sheer proximity. They're borders and so important. Somebody who went to HS in FL told me (would have been the 70s I think) he had to take "communism versus capitalism" classes classes which were instituted in their school system after the Bay of Pigs. He also had all hardcore communist teachers who were the only ones who signed up to teach it.
But the Spanish and English, while both main groups in the americas, are very different cultures. I'm versed in the Jword-youknowwhos but the fifth column in u.s. government did not decide to print everything in hebrew without asking. It printed everything in spanish, which is an astonishing act on many levels, particularly in its jaw-dropping aggression. Also, it clarifies the enmeshment of government and all businesses (fascism), because of the sheer coordination involved to accomplish this "cultural revolution" in the anglo world, (which the u.s. inarguably was just 30 years ago).
The real issue, then and now, seems how anglos and spanish deal with each other.
What would they have done had they won? Were they going to take over Spanish planter areas, then use native populations already involved in the planter economy, like sugar or whatever?
Hunter Wallace says:
August 17, 2012 at 3:59 pm
I would imagine that Cuba would have become another Florida, Louisiana, or Texas. The existence of slavery and the need to preserve white supremacy would have blunted Anglo-Spanish ethnic and religious tensions.