Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Draft Tax Code: hardly charitable to charities

Expand Messages
  • karmayog - tanya
    DTC: Hardly charitable to charities 31 Oct 2009, 0342 hrs IST, V RAGHUNATHAN, The draft Direct Tax Code (DTC) Bill, 2009 - now open to public for reactions if
    Message 1 of 1 , Nov 1, 2009
      DTC: Hardly charitable to charities

      31 Oct 2009, 0342 hrs IST, V RAGHUNATHAN,

      The draft Direct Tax Code (DTC) Bill, 2009 - now open to public for
      reactions if enacted, will be law, effective April 1, 2011. The key
      of the Bill is ostensibly to simplify direct taxation. But for the social
      sector, far from effecting such simplification, the draft is bound to impact
      the social sector most adversely.

      For example, change in the term 'charitable purpose' to 'permitted welfare
      activities' in section 88 (1) of chapter IV is pregnant with serious
      consequences. The new term is unduly restrictive and will give rise to
      needless nitpicking and another avenue for corrupt babus to harass honest

      Suppose a charitable trust, society or a section 25 company normally works
      in the field of poverty alleviation, which is the 'permitted charitable
      activity'. Moved by unprecedented floods in a state, it decides to undertake
      some flood relief measures - not a 'permitted welfare activity', but a
      charitable activity surely. Why should the government deny tax exemption to
      such an organization?

      Another issue of major concern is the proposed introduction of tax on
      not-for-profit organizations (NPOs). The leakages in the government's
      welfare departments are such that what finally reaches the intended
      beneficiaries in any welfare scheme is rather small, as is widely known and

      The changes suggested in the draft code pertaining to charitable trusts are
      such that at a time when a large number of corporate CSR bodies or NPOs are
      engaged in exemplary social work and adding significant value to the overall
      social objective of the nation, they are bound to shrink the funds available
      to the social sector.

      There may be some who misuse the not-for-profit status but that can hardly
      be the reason to throw the baby with the bath water. There is no reason why
      such organizations cannot be held accountable for their actions on a
      case-to-case basis.

      Another issue concerns the tax computation based on cash system of
      accounting in the proposed code. Many countries in the world including
      India, are on the way to adopting International Financial Reporting
      Standards so that accounts are understood uniformly across the globe.

      There is no reason why an NPO, like any other organization, will not have
      receivables and payables at the end of the financial period. In such a
      scenario, the proposed system appears to be retrograde.

      The draft code calls for spending 100% of donation receipts in the same
      year. This appears to be completely unreasonable. Current regulation
      (section 11 of the Income Tax Act, 1961) permits the charitable
      organizations to accumulate 15% of current year's donations for spending in
      the following year and any excessive amount can be accumulated with the
      consent of assessing officer.

      This facility is very logical and reasonable considering that a lot of
      donations are typically received at the fag end of the financial year. In
      fact, even the government of India's funding itself often comes at the end
      of a financial year. What is more, the funding could well be for

      Under the circumstances, the clause for 100% spending in the same year in
      which the funds are obtained is not only infeasible, but ignores the reality
      of donors and the spenders in equal measure. Further, in the draft code,
      advance payment is not treated as current expenditure, while advance receipt
      is treated as current income! Consider this. 'Outgoings' u/s 90(f) includes
      "any amount, other than any loan or advance, actually paid during the year
      to any other non-profit-organization engaged in similar permitted activity".
      Clearly, advances paid to other NPOs are not to be treated as 'outgoings'.
      This is logical.

      If 'outgoings' do not include advances paid, should 'gross receipts' include
      advances received? Clearly not! But not according to the draft code! As per
      section 89(2)(a) of the DTC, 'gross receipts' include 'the amount of
      voluntary contributions received'. Since the 'contributions received' could
      well be in advance or for multi-year-expenditure, which accounting principle
      could justify this absurd provision?

      And finally, another severe blow to the sector in the draft code pertains to
      the computation of exempted income for taxation. According to the existing
      section 11(1), "...the following income shall not be included in the total
      income..." On the other hand, according to the proposed section 87 in the
      draft code, "...the total income shall be computed..." There is a clear
      disadvantage implicit in the draft code.

      To explain it further, the current norms permit accumulation of income by
      NPOs. For instance, income from property held under a trust for charitable
      purposes is exempt to the extent it is utilized for such purposes. In
      addition to the income spent on such purposes during the relevant accounting
      period, income accumulated or set apart for application to such purposes up
      to 15% of the income is also exempt.

      This privilege will no longer be available to such charities. One hopes the
      finance minister will be more charitable to the charities.

      (The author is CEO, GMR Varalakshmi Foundation, Views are personal.)

    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.