Re: Your budget analysis of social sector proposals?
- I noticed that many Central Govt. employees are responding with their
inquiries and comments to the Economic Times (29th Feb) news item on
the probable hike in salaries due to the Sixth Pay Commissiion Report.
I feel disgusted at the quality of the comments. All who are
reasonably well read should be aware that the Sixth Pay Commission
Report will be presented only on the 31st March 2008. The fact that so
many of the responses to the news are still asking for details shows
their poor knowledge and therefore their inferior skills. Yet they are
among the first to ask for more! The 28th Feb. issue of The Eco Times
shows that the probable 25% hike in salary for the FOUR million
central employees will need an additional rupees 48,500 crore. This
sum is more than the 'proposed allocation' for 'health, schools and
agriculture' taken together. Something to think about.
While these FOUR million want a life free from deficiency, will they
daily think about the deficiency syndrome of the 300 million citizens
In another Economic Times item (29th Feb), the DOUBLING of the spend
on 'administration of justice' from rupees 108 to 253 Crores in the
last budget is discussed. It seems rupees 115 Crores was set aside for
I wish to point out: Prompt delivery of justice must go hand in hand
with in better education. While the latter has received a big boost
under various schemes, just doubling justice spending is not enough
since we are already woefully short of courts and their infrastucture.
I wish in this FY09 bill, it has been tripled with specific monitoring
for more courts, more judges at all levels and more mobile courts, of
the justice system. Better computerization will only beget better
statistics, not better justice, this funding should be outside the
spend for actual justice implementation.
This new Finance Bill FY09 has done the unthinkable in populist
policy. Writing off farmer loans, reminds me of an earlier era.
During PM Indira Gandhi's time, one of her Ministers: Janardhan
Poojari, would go about arranging 'loan melaas' and distribute money
and garner votes. This was considered a great socialistic move and
praised such that 'Indira became synonymous with India'. She outdid
her father the great Jawaharlal who abdigated on 'compensation' for
'land nationalizaion'. She is remembered for 'prince purses', bank
nationalization' and 'collieries nationalization'. We citizens are
still enjoying the fruits of these great deeds. There is no shortage
of fools, right from Md Bin Tuglak's time, who gave away gold coins
for copper. These 'gigantic personalities' are revered-revilled, even
This single deed has dealt a body blow to financial prudance. Now the
farmer will always think that a 'loan' after delinquancy becomes a
'grant'. In some way, this has been going on every few years in some
measure. A simpler policy would have been to reduce interest rates to
2% retroactively, grant a five year period to pay off amount thru
EMIs, allow fresh loans to be permitted, again at lower rates. Why
should farmers pay higher rates than what the RBI gets for its dollar
securities? Allow 'market' driven economy for farm products, provide
supply chains free of state borders, better seeds and technology free
to the marginal farmers, tax the rich farmers who earn more than Rs. 3
lakhs per year. Force the 28 states to fall in line, by denying their
farmers the above benifits, for not cooperating. Most important is to
encourage thru fiscal measures, marginal farmers to combine with
others so that their joint holdings reach 100 hectares, which will
allow economies of scale. Such cooperatives to be like village
panchayats, keep all politicians out of it. Dissolve all politicial
driven farm cooperatives by denying them tax deductions and subsidies
of any kind.
Such simple reforms have been known to work since the last plan
period, yet our FM Chidu has no heart for it. Giving a fish instead
of teaching how to fish, ensures that the particular group remains
enmeshed in poverty to be then browbeaten evey election time. I am
certain this FM will join the other 'gigantic personalities' mentioned
before and be revered-revilled for ages to come.
--- In email@example.com, "karmayog.org" <info@...> wrote:
> Please email us your comments on the proposals made in the Union
Budget on 29th Feb pertaining to the Social Sector.
> All responses will be displayed in the "Join Today's Discussion"
link in www.karmayog.org .
> Individual perspectives highlight different pros and cons.
> This enables a broader and deeper understanding than commonly
> www.karmayog.org -- understanding the future
- I can understand the optimism and hope that Mathur has in the current
government in setting 'things right'. However, his approach to the
criticism that citizens have expressed to the Finance Bill shows a
1. It is the vociferous criticism in and out of Parliament that has
caused the FM to think things thru and daily come up with statement to
fine tune his largess. These obvious things should have been part of
the Finance Bill and not post facto explanations. The print media has
shown how inadequate has been the transparency of the FM in giving
away taxpayers monies.
2. Claims that "... whatever development is there in the country
today is all because of the foundations laid by the thoughts of the
people like Chidambram and Manmohan Singh over the decades ..." is
too ridiculous to counter. I suppose this great country lacks any
thinkers and doers other than these two. Let's not forget the
officers in the finance ministry and the planning commission and the
various dept. who have been trying to get things to move ahead, but
are failing due to the politicisation of each and every proposal. Let
us not forget the leaders of industry and the services sector who have
been shouting hoarse about the various lacunae in the laws which are
yet to be set right. Let us not forget the agri-business and
cultivators who have had to sacrifice their lives before being heard
by a government after FOUR long years ... at the fag end of their term.
3. Suggestions and criticism do NOT stop the FM from doing his duty.
It is supposed to aid them and point them in the right direction
which job the politicians have seriously failed to do.
4. Cultivators go to the money lenders not out of abundant choice
but due the ineptitude of the various governments in providing banking
and finance close to the farmer. Let's not forget that only about 20%
households in the rural areas have access to banking ... sixty years
after political freedom. If this is not criticised, I am sure another
one hundred years will pass while we allow the 'great personalities'
carry on as before.
5. This is the first finance bill, that education in its various
forms has found a substantial place. But again, with inadequate
nourishment, don't expect rural citizens to push their children to
schools. Adequate nourishment to pregnant mothers and the first two
years of the child's growth will determine how many go to school and
become 'employable'. This issue is still to be addressed. More
schools will not help as we find we have so many 'educated
6. The citizens of India have woken up; they are not prepared to
wait another sixty years for basic facilities and infrastructure. If
the politicos do not take heed and get to work, there will be a
revolution, which we need to avoid at all costs. Naxalites and
Maoists are the tip of the iceberg.
7. If one watches the Lok Sabha TV channel, one can see how many of
our expensive MPs are attending and participating. These are the
'kaam chor' folks who need to wake up soon. Many reports have been
written about them and their activities, creating a ruckus being the
least of them. The Rajya Sabha TV channel shows even fewer who care
to attend the various discussions. Its time to focus on 'citizens
candidates' .... Politics and government are too important to be left
to the bureaucracy and the politicos.
--- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "G.C. Mathur" <gcmbinty@...> wrote:
> Dear friends in Karmayog,
> Ref to the following in KD 3443 dated 14.03.2008 and other mails in
different KDs on the subject of the sum of Rs.60,000 crores laid off
by the FM in this budget for the farmers to pay off the debt, my
suggest to all those who feel concerned is to keep patience till the
Budget is finally discussed and adopted in the Parliament. My appeal
to the MPs in the Parliament is to spare time for discussion rather
than creating ruckus and wasting public time and money just to oppose
for the sake of opposing.
> After all, do not forget that whatever development is there in the
country today is all because of the foundations laid by the thoughts
of the people like Chidambram and Manmohan Singh over the decades. It
was Manmohan Singh who got the gold mortgaged by the past P.M.
released and brought back the sick to the hail and hearty economy.
> I am very confident of this group of dedicated people with
constructive minds to carry the country forward. Let us give them a
continued opportunity to work on with concentration rather than create
hurdles with them by making suggestions which are not applicable in
the larger interest.
> If farmers go to money lenders outside the official banking system
it is because of the aggressive marketing of the private sector. How
many times you have heard that farmers run away with the loans.
Farmers need education on managing finances, particularly micro
finance in order to get out of the clutches of the money lenders. In
microfinance, they need the help of the banking sector and the public
> Let us educate farmers to be good buyers of seeds, fertilisers, and
animals from the market by educating them about their rights as
consumers. Let us educate them about how to tackle MNCs who supply
them seeds that are genetically modified by entering into sales
agreements with safeguards against degenerating of their soil,
productivity, unhealthy produce, environmental hazards, etc.
> I would have appreciated if you and me had raised loud voice against
Members of Parlilament in the opposition at any given time making a
discussion or debate difficult and making a mockery of the presiding
> G. C. Mathur
> G. C. Mathur
> 2.1. Re: Your budget analysis of social sector proposals?
> Posted by: "Praful Vora"
praful.vora@... Thu Mar 13, 2008 10:28 pm
(PDT) The last few days, a lot of
attention has been focused by the Lok Sabha,
> Rajya Sabha, print media and the TV talk shows on the farmer debt
> proposed by the Finance Bill for FY09. A consensus seems to be being
> arrived at that, the off-budget sum of Rupees Sixty Thousand
Crores, if and when used to to provide relief to some cultivators, is
at best a palliativebut not a cure for the persistent agri-crisis
facing India for many years now. The basis issues causing the crisis
have not been addressed in the last four years of this current
government, and at the last moment (last year before national
elections), it seems a 'cash for forgiveness' is being offered.
> A lot of heart burn has been caused to many cultivators who feel
left out of
> this governmental largess. All those who were regular in
> debts, those who had to manage loans from the money lenders and
those who suffered due to volatility in cash crop prices are out in the
> cold. Basically, it is not easy for the FM to accurately determine
> a unique measure to target the indebted cultivator who is really in a
> desperate condition. It is clear now that the ceiling of 2 hectare
> best a rather poor measure, especially if farmers of Punjab and
Maharashtra are analysed. Dry farming seems to have escaped the relief
> In this regard, I feel, all cultivators who have a total income
> 100,000 per year could be classed as poor and so entitled to relief,
> irrespective of their land holding, quality of land, farming methods or
> crop. The easy method to determine the annual income would be to
encourage them to file their annual income-tax returns and provide
them with PAN cards. As of now, so many citizens are required to
obtain their PAN cards and file 'returns' even if they do not have to
pay any tax. So why not our about 12.4 million cultivators?
Eventually, the rich farmers will be separated from the needy one's so
that targeting of all kinds of relief is
> better managed. I wonder if any Constitutional amendments are
> data gathering through existing systems. The Kisan Credit Card
> serve the purpose since it did not assess the income.
> In the current situation, the existing information with the Dist.
> and Gram Panchayat could be used for better targeting of the needy
> cultivators. Over a period of five years, the IT data will be very
> for all kinds of social allocations too. Do our elected
> the gumption to change the rules without getting emotional as always?
> Jai Kisan.
> Please visit my blog: http://ThinkUnderst andAcceptAdapt. blogspot. com
> Message and Attachments checked free of virus and worms with
> McAfeeVirusScanEnte rprise v8.0.0 Auto Update.
> Please use this email id for pictures and large files.
> Back to top
> Reply to sender |
Reply to group |
Reply via web post
> Messages in this topic (56)
> 2.2. Re: Your budget analysis of social sector proposals?
> Posted by: "Priya Ranjan" priya@...
Thu Mar 13, 2008 10:28 pm (PDT)
____________ _________ _________ _________ ________
> AID-awareness is grateful to Shreyas, Ved, Anish, Devi and whole
Free/Open source coummunity (Yo GNU/LINUX!!) for their tremendous
technical support. AID awareness thanks Harsha Belludi and Abhisek for
providing real time petition support and related follow up services.
We are also grateful to numerous contributors who make us more aware
about the Indian world around us. AID-awareness provides only content
delivery services and messages forwarded on this list are NOT written
by Priya Ranjan.
> Aid-awareness mailing list
> Aid-awareness@ aidindia. org
> To unsubscribe please login at
> http://lists. aidindia. org/mailman/ listinfo/ aid-awareness
> Back to top
> Reply to sender |
Reply to group |
Reply via web post
> Messages in this topic (56)
> 2.3. Re: Your budget analysis of social sector proposals?
> Posted by: "jitu11in@..." jitu11in@...
Thu Mar 13, 2008 10:32 pm (PDT)
> Juts yesterday DNA had published that some survey that
> was conducted by some organization which say that only
> 23% farmers go to regular commercial banks for loans
> and it is also to be noted that banks don't give loan
> to past defaulters. So this proved that more than 75%
> farmers have to seek loan either from moneylenders or
> from friends and relatives. So PM's move will help
> only ¼ of farmer population. Our CM Vilas rao Deshmukh
> also commented that farmer loan wavier should have
> made differentiation between farmers that work on
> fertile land like those with irrigation facility and
> those that work on land that r not fertile and have no
> irrigation facilities and waving of loans should have
> been restricted to poor farmers working on hard land.
> Jitendra gupta
> Please go through further comments made by "vinobansal"
of[awakening_india] who wrote as follows 50% people in USA were
dependent on agriculture in 1900 AD. Today less than 2% people are
engaged in agricultural activities. Even then, Government of USA keep
providing many of the farmers generous farm subsidies!.
> 98% people can support 2% people. That's hardly a problem. But how
> can 50% people be given enough fund to raise their living standard?
> It is impossible. No Government in any country can mobilize that kind
> of revenue. So conmen known as congress party in India will keep
> playing the con game of false promises and keep on doling out alms
> every now and then. With the help from supporting Media and free
> support from left ( In the name of "BJP roko" ) they can possibly win
> the next election and the farmers will remain whatthey are ,until
> they commit suicide en mass!
> Agriculture is like any other business activity. Sales realization
minus input cost +labour cost is profit for the farmer. Banks are
commercial entities ( Not charitable As some people tend to believe !
) and they give loan at prevailing interest rate after taking into
consideration the security of the principle amount.Majority of farmers
in India find today that agriculture is no more a profitable activity.
Yet their being no alternative available to
> them, they keep tilling the land with other's money (Barrowed ).
The only way to improve the lot of Rural India is a) Effective check
on population growth b) Gradual reduction of manpower in agriculture
by effective re training & generation of employment opportunities else
where. USA did that. Europe did that and now China is doing the same
thing. But it requires dedication and honesty , in planning and
execution, seemingly impossible in India, because it does not get you
votes in short run 1
> Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo!