Re: Pl suggest systemic changes in Govt. procedures to reduce Corruption
- From: ~rAjOo~To: Karmayog.orgSent: Friday, March 02, 2007 2:04 PMSubject: Re: Pl suggest systemic changes in Govt. procedures to reduce CorruptionHi Vinay:My input is that ACB also cover semi-central government organizations, especially in Bombay, prime examples of which are Export Promotion Council, most of these are very badly managed, bogged down by corruption, favoritism and nepotism.The other area are the city colleges, eg. Jai Hind College, Hinduja College, etc. where Principals themselves are directly involved in taking bribes, even from needy students.[ Thanks.1. Semi-central govt orgs must be coming under some anti-corruption body e.g. CBI. I can find out if useful for you.2. Pl advise some specific (but generic) instances where all EPC extracts money from exporters.3. The accusation against principals of city colleges is severe. Do you know any students or ex-students who will come forward to vouch for this via their own experiences?Vinay]
- 1. Are you in contact with anyone in Transparency Int'l in Delhi?2. There is a seminar pertaining to corruption in Ahmedabad on April 11 - 12. Are you attending that?3. Before planning any Workshop, I think you should meet with ACB, 2-3 RTI activists in Mumbai, 1-2 anti-corruption NGOs in Mumbai, etc. I would be happy to organise those.Pl revert.VinayPS: Pl don't refer to me as Chairman. I am happy to facilitate.----- Original Message -----From: G.C. MathurTo: info@...Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 7:24 PMSubject: Re: Pl suggest systemic changes in Govt. procedures to reduce Corruption28.03.2007I am very sorry for this delay in my response which is because of occupation in other commitments equally imporatant as a Convenor-Trustee of Binty.I have studied every mail to Karmayog on the subject. All the complaints are the same: the entire system is 'corrupt' including the higher judiciary. This is accepted by one and all, me too. It is in the interest of all of us that we start not talking about corruption only, but start finding solutions.The example of the likes of Manmohan Singh and President Kalam are not appropriate to the subject. The examples are of the likes of Mulayam Singh, Laloo Prasad and Justice Mukherjee of Delhi High Court presently under suspension, and these abound. The top bosses mean the Heads of the Departments/Institutions.I am going straight to deal with the subject of 'systemic change' as an agenda for the suggested Workshop, and I invite reviews, responses, and critiques for fine tuning the same.My objective is not to eliminate corruption, but to reduce it to the minimum acceptable because corruption has another socio-economic angle to the benefit of certain. Mind it, corruption is not limited to bribing only. Corrupt practices involve a lot more than bribing.The question before us is: Is it the system that is defective or the operators of system are defective, not suitable for the positions held by them?Another question before us is: How to make the system work?Then identify the players in the system - bureaucracy, corporate houses, political leadership, voters, business management education, unfair business practices, and the 'self' who helps creating the demand for corrupt practices. This is my understanding of the players in the corrupt system.Then, as I said earler, I identify the tools available in the hands of the individual 'citizens', citizens as consumers of goods and services, civil societies - in the one part.The other part lies in the institutions already identified by me.The tools have already been identified by me. However, I am looking forward to additions and deletions to these tools from the participating Karmayogis.Individual in the system is the largest contributor to the failing system. The individual can be the single largest common factor in improving the system. If the individual decides not to bribe come what may, resists temptations, demands loudly the fair dealing, besides applying the legal means like RTI and CPA, I am confident of winning half the battle.At this stage I would once again like Vinay to work on the holding of the Workshop.G. C. Mathur
karmayog.org wrote:1. the email below was circulated.2. awaiting from you -- While I am working to give an appropriate reply to all the mails received since Digest No.1300 of 2.3.07,3. These have been uploaded at http://www.karmayog.org/yahoogroupmessages/4. we have a meeting with ACB on 28th March to think through next steps.Vinay----- Original Message -----From: G.C. MathurSent: Monday, March 19, 2007 6:19 PMSubject: Re: Pl suggest systemic changes in Govt. procedures to reduce19.03.2007Referring to items No.20(a) & (b) of Karmayog Digest No.1329 of 19.03.2007,on the cited subject, I had on 14.03.07 sent the following mail on the subject, which, I believe, has escaped Mr. Vinays considerations for inviting views of Karmayogies:"I think the time has come when we should proceed further from this stage, and let the mails from Sarvshri Srinivas and Samuhanandin the Karmayog Digest No.1320 dt.14.03.07 reproduced below, be the last of this 'Inaugural Session'.While I am working to give an appropriate reply to all the mails received since Digest No.1300 of 2.3.07, in the meantime, may I call the next phase of this PROJECT of "Systemic Changes in Government Procedures to Reduce Corruption" a 'Workshop for Members of Karmayog' who have proved beyond doubt that they (rather, we) are all concerned with the impact of corruption on the Indian psyche?If agreed, then, with the permission of the Chairman Mr. Vinay, I invite the thousands of Karmayogis to help us identify the tools available with we the citizens of 'secular democracy' to bring the systtemic chang in the governance of Democracy. Because I feel that once the tools are known to the citizens, their sharpening to cut through the cancer of corruption will be easy - it is my belief.The tools I have in mind are:a) Comptroller and Auditor General of India.b) Union and State Public Service Commissions - for terms of employment.c) Regulatory Mechanism - Machinery - for different industries.d) Disputes Settlement Authorities in different segments of trade, industry, and services.e) Right to Information Act, 2005.f) Consumer Protection Act, 1986.g) Institute of Chartered Accountants of India - the biggest source of muffling corruption.h) Competition Commission of India - for fostering and regulating competition.i) Transparency in contract agreements of the Government.Karmayogis are free to tick, cut, add, and/or substitute any of the above.We all know the depth of the roots of corruption, its impact on society, and environment. What is desired is the action to be taken to improve the situation to a tolerance limit, for which identification of the tools available with us is necessary. Once the tools are identified, the we all will be working on each of the tools for application.Having said all that I wanted to at this stage, I invite the Chairman to throw up the subject to the open house."