why are we seen as a Soft Sector?
- Very pertinent questions.
Let's hear what people have to say.
----- Original Message -----
I was just going back through some of the Karmayog digests and noticed your
posting of 21Nov and your request for better organization / follow up of
meetings with you. The Development sector is indeed notorious for the very
things you've pointed out. Kudos on your patience.
Does the Dev sector really, truly recognize the value of the funds we get?
As you mentioned in your 21 Nov posting, there is often a stark difference
between the focus seen in the for-profit vs. non-profit sector. We
recognize that a 3 lakh grant helps us continue our work (and sometimes
makes the difference between surviving and shutting up shop). But if we
were to look at ourselves through the lens of output and impact per Rupee,
would we qualify as effective? There's a reason we're seen as such a soft
sector - how are we contributing to that? What kind of follow-up do we do?
What kind of larger picture are we
addressing? Can we get away with saying a non-performer has a good heart
and so warrants a salary or do we set more aggressive skills development