Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Justice Verma Com. Report Revolutionary Roadmap to Gender Justice

Expand Messages
  • Thiagarajan Arunachalam
    From: *karmayog - tanya* http://tehelka.com/revolutionary-roadmap-to-gender-justice/ Revolutionary Roadmap to Gender Justice Revati Laul on why the Justice
    Message 1 of 1 , Feb 1, 2013
      From: karmayog - tanya


      Revolutionary Roadmap to Gender Justice

      Revati Laul on why the Justice Verma Committee Report is a paradigm shift

      January 24, 2013, Issue 5 Volume 10

      IF THE people of India needed tactile evidence that the ground beneath their
      feet has shifted on gender issues, then on 23 January, it arrived. Exactly
      one month after Justice JS Verma was asked by the government to look at the
      gaping holes in our criminal justice system to deal with rape, he delivered
      a 657-page report that is really a roadmap to dismantling patriarchy across
      all our institutions.

      The report begins by signposting the misogyny in our law - in "outraging of
      modesty" and "honour" of a rape victim - and recommending that these be
      scrapped. It goes on to ask the framers of our law in Parliament to consider
      a contemporary definition of sexuality as their starting point. "A sexual
      field of multiple and fluid identities." Crimes of sex must include those
      against the transgenders, homosexuals and lesbians.

      Rape is re-defined as any form of non-consensual penetration. And possibly
      for the first time, marital rape is discussed at length as an essential part
      of the crime. The relationship of the victim with the perpetrator should be
      of no consequence, says the report. It also takes on board the views of
      activists like Irom Sharmila of Manipur, in recommending that people in the
      armed forces are not doing their duty when they rape women and should
      therefore not be immune from trial under the common law. Apart from rape,
      various forms of sexual assault - from sexual harassment at the workplace to
      groping, teasing and touching a woman or a child in ways they find
      inappropriate - need to be punished as serious offences.

      There are entire chapters explaining how the police must conduct itself. The
      report suggests police officers should be put in jail for a year if they don't
      register a rape case. Each layer of the horrors a victim currently faces is
      addressed squarely - the "two-finger test" being one. In fact, the report
      says what lawyers like Vrinda Grover have been asking for: that doctors
      cannot decide whether a victim has been raped or not. They can only examine
      her for bruises and treat those accordingly. The emphasis on the medical
      certificate as the "evidence" on which a case rests has got to go, the
      report firmly asserts.

      Punishments should start with 10 years as the minimum, going up to the
      imposition of a life sentence. The consistently liberal view on gender
      rights goes across the report, which states clearly they are on the side of
      women's groups in thinking of the death penalty and chemical castration as
      regressive and unnecessary. The question of lowering the age of juveniles
      from 18 to 16 would also be to absolve the State of its essential duty to
      turn homes for juveniles into the space they're meant to be - correctional
      facilities where the mind of the juvenile is intensively worked on.

      The report also asks for the missing pieces in our institutional framework
      to be put in place if any of the suggestions are to have meaning. Women's
      cells need to be set up, police reforms are urgently needed and the
      government needs to open its eyes to all the provisions already sitting in
      various ministries from as far back as 1939. Since none of these are in
      place and women are victims of this abject apathy, the commission puts out a
      Bill of Rights for women.

      Women's rights activists like Suneeta Dhar of Jagori says this is definitely
      a paradigm shift. "It's brilliant to have gone in there and to have finally
      been heard."

      For Mihira Sood, a lawyer who worked with the Justice Verma Committee, this
      shouldn't even have had to be the outcome of the recent outrage. "All these
      issues are no longer radical. This, for us, is now common sense and its
      counter intuitive that this is not provided for."

      What is basic and essential to half of India is now finally on paper. But if
      the government's reaction time is anything to go by, going forward from here
      won't be easy. Justice Verma began his address to the press by saying that
      the government only sent in their suggestions on the last day. And the
      police commissioners didn't send in any. The committee worked at a maddening
      pace, sifting through nearly 80,000 suggestions to present a report in 29
      days. Only so these can be looked at by our MPs in time for the next
      Parliament session. Which is where Brinda Karat of the the CPM asked the
      obvious: "Whether the government has the will to implement these
      recommendations is the real question."

      Revati Laul is a Special Correspondent with Tehelka.

      A. Thiagarajan
      98490 22573

    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.