Attention: Starting December 14, 2019 Yahoo Groups will no longer host user created content on its sites. New content can no longer be uploaded after October 28, 2019. Sending/Receiving email functionality is not going away, you can continue to communicate via any email client with your group members. Learn More
- Feb 7, 2013I still don't see the point. Are you making a philosophical point? -- How to reconcile such an example with 'religion within the limits of reliigion alone'? If you arent reconciling them than are you just handing out trivia?Omar
From: Un Known <new_idea_2007@...>
To: "kant-l@yahoogroups.com" <kant-l@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, February 7, 2013 10:50 PM
Subject: Re: [kant-l] Re: Kant's God
Omar,I wasn't giving a philosophical argument. In the matter of Kant's religion there are two views to consider: the Kant thatwrote about an intellectual concept of "God," and the Kant that fell to his knees and praised God when he observeda swallow casting its babies out of the nest to their inevitable deaths."The personal influences on Kant are neither here nor there where philosophical argument is concerned, or ad hominems would count.Subjective necessity has a specific meaning in critical philosophy: it refers to reflective judgment, the subject specifically of the third Critique. We can't prove God's existence, but can show why it provides a crucial moral appendage to a reason that demands that what we ought to do, we should see as being possible to accomplish, when all the facts seem otherwise. Reflective judgement, which has no power to guarantee such a result, still allows us to count as rational in the expectation." - << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>