Re: The State of JSON
--- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "Douglas Crockford" <douglas@c...> wrote:
> I don't anticipate any further changes to JSON. The only additional
> feature I can foresee would be support for cyclical structures. This
> would not be possible in an ECMAScript subset, so the result would not
> be JSON.
Indeed. I would certainly use JSON if it contained cyclical
you could elaborate on this, maybe even show us some examples of how
you would consider implementing this?