Re: [json] jabsorb 1.2.2 released
>I'm not a DWR expert, but from what I understand, both libraries fulfill the
> On Jan 16, 2008 11:07 PM, Martin Cooper <mfncooper@...> wrote:
> On Jan 16, 2008 4:19 PM, Arthur Blake <arthur.blake@...<arthur.blake%40gmail.com>>
> > I'm very pleased to announce the release of jabsorb 1.2.2.
> > jabsorb is a simple and lightweight (yet quite powerful) Ajax/Web
> > 2.0framework that allows you to call methods in a Java web application
> > from
> > residing directly in the browser.
> That sounds a lot like DWR. Can you provide a brief comparison?
> Martin Cooper
same basic purposes.
The main difference that I've always touted is:
jabsorb is based on JSON-RPC standard (although with new circular references
support, standard JSON-RPC is extended)
DWR uses it's own inherent protocol, but new JSON features are being added.
DWR also has some built in support for reverse ajax. This can be done with
jabsorb too, but it's not as integrated like it is with DWR.
DWR appears to have a larger code base and more bells and whistles, while
jabsorb is a bit lighter and simpler.
So it appears that the libraries are currently converging in their feature
Both jabsorb and DWR have been been around for quite awhile. jabsorb was
formerly known as JSON-RPC-Java. (It was originally forked off of
JSON-RPC-Java, but then the parent project joined jabsorb to form a unified
project, yet retaining the jabsorb name.)
It would be nice to hear some pros and cons from anyone who has used both
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]