Re: [json] Re: JSON representation of common types
- Out of band data for creating types in other languages which don't
data, which can still be encoded as json.
It should be easy enough to take your objects before json encoding,
and run them through a function to turn them into wrapper objects, the
additional data you need being stored in properties, without polluting
json or json-rpc directly.
Assuming you know that the consumer of the data needs these additional
suggestions as to type election, otherwise as Andy said that `burden`
should be on the decoder to figure it out.
Matthew P. C. Morley
MPCM Technologies Inc.