Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: [json] Re: Media type for JSON?

Expand Messages
  • Martin Cooper
    ... So? We re talking about JSON, not XML. Finding an example for which you disagree with the existing categorisation isn t much of a reason to not follow the
    Message 1 of 13 , Jul 29, 2005
    View Source
    • 0 Attachment
      On 7/29/05, Mark Miller <markm@...> wrote:
      > Martin Cooper wrote:
      > > The usage patterns may be different, but if you read the portions of
      > > RFC 2046 that I quoted, those usage patterns still match
      > > application/json much better than text/json.
      >
      >
      > By the criteria you quoted, xml should be application/xml.

      So? We're talking about JSON, not XML. Finding an example for which
      you disagree with the existing categorisation isn't much of a reason
      to not follow the spec when looking for the right categorisation for
      JSON.

      --
      Martin Cooper


      >
      > --
      > Text by me above is hereby placed in the public domain
      >
      > Cheers,
      > --MarkM
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      > Yahoo! Groups Links
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.