Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: [json] Re: Media type for JSON?

Expand Messages
  • Mark Miller
    ... By the criteria you quoted, xml should be application/xml. -- Text by me above is hereby placed in the public domain Cheers, --MarkM
    Message 1 of 13 , Jul 29, 2005
    • 0 Attachment
      Martin Cooper wrote:
      > The usage patterns may be different, but if you read the portions of
      > RFC 2046 that I quoted, those usage patterns still match
      > application/json much better than text/json.


      By the criteria you quoted, xml should be application/xml.


      --
      Text by me above is hereby placed in the public domain

      Cheers,
      --MarkM
    • Martin Cooper
      ... So? We re talking about JSON, not XML. Finding an example for which you disagree with the existing categorisation isn t much of a reason to not follow the
      Message 2 of 13 , Jul 29, 2005
      • 0 Attachment
        On 7/29/05, Mark Miller <markm@...> wrote:
        > Martin Cooper wrote:
        > > The usage patterns may be different, but if you read the portions of
        > > RFC 2046 that I quoted, those usage patterns still match
        > > application/json much better than text/json.
        >
        >
        > By the criteria you quoted, xml should be application/xml.

        So? We're talking about JSON, not XML. Finding an example for which
        you disagree with the existing categorisation isn't much of a reason
        to not follow the spec when looking for the right categorisation for
        JSON.

        --
        Martin Cooper


        >
        > --
        > Text by me above is hereby placed in the public domain
        >
        > Cheers,
        > --MarkM
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >
        > Yahoo! Groups Links
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >
      Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.