Re: [json] Re: JSON Propositions
- On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 5:38 PM, douglascrockford <douglas@...> wrote:
> --- In firstname.lastname@example.org, Tatu Saloranta <tsaloranta@...> wrote:What a great idea -- instead of having comments in where they belong,
>> Comments are perhaps the single one thing I really wish JSON had,
>> omission of which was IMO a grave mistake for any textual format.
> I'll say this one more time: If you want comments, then pipe JSMin in front of your JSON parser. You don't need a new standard.
format spec, add a non-standard pre-processor. I really miss C coding.
I am not advocate of a new format, but I am highly critical of this
one big flaw in JSON spec.
But that's that, it's not in the spec, and not much can be done about it.
-+ Tatu +-
- The beauty and usefulness of JSON is in my opinion more of what they left
out than what they took in.
Any attempts to extend it is to make it less useful.
2012/7/10 johnnys <marler8997@...>
> I've published a web page with some propositions to modify JSON at
> http://json.marler.info <http://json.marler.info>
> I wanted to post this so I could see what people think of these
> propositions. Any comments/suggestions/criticism are welcome.
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
� e-mail: jonas.tarnstrom@...
� skype: full name "Jonas T�rnstr�m"
� phone: +46 (0)734 231 552
ESN Social Software AB
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]