Re: [json] JSON Propositions
- Thanks for taking the time to write your propositions and post here. I
agree with others here, Jos making the same points I would (though I
don't care for YAML myself).
I maintain the REBOL JSON library and, like Ben, like the idea of
comments. They used to be there, and I only removed support for them
after Douglas Crockford confirmed that they would never come back, and
that JSON was meant for machines (e.g. serialization), not humans
(e.g. configs). I wish Prop II were the standard, but understand the
reason it isn't.
- The beauty and usefulness of JSON is in my opinion more of what they left
out than what they took in.
Any attempts to extend it is to make it less useful.
2012/7/10 johnnys <marler8997@...>
> I've published a web page with some propositions to modify JSON at
> http://json.marler.info <http://json.marler.info>
> I wanted to post this so I could see what people think of these
> propositions. Any comments/suggestions/criticism are welcome.
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
� e-mail: jonas.tarnstrom@...
� skype: full name "Jonas T�rnstr�m"
� phone: +46 (0)734 231 552
ESN Social Software AB
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]