Re: [json] Universal Binary JSON Specification
- On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 6:15 AM, rkalla123 <rkalla@...> wrote:
> Hey Guys,You might be interested in an existing such specification called
> I am currently working on what I hope to be a 1:1 binary JSON specification (no custom data types supported like BSON or BJSON, just binary representations of the core JSON spec) and would appreciate a few extra eyes on it if anyone had interest in reading through the 2nd draft:
which was specified about a year ago, has Java and C implementations,
and used by a few projects/products like ElasticSearch.
And for performance, Smile has been included on jvm-serializer
benchmark for a while now, using Jackson data binding.
-+ Tatu +-
- On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 9:42 AM, rkalla123 <rkalla@...> wrote:
> Stephan,For what it is worth, I also consider support for only signed values a
> No problem; your feedback are still very applicable and much appreciated.
> The additional view-point on the signed/unsigned issue was exactly what I was hoping for. My primary goal has always been simplicity and I know at least from the Java world, going with unsigned values would have made the impl distinctly *not* simple (and an annoying API).
> So I am glad to get some validation there that I am not alienating every other language at the cost of Java.
-+ Tatu +-