Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

51Re: AJAJ?

Expand Messages
  • Dale
    Aug 9, 2005
    • 0 Attachment
      --- In json@yahoogroups.com, "George" <georgenava@y...> wrote:
      > No need to rename it, as I have always said, AJAX goes for Async
      > JSON And XUL

      Unless someone has finally written the XUL HTC for IE or an XSLT for
      XUL for non-Gecko browsers, XUL is too non-standard and niche for my

      Interesting thought though is to pass a JSON structure and have it
      interpreted to XUL on the fly... I have done that with JS-to-HTML and
      XML-to-HTML (without XSLT). The lighter weight of JSON and its
      representation in memory makes it better suited than XML, that is for
    • Show all 8 messages in this topic