205Re: Reference Implementations
- Jan 11, 2006
> > into a JSON system.
> So why doesn't the same argument fly for any JSON parser implementation,
in response to complaints that it was not optimal. My intention was to
make it as fast as possible while still conforming to the standard. I
believe that it does that.
But it is just one possible implementation. If you want to write one
that is bigger and slower that responds to non-JSON texts as well as
JSON texts, you are certainly allowed to do so.
> > JSON is a strict subset of...YAMLThe statement is not true...yet. YAML has two productions in which
> Can you absolutely confirm this? Is it true today? I have not seen
> this claim anywhere.
spaces are significant where in JSON they are not. I hope they can
resolve that soon.
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>