1782Re: [json] c++ library benchmark
- Nov 23, 2011This benchmark seems to test the wrong thing. A library that is lazy in
parsing and pre-serializes on each update would likely perform poorly in
real operation but would outperform all others according to this benchmark.
On Nov 22, 2011 4:09 PM, "jonathan wallace" <ninja9578@...> wrote:
> I was sent a message on sourceforge a while ago about someone doing a
> benchmark test of the most popular c++ json libraries.
> He compared json_spirit (Boost), CAJUN, and libjson. He attempted to
> include jsoncpp in his tests, but said he couldn't get it to compile.
> I was sent the results this weekend:
> I was surprised that json_spirit performed so poorly considering it's part
> of Boost. CAJUN ran more than five times faster than it and libjson ran
> almost FIVE HUNDRED times faster than it.
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>