1050Re: JSON syntax grammar is missing 'undefined' literal value
- May 25, 2008--- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "Shelby Moore" <shelby@...> wrote:
> I am working on an implicit schema for JSON (to enable Web 3.0JSON will not be extended to include undefined. Your options are to
> decentralized mashups) and I am thinking of declaring undefined to be
> a legal value and usurp your defacto standard. Could you please steer
> me otherwise with further logic?
either accept the definition of JSON as it is, or to create your own
format. If you do the latter, please don't call it JSON.
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>