Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Messages List

2008

VFPJson moved to Github Hi: We have just move VFPJson repository to https://github.com/sait/vfpjson https://github.com/sait/vfpjson Please update URL in http://www.json.org/

igtztorero
Feb 15
#2008
 

Messages List

2007

New software tool & json.org question I'm not sure if anyone on this list is in scientific computing, but I'd just like to draw your attention to a json library that I contribute to for Modern

Zaak Beekman
Jan 17
#2007
 

Messages List

2006

json-fortran I don't know who to contact, but the one resource listed under the Fortran section of json.org is quite lacking in terms of capabilities, especially when

Izaak Beekman
Jan 17
#2006
 

Messages List

2004

Re: null for objects ... That's a little bit of an odd statement, you are thinking the other way around: JSON itself does not determine or impose what the type of a value should be

wjosdejong
Dec 9, 2014
#2004
 

Messages List

2003

Re: null for objects Hi! ... Huh? The standard doesn’t conflict with that. It doesn’t say “one or more name/value pairs”, it says “zero or more name/value pairs”. {}

Andrea Faulds
Dec 8, 2014
#2003
 

Messages List

2002

Re: null for objects {} means an empty object. JSON doesn't say what null means.

douglascrockford
Dec 8, 2014
#2002
 

Messages List

2001

null for objects Dear Colleagues, In looking at the JSON standard http://www.ecma-international. org/publications/files/ECMA- ST/ECMA-404.pdf

ivan.voronov
Dec 8, 2014
#2001
 

Messages List

2000

Re: Json+ Looking at the json+ example: { Products:(Id, Sku, Name)[ {1, "11235", "ABC Notebook pc"}, {2, "2358", "CDE Desktop pc"} ] } Couldn't it be expressed in valid

Sergey Lyubka
Dec 4, 2014
#2000
 

Messages List

1999

Re: Json+ Looking at the json+ example: { Products:(Id, Sku, Name)[ {1, "11235", "ABC Notebook pc"}, {2, "2358", "CDE Desktop pc"} ] } Couldn't it be expressed in valid

Sergey Lyubka
Dec 4, 2014
#1999
 

Messages List

1998

Re: Json+ ... Hmm, this is a bit weird since it’s not a subset of JS syntax, unlike JSON. If it was written as one, it would be more useful as it could be instantly

Andrea Faulds
Dec 3, 2014
#1998
 

Messages List

1997

Re: Json+ you can also use a prototype reviver ( i.e. https://gist.github.com/WebReflection/87e41c09691edf9432da ) and use the somehow virtually reserved ( since it

Andrea Giammarchi
Dec 3, 2014
#1997
 

Messages List

1996

Re: Json+ Yusuf,Thanks for sharing. One feedback I have is that www.jsonplus.org doesn't really talk about "why". Why is it needed? Useful? I think it will help

Yasser Asmi
Dec 3, 2014
#1996
 

Messages List

1995

Re: Json+ ... JSON-LD exists, is good at expressing type information, and is a W3C world standard (and doesn't require you to replace JSON): JSON-LD W3C specification:

Manu Sporny
Dec 3, 2014
#1995
 

Messages List

1994

Re: Json+ That's an interesting idea. However it will be almost impossible to convince the whole world of using this new standard instead of JSON. I myself was thinking

wjosdejong
Dec 3, 2014
#1994
 

Messages List

1992

Json+ I did a study for the development json and I published it at www.jsonplus.org

yusufgamsiz
Dec 3, 2014
#1992
 
View First Topic Go to View Last Topic
Loading 1 - 15 of total 2,008 messages