Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: Just got confused with the `?` operator

Expand Messages
  • douglascrockford
    ... Thanks. Please try it now.
    Message 1 of 8 , Feb 5, 2013
    • 0 Attachment
      --- In jslint_com@yahoogroups.com, "Felix E. Klee" wrote:
      > /*jslint devel: true */
      >
      > (function () {
      > 'use strict';
      >
      > var isOneWayFlight = true, i;
      >
      > for (i = 0; i < isOneWayFlight ? 1 : 2; i += 1) {
      > console.log(i);
      > }
      > }());
      >
      > Instead, the runtime enters an infinite loop. It outputs: 0, 1, 2, ...
      >
      > Correct version of the for statement, doing what I want:
      >
      > for (i = 0; i < (isOneWayFlight ? 1 : 2); i += 1) {
      > console.log(i);
      > }


      Thanks. Please try it now.
    • george_weilenmann
      Nice compromise. Works great and indeed improves readability.
      Message 2 of 8 , Feb 5, 2013
      • 0 Attachment
        Nice compromise. Works great and indeed improves readability.

        --- In jslint_com@yahoogroups.com, "Felix E. Klee" wrote:
        >
        > Well, today I'm not in good shape, and I expected the following code to
        > output just one zero. The code passes JSLint.
        >
        > /*jslint devel: true */
        >
        > (function () {
        > 'use strict';
        >
        > var isOneWayFlight = true, i;
        >
        > for (i = 0; i < isOneWayFlight ? 1 : 2; i += 1) {
        > console.log(i);
        > }
        > }());
        >
        > Instead, the runtime enters an infinite loop. It outputs: 0, 1, 2, ...
        >
        > Correct version of the for statement, doing what I want:
        >
        > for (i = 0; i < (isOneWayFlight ? 1 : 2); i += 1) {
        > console.log(i);
        > }
        >
        > That's just FYI.
        >
      • Felix E. Klee
        ... So quick - thanks! :-)
        Message 3 of 8 , Feb 7, 2013
        • 0 Attachment
          On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 3:47 AM, douglascrockford <douglas@...> wrote:
          > Please try it now.

          So quick - thanks! :-)
        Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.