Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: [jslint] Re: Lines numbers in error report seem to be off in latest version

Expand Messages
  • Sean Kelly
    OK, I updated the page, let me know if it looks right. On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 7:41 AM, mariana.schiff ... [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
    Message 1 of 16 , Apr 4 10:43 AM
    • 0 Attachment
      OK, I updated the page, let me know if it looks right.

      On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 7:41 AM, mariana.schiff
      <Mariana.Schiff@...>wrote:

      > **
      >
      >
      > I modified the wsh.js code to, basically, put "the fix" back in.
      >
      > Replace the line
      >
      > source = file.ReadAll();
      >
      > with the following:
      >
      > source = File.ReadAll()
      > .replace(/\r\n/g, '\n')
      > .replace(/\r/g, '\n')
      > .split('\n');
      >
      > I hope it makes sense. It works well for us.
      >
      > --- In jslint_com@yahoogroups.com, "cse_html_validator" <alhome@...>
      > wrote:
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > > --- In jslint_com@yahoogroups.com, Sean Kelly <home@> wrote:
      > > >
      > > > You might look at node.js This has become my "go to" solution for
      > running
      > > > JavaScript locally.
      > >
      > > Thanks. I looked at it briefly, but I need an equivalent replacement for
      > the code I posted in "Is there a node.js equivalent for wsh.js?". If I can
      > get that, then I may switch, especially if it's faster or lighter weight
      > than using WSH (which I suspect it is).
      > >
      >
      >
      >


      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
    • mariana.schiff
      Looks great (I had misspelled file ). Thanks for the credit, Mariana
      Message 2 of 16 , Apr 4 10:51 AM
      • 0 Attachment
        Looks great (I had misspelled 'file').

        Thanks for the credit,

        Mariana

        --- In jslint_com@yahoogroups.com, Sean Kelly <home@...> wrote:
        >
        > OK, I updated the page, let me know if it looks right.
        >
        > On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 7:41 AM, mariana.schiff
        > <Mariana.Schiff@...>wrote:
        >
        > > **
        > >
        > >
        > > I modified the wsh.js code to, basically, put "the fix" back in.
        > >
        > > Replace the line
        > >
        > > source = file.ReadAll();
        > >
        > > with the following:
        > >
        > > source = File.ReadAll()
        > > .replace(/\r\n/g, '\n')
        > > .replace(/\r/g, '\n')
        > > .split('\n');
        > >
        > > I hope it makes sense. It works well for us.
        > >
        > > --- In jslint_com@yahoogroups.com, "cse_html_validator" <alhome@>
        > > wrote:
        > > >
        > > >
        > > >
        > > > --- In jslint_com@yahoogroups.com, Sean Kelly <home@> wrote:
        > > > >
        > > > > You might look at node.js This has become my "go to" solution for
        > > running
        > > > > JavaScript locally.
        > > >
        > > > Thanks. I looked at it briefly, but I need an equivalent replacement for
        > > the code I posted in "Is there a node.js equivalent for wsh.js?". If I can
        > > get that, then I may switch, especially if it's faster or lighter weight
        > > than using WSH (which I suspect it is).
        > > >
        > >
        > >
        > >
        >
        >
        > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
        >
      Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.