Re: [feature-request] Browser-support based option groups
- --- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "Kai" <blafasel@...> wrote:
> I don't like that idea. JS in web context is for all browsers. ThereI like "rope of sand". That is a good metaphor.
> is either "good" JS following certain rules (which ones might be a
> different topic) or "bad" JS voilating them. What's the use of JSLint
> not complaining about bad code that is fatal to FF or any other
> browser just because user marked "IE6+" checkbox only?
> This option would create a rope of sand
> (rope if sand is a suggestion of my online translator, dunno if it's
> correct) What it means is a felt reliability that isn't really there