Re: [John_Lit] Gospel of John Movie?
- Excellent point, Mark (and effectively challenging the basis for seeing chs.
15-17 as an addition--George Parsenios would appreciate that), although I'm
still inclined to stay with Barnabas Lindars on the supplementary material
plausibly added later, and this being a part of it. It could indeed be "the
sermon in the alley" (or, in the vineyard) after all (although the text does
not claim such).
An engaging feature regarding John 7 and 8 is the use of hyperbole and
humor--the Jerusalem crowd's laughing about Jesus regarding claims to be
greater/older than Moses/Abraham are laced with humor in ways that seem
One feature that also works extremely well is the presentation of flashbacks
to things that had happened/been said earlier in the narrative. The
rendering of such in black and white is especially effective, functioning to
give the impressions of echoes of earlier material.
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 6:26 PM, Mark Goodacre <Goodacre@...> wrote:
> I've occasionally used clips of it in teaching, Paul. There are lots of
> things to like about it. One masterstroke is the way it deals with the
> apparent narrative seam at 14.31 (par. Mark 14.42 // Matt. 26.46), "Come
> now, let us leave" before Jesus goes on for another three chapters. Jesus
> and the disciples all get up, leave where they were eating and go outside
> into the garden, look at the vines, and Jesus says, "I am the true vine; my
> father is the gardener" (15.1)! I really like the fact that the narrative
> constraints of the film (to tell it sequentially) force them to provide a
> dramatically workable, narratively coherent solution to one of the oddities
> in the text.
> All best
> On 29 March 2011 18:29, Paul Anderson <panderso@...> wrote:
> > Dear Colleagues,
> > I've been using (for a second year) the Gospel of John in local church
> > settings, dividing it up into six half-hour sessions in which we watch 30
> > minutes or so of the film and spend another 20-30 minutes discussing
> > we have seen and heard." The discussions have been really engaging, and
> > they
> > provide a springboard into critical issues as well as applicational ones
> > quite readily.
> > Have others used this film or others effectively, and if so, any comments
> > on
> > what is helpful for popular audiences?
> > Thanks so much!
> > Paul Anderson
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> Mark Goodacre
> Duke University
> Department of Religion
> Gray Building / Box 90964
> Durham, NC 27708-0964 USA
> Phone: 919-660-3503 Fax: 919-660-3530
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> SUBSCRIBE: e-mail firstname.lastname@example.org
> UNSUBSCRIBE: e-mail email@example.com
> PROBLEMS?: e-mail firstname.lastname@example.org
> MESSAGE ARCHIVE:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/johannine_literature/messagesYahoo! Groups
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]