Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

An Open Note to the Moderator

Expand Messages
  • GustavSym@aol.com
    Dear Jack: While the number of February s messages (139) far exceeds the monthly average (about 70) for this project, I cannot help but notice the sudden
    Message 1 of 1 , Feb 15, 2003
    • 0 Attachment
      Dear Jack:

      While the number of February's messages (139) far exceeds the monthly average
      (about 70) for this project, I cannot help but notice the sudden cessation of
      communication since your intervention closing the active threads. Or have I
      participated in the fallacy of proximity here, missing the natural rhythm of
      the list?

      As a member (actually, as quite a new member) of the list, I was mildly
      disappointed in the occasional questionable personal remarks scattered
      throughout, and I wonder if these remarks led you to halt postings. You seem
      to have been most effective in meeting the goal of quieting things down, but
      did you intend what seems to be a chilling effect?

      I should also ask if the discussion's turn toward semiotics had a chilling
      effect on you. I can appreciate how some approaches to the Johannine material
      question the validity of semiosis; indeed, the historical and textual critics
      on the list are likely predisposed to be suspicious of anthing that begins in
      structuralism. Nonetheless, I agree that literary theory qua literary theory
      should not be the emphasis. I hope I did not contribute to anyone's
      discomfiture so early in my stay on John_Lit, yet I remain convinced that
      breaking new ground usually involves a modicum of angst. My analysis of the
      discussion was meant to bring the relationship between authors and texts into
      sharper focus, nothing more.

      Perhaps if you were to share your views on how and where the discussion
      should proceed, the membership might adjust its commentary and demeanor.

      I had hoped to engage Johannine literature not only objectively, but
      intersubjectively, as the latter tends to inform readers more about the
      phenomena of texts and about methodology than the former.

      Best Regards,

      Joseph Calandrino

      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.