Re: canonical writings (was: Beloved Disciple passages in ms Pepys)
- John Lupia writes:
> Richard,You haven't heard me 'hollering' that Pepys is genuine, have you?
> In any debate including court trials it is always a strategic ploy to get
> your opponent into an argument where they loose whether you are right or
> wrong. In this case the more you, Yuri and anyone else hollers "all the
> more loudly" that the Testament of Job cannot be canonical the more they
> agree that Pepys ms. cannot ne what Yuri claims it is since the two
> constitute the same line of reasoning. It was not intended to be funny nor
> rude and your thinking it was such proves you missed the point.
Actually I don't think it is, and as I don't have time to learn Middle
English and read up the literature, I generally keep well clear. So who's in
the argument he can't win?