RE: [jasspa] Why go nano when you can go micro?
>Having said that uemacs v4 for windows (which is the only version supporting
> Having said that we have still not achieved the
> small footprint size that I would like which is
> <100K. There is a lot more baggage now which makes
> it more difficult to reduce.
long file names etc) is 469Kb, i.e. larger and JASSPAs MicroEmacs so ne32 at
<200kb is significantly smaller than uemacs!