2654Re: [jasspa] how different is jasspa microemacs and the uemacs?
- Jul 21 3:46 PMOn 21/07/2011 17:38, isaacpei wrote:
> Hello,Hi Issac,
> after using microemacs (jasspa version), I have to say, it's a GREAT piece of software - I had thrown python, ruby, and R codes into it, suprisingly everything works out of the box!
> I am curious how different is jasspa version vs. the uemacsWell the jasspa version was based on uemacs but was forked a long time ago
(refer to the history that is on the site).
It is quite diverged now, the main difference in the macro language and
features such as syntax highlighting, indentation etc.
There are also some differences in the key strokes which have migrate in some
ways towards GNU Emacs for certain commands. There is a compatibility mode that
will turn the keyboard commands back to uemacs if that is what you prefer.
> Another question is: is there active development on microemacs (jasspa version)? and if there is, it's in the macro side, or in the c side? thanksThere is still active development, although very slowly these days, it depends
how busy we are as to how much time we can spend on it (i.e. it does not pay
the rent). There are no critical issues pending at the moment in the code and
it is generally robust (well there are a couple of issues but most people would
be hard pressed to find them just doing normal editing).
Most of the development is macro code since we can do most new things with
macros rather than writing native code. However the C code is modified from
time to time either bug fixes or new features or extensions. Development is
driven by requirements, so if there are no new requirements then we do not
There are some bug fixes and a few new features that we have not had time to
release just yet which we really ought to some time.
As for your question on Lua, the answer is no. I have pondered on Lua for some
time and considered that it would be a nice to include, however the amount of
re-work that would be required is quite huge (assuming that Lua displaced the
existing macros). I was not sure that it was worth the effort as it would
initially be a huge step backwards before it went forwards. But I do agree that
LUA would be a good engine choice were we starting out today.
Anyway thanks for your comments.
> Best regards,
> This is an unmoderated list, but new members are moderated to ensure that there are no spam users. JASSPA is not responsible for the content of
> any material posted to this list.
> To un-subscribe, send a mail message to
> or visit http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jasspa and
> modify your account settings manually.
> Yahoo! Groups Links
- << Previous post in topic