Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Viewing the Tip of the Prosecutorial Misconduct Iceberg

Expand Messages
  • jail4judges
    J.A.I.L. News Journal _____________________________________________________ Los Angeles, California July 13,
    Message 1 of 1 , Jul 13, 2003
      J.A.I.L. News Journal
      Los Angeles, California                                                   July 13, 2003 

      Viewing the Tip of the Prosecutorial Misconduct Iceberg

      Court cases raise conduct concerns: 
      USA TODAY,
      Thursday, June 26, 2003

      Analysts look at the ethical line that's crossed when the desire to win
      turns zealous prosecution into misconduct The star witness in a case that
      has been called the worst miscarriage of justice in Texas history got all
      the headlines recently, after a judge found that he lied in court in order
      to convict 38 people -- 36 of them black -- on drug charges.

      But the district attorney in the dusty Texas Panhandle town of Tulia knew that undercover cop Tom Coleman was lying on the witness stand, and he did nothing to correct the record, according to a scathing, 129-page critique of the original trials written by a judge who reviewed the cases for a state appeals court.

      Swisher County District Attorney Terry McEachern's silence, as well as his failure to turn over information that could have discredited Coleman, meant that ''it would be a travesty of justice to permit the convictions to
      stand,'' retired Dallas judge Ron Chapman said in his report. Last week,
      Chapman ordered that 12 of the defendants be released from prison.

      The Tulia case is an extreme example of prosecutorial misconduct, which legal analysts say is not as rare as it should be in America's criminal justice system. It is virtually impossible to quantify how often misconduct occurs. But analysts say prosecutors mischaracterize, conceal or tamper with evidence, make inflammatory remarks or behave improperly in court often enough to cause concern.

      Two recent research projects have shed light on the problem:

      * The Center for Public Integrity, an ethics watchdog group in Washington studied more than 11,000 cases involving alleged prosecutorial misconduct since 1970. The group found that in more than 2,000 of the cases, convictions were reversed or reduced because of misconduct. The study found a pattern of misconduct by local prosecutors in nearly every state.

      ''Year after year, there is conduct that either leads to a new trial for a
      guilty person, which uses public resources and sabotages confidence in the system, or leads to conviction of an innocent person,'' says Steve Weinberg, who oversaw the study.

      * The Innocence Project, which uses DNA testing to try to exonerate
      convicted felons, found that 34 of the first 70 defendants it had helped to exonerate had been subject to prosecutorial misconduct. Peter Neufeld, co-founder of the project, says DNA testing has provided a window through which prosecutors' conduct can be examined closely. ''But I assure you, it hasn't just happened in these cases,'' he says.
      ''A prosecutor has a higher calling than just to win. He's got a duty to do
      justice,'' says Ted Killory, a commercial litigator in Washington who worked on the appeals of the Tulia defendants. ''It's essential for our system to work that prosecutors not be just about racking up wins.''

      And yet, certain prosecutors, focused on winning, sometimes cross the
      ethical line. Some who campaigned for office by touting their conviction
      rates succumb to the pressure to keep up with their statistics. ....
      The study by the Center for Public Integrity is one of the most
      comprehensive to date. Weinberg headed a team that spent three years
      researching 11,458 appellate court decisions in all 2,341 state prosecutor
      jurisdictions in the country. The team did not examine federal prosecutors' conduct.

      In the cases studied, 223 prosecutors were cited by judges for two or more instances of misconduct. Two prosecutors were disbarred for mishandling cases.

      ''Prosecutors are the last sacred cow,'' Weinberg says. ''They are
      unaccountable. Who is the boss of the prosecutor? You could say the voters, but in most jurisdictions, most voters can't name the prosecutor.''

      In Texas, Coleman faces trial this fall on perjury charges. McEachern has not been sanctioned for his role in the Tulia convictions.

      In the end, McEachern may answer only to the voters. He has been in office since 1982. The Texas Bar Association will not say whether it is
      investigating him. The bar has the authority to suspend him or strip him of his law license.

      The original Tulia criminal cases are being reviewed by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. If the court recommends new trials, special prosecutor Rod Hobson says he will dismiss the charges because they are based entirely on Coleman's testimony.

      Coleman worked alone for 18 months in Tulia and infiltrated a local drug
      ring in the town's black neighborhood. He kept no written records, wore no wire, filmed no video, produced no other witnesses or corroborating
      evidence. No drugs, paraphernalia or money were seized during the arrests. Without his testimony, the cases would have collapsed.

      It is not clear precisely how much McEachern knew about Coleman's background before he put him on the witness stand. But in his report, Judge Chapman noted that McEachern ''knew or should have
      known'' that Coleman had a reputation for dishonesty, had fled bad debts, had been arrested for theft, had walked off previous law enforcement jobs and was considered untrustworthy by law enforcement officials in other counties. That information should have been provided to defense lawyers, Chapman wrote, but it was not. McEachern did not respond to a telephone request for an interview. His assistant says he has been referring calls to Hobson, the special prosecutor.

      During one trial in July 2000, Coleman testified that he had never been
      arrested. In fact, he had been arrested in 1998 for allegedly stealing

      According to his own affidavit, McEachern was aware of the arrest before any of the original Tulia defendants was indicted. During one of the trials in 2000, McEachern said he participated in Coleman's background check.

      He also defended Coleman in court, noting in one of the trials that Coleman had been named Texas' outstanding law enforcement officer of the year in 2000. ''If you can't believe him, well, then who can you believe?'' McEachern was quoted as saying at the time.

      In his deposition three months ago, McEachern said he did not participate in the background check.

      A recent hearing to reconsider four of the original Tulia convictions was
      halted when two special prosecutors appointed to handle the case agreed with defense lawyers that Coleman lied on the stand and that the defendants should be released.

      J.A.I.L.- Judicial Accountability Initiative Law - www.jail4judges.org
      JAIL is a unique addition to our form of gov't. heretofore unrealized.
      JAIL is powerful! JAIL is dynamic! JAIL is America's ONLY hope!
      JAIL is taking America like a wildfire! AddRemove@...
      JAIL is making inroads into Congress for federal accountability!
      E-Groups sign on at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jail4judges/join
      Get involved at JAIL_SALE_USA-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
      Donate offerings to J.A.I.L., P.O. Box 207, N. Hollywood, CA 91603
      "Give me your wealth, and I will give you America"  - Ron Branson
      "..it does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds.." - Samuel Adams
      "There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one who is
      striking at the root."                         -- Henry David Thoreau    <><
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.