Law School - Sowing the
Seeds of Judicial Corruption
Students are taught that law is not
what the Law says,
but what the Court says the law
J.A.I.L. will end this
Another red letter day in
the law was when I heard that the judge who cheated me out of $100,000
claimed that although he broke the law, he was "immune." I asked the court
how this could possibly be Constitutional. They said that "judges have
-- Lawrence C.
[By Lawrence C. Agee, Oregon
I appreciated the post from JAILer Jim L. [Jim
Lorenz, Utah] He stayed in law school one year. This is my
I chose to go to law school after being defrauded by
lawyers three times. I
agree with Jim. The professors speak of "the
law" and pontificate that they
know "the law." Yet when some are
challenged with "the law" they often seem to find an excuse why "the law"
does not apply. Most professors will not look you in the eye when they are
forced to explain why "the law" has clearly failed in a case. There is
always an excuse to justify their position.
To illustrate, I
was once insulted by my Contracts professor when I
challenged why a man who was not a father was forced to pay child support
for a child determined not to be his. I still do not
I was speaking to a student the other day who is
taking immigration law.
There is a test that immigrants take to become
U.S. citizens. She asked me
one of the questions on the exam "what is
the supreme law of the land?" I
answered "the Constitution, of
course." This was correct! Yet, I am amazed to see the Constitution is
rarely mentioned in law school, except in Con Law.
I met a man at the judicial retention hearings I attended. He
was an immigrant from Sicily, has a great family, 3 nice kids. He took that
oath. The lawyers foreclosed on his home after a $66,000 judgment against
him for asking his neighbors not to run over his children. Of course the
money that may have sent his kids to college is now in the pocket of a
lawyer who shortly thereafter dropped dead. He will tell you the
Constitution looks like a good document but the judges didn't acknowledge
it. He calls it "the big lie." He is now very regretful he came to
I recalled one of my own cases. When I had my opportunity
to present my side of a case in 1998, I began to speak. After 3 minutes, I
was cut off. An award of $100,000 was given, essentially sending me into
bankruptcy. I said this was unconstitutional. They said it was not. My
appellate lawyer told me "hey, people lose $70,000 in the stock market
everyday" and to "put it behind you." I told him what I thought of
him and walked out of his office. (The award has subsequently grown to 100k
due to 12% interest on the lien on my home which I can't pay). Of course,
when it came to the $700 balance on his $10,000 bill, there was no limit to
the extremes he would go to to collect "what was his." And of course he
dumped my case before the appeal was completed.
other thing I was always dismayed to hear were the comments by
numerous other lawyers: "Perjury, ha! It happens all the time." I walked
out of several other offices upon hearing this. This is contrary to the
learned in legal ethics. I guess real lawyers quickly forget
Another red letter day in the law was when I heard
that the judge who cheated me out of $100,000 claimed that although he
broke the law, he was "immune." I asked the court how this could possibly
be Constitutional. They said that "judges have absolute immunity." Then
they said something about saying some magic words and I didn't understand
how the magic words made a difference. The judge who cheated me by the way,
sits on the
"Supreme Court" of the state where this occurred and it
would seem to me that he must have heard of "due process." Apparently
The topper though was when they cheated me out of my ability
to earn a
living. I guess suing judges is frowned upon in our society.
I understand the
"public interest" demands that judges be left alone
so they can do their jobs. I wonder why I am not entitled to the same
considerations? I guess that
old "equal protection clause" is also a
They tell us here in law school we must learn
to "think like lawyers." I don't seem to be getting the hang of it. I'm now
$40,000 poorer, but I still think perjury is wrong and that there is no
reason to protect judges who help their lawyer buddies steal money. I guess
I am just a little slow. I guess both Jim and I see somthing the rest of
Lawrence C. Agee
[Response from Dave Donley, Vermont
Looks good, Dr. Agee. We need to educate the
public and shatter the myths. This could be another example of how the www.jail4judges.org web site benefits us
all with public education, awareness and providing a "gathering
the enemies of our enemies- corrupt treasonous, thieving, lying judges and
lawyers serving their self-serving agendas rather than the "ends of
or public welfare!!!
Have you found the copies of the letters I
sent former Governor Dean and Gerry Spence yet? I quoted from Spence's book,
"With Justice for None - Destroying a Great American Myth," some of his thoughts
about misinformed, self-aggrandizing and deluded law professors. There is
much fodder there for destroying the myth that the courts are halls of justice.
Vermont Bar Journals attached to the Spence letter demonstrate the
practice of law in Vermont is "less a science" and more a business and practice
of Political demagoguery.
I wrote that letter to Spence when I heard he
was coming to Vermont Law school to speak at their Graduation ceremonies in
2001. As you will see in the letter I let him know "Vermont's judiciary is
nothing to be proud of." His response and speech indicated he agreed (get a
local lawyer, soon!!!) He missed a good opportunity to challenge some Bar
brain who spoke before him brainwashing the new recruits with admonishments of
"overlooking judges' and jurors' bias, you'll have that occasionally." They all
turn a blind eye to the excesses of their brethren at the BAR (how many corrupt,
perjuring, embezzling, conniving judges or lawyers have you heard of going to
jail in this land of "equal justice under the law"?), to maintain their self-
serving bench-made power structure (professional courtesy you know).
Spence did thunder out a few good thought
provokers though. He pointed
out "the law can be a bully!,..., if you are
going to work for the dead-government or Corporations, I don't want anything to
do with you,..., if you are for people, I am there,... what is justice, well
that might be difficult to explain,..., what is injustice, that is easier to
identify, your forefathers knew what injustices were, they FOUGHT WARS over
One of the BAR association talking points is that we are
anarchists for challenging the inequities of the "status quo." I would
counter that they are the anarchists for not abiding by the "Supreme law of the
Land-- the U.S. Constitution" .....
Advocating for legislation as proposed by www.jail4judges.org is the reasonable
alternative to what is brewing all across the nation as evidenced by the many
"property, children, family, ..., rights" groups and Marches forming in direct
response to "judicial tyranny." The big question is, will the powers-
that-be learn from the lessons in history and what an attitude of indifference
and "let them eat cake" results in? Or, will the "reasonable man standard"
prevail and open-public debate be allowed to better insure the
welfare, common defense, domestic tranquility, the Supreme Law of
the Land - the U.S. Constitution."
J.A.I.L. is an acronym for
Judicial Accountability Initiative Law
JAIL's very informative website is
found at www.jail4judges.org
proposes a unique new addition to our form of government.
JAIL is powerful!
JAIL is dynamic! JAIL is America's ONLY hope!
JAIL is spreading across
America like a fast moving wildfire!
JAIL is making inroads into Congress for
JAIL may be supported at P.O. Box 207, N. Hollywood,
To subscribe or be removed: add-remove-jail@...
E-Groups sign on at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jail4judges/join
Open forum to make your voice heard JAIL-SoundOff@egroups.com
what J.A.I.L. can do for me, but ask what I can do for
"..it does not require a majority
to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in
people's minds.." - Samuel Adams
"There are a thousand hacking at
the branches of evil to one who is
striking at the
-- Henry David Thoreau <><