Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

* The judges did wrong, but they don't feel the pain.

Expand Messages
  • jail4judges
    J.A.I.L. News Journal ____________________________________________________ Los Angeles, California May 17, 2002 For a
    Message 1 of 1 , May 17, 2002
      J.A.I.L. News Journal
      Los Angeles, California                                           May 17, 2002
      For a beautiful navy blue T-shirt with "J.A.I.L." on the back and www.jail4judges.org large and visible over the pocket, imprinted in a bright yellow-gold lettering, send your check payable to J.A.I.L. for $11.95 plus $4 S&H. (Discounts on volume quantities.) Wear them to your next courthouse function and watch the reaction.
       The judges did wrong, but they don't feel the pain. 
      Again, judges are not held accountable for their actions.



      Wichita Settles Lawsuit Vs. Judges

      WICHITA, Kan. (AP) - Plaintiffs who sued after being jailed for failure to pay traffic and misdemeanor court fines have won a $2.7 million settlement from the city of Wichita.

      The class-action lawsuit, filed on behalf of more than 7,000 people, challenged the constitutionality of the Municipal Court's so-called time to pay docket: The system called people with outstanding fines and court costs before a judge and ordered them to pay or be jailed.

      The city agreed Tuesday to an out-of-court settlement under which the plaintiffs will get at least $115 each, in addition to a cash payment depending on how long each was jailed, the city said. Their attorneys will collect at least $1 million. In addition, the city agreed to forgive court debts owed by the plaintiffs totaling more than $3.5 million.

      In agreeing to the deal, the city admitted no wrongdoing. It said it settled the case to save taxpayers the cost of a lengthy trial.

      Lawyers for the former inmates said 7,351 people were locked up for a total of 148,537 days over a three-year period on the "time to pay" docket. They contended that judges routinely jailed indigent defendants without holding hearings to determine their ability to pay.

      In June 1998, a Sedgwick County judge ordered the release of more than 70 jail inmates who owned city fines because he thought the practice was unconstitutional. The Kansas Supreme Court later ruled that the judge did not have the authority to release the inmates but did not address the practice's constitutionality.

      Copyright 2002

      Thanks to Henry Nicolle, sheriff@..., for sending J.A.I.L. this article.

      J.A.I.L. is an acronym for Judicial Accountability Initiative Law
      JAIL's very informative website is found at www.jail4judges.org
      JAIL proposes a unique new addition to our form of government.
      JAIL is powerful! JAIL is dynamic! JAIL is America's ONLY hope!
      JAIL is spreading across America like a fast moving wildfire!
      JAIL is making inroads into Congress for federal accountability!
      JAIL may be supported at P.O. Box 207, N. Hollywood, CA 91603
      To subscribe or be removed:  add-remove-jail@...
      E-Groups may sign on at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jail4judges/join
      Open forum to make your voice heard JAIL-SoundOff@egroups.com
      Ask not what J.A.I.L. can do for me, but ask what I can do for J.A.I.L.
      "..it does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds.." - Samuel Adams
      "There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one who is
      striking at the root."                         -- Henry David Thoreau    <><
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.