It's Our Duty to Put
Government Out Of "Business"
I think I have valid thoughts
as to how we have given up our rights (yes, I blame us as no government can
harm us unless we allow them to circumvent our natural
... this means little when
some law enforcer of statutory law is holding a gun to your head, so to
speak. That is what must be changed.
representation serves only itself and the governments, not the people, so it
is and has always been up to us to right the wrongs.
Below are two excellent expositions of the
problem. What must be examined, however, is the
solution proposed. If a "full disclosure statement"
requirement is established, as described below, by what authority will it
be enforced? Where does one take the matter if the "FDS" requirement is
disregarded or disobeyed? --to a government agency in the current law
enforcement system? --to a commission or committee in the current justice
system? --to a court in the current judicial system? Or to ANY agency or
department within the current government system?
I believe the writers below agree that our
current government system is corrupt. If it is corrupt, the question must be
asked: Why would we consider establishing a program or procedure that would be
enforceable within the corrupt system? What would the People gain by
looking to government officials of a corrupt system that does NOT protect
our rights? Do not the facts of the problem described below show that the
current system, under the guise of government, is indeed the ENEMY of the
EVERY FACET of the problem will be resolved by a
simple solution: Hold judges accountable to the People according to
the limitations established by the U.S. Constitution.
It is the DUTY of the People to see to it that our
rights are secured and protected by our constitutional government-- and unless
we have a constitutional government, our rights will NOT be protected.
Anything less than a constitutional government will not do. We sure don't
have one now!
J.A.I.L. will fulfill that requirement. There is a
lot of talk about "security" especially since 9-11. Instead of surrounding our
buildings and airports with "security guards" employed by the corrupt powers
that be, we must establish a "security guard" of the People surrounding
government which focuses on the ultimate decisionmaker-- the judiciary.
That "security guard" designed to protect the People from our domestic enemy
is called J.A.I.L. Before our rights --all of them-- can be secured, we
must have J.A.I.L. in place, as a "watchdog," just in case it's needed to keep
our government within its lawful function.
Ron Loeber, Lt.JAILer-In-Chief of New York J.A.I.L.
"We only need one good watch dog, and I have mine. His name is
J.A.I.L. He is still a puppy, but he is growing and learning and
developing. And like all puppies, he loves to learn. I'm feeding
him and training him and loving him. He is already waiting to sink his
teeth into someone. And when he becomes mature, he is going to be the
nastiest Junk Yard Dog you ever saw. Everyone will think more than twice
before they trespass upon my junk yard 'cause they know I will turn J.A.I.L.
loose upon them in a heartbeat. Shucks Bob, my 'friendly legislators'
already know about my puppy and he scares the hell out of them. They are
afraid J.A.I.L. will bite them."
Our thanks to Ed Lewis and Nancy Heiser for the
information they provided below.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, May 11, 2002 2:18
Subject: It's a business!
The Police State We Live In
If it isn't martial law, then what is?
by Ed Lewis
Thank you for your worthwhile
(above-mentioned) article someone e-mailed me recently! Please
allow me to answer your question (as we observe the same problems on the
In my humble opinion.....it's
very simple.....it has become a dangerously big, big, (just may be one of the
enterprise'....to the various state & federal bar associations
& it's memberships....an exclusive enterprise....nothing
more and nothing less. We see this over and over again everywhere.
When you go
into their courtrooms...the judge is a bar member, the
public defender(pretender) is a bar member, and, the prosecutor is a bar
member....all of an exclusive club that you or I can't belong to....but yet
they make laws affecting all of our lives exclusively in one way or another
from cradle to grave....and, you know what...they know it too!
The $$$$ money to
be made in this very huge industry where law (as we thought we knew
it) no longer exists in any of our beloved states. The 'bar
associations' run everything from top to bottom.....and, by all appearances
they make up the law (called color of law which has nothing to do with each
states' respective constitutions) as they go along....they win every
time...even when they lose they win....because they send you a big
Most of the politicians from top to
bottom are lawyers.....and, as we all know...they never eat their own. I
personally have been a 'court watcher/observer' in the gallery.....99.9% in
our area is all 'plea bargain' and, you can hear the cha-ching of the cash
register all day long whether you are guilty or not....it doesn't matter...you
know your attorney's bill is growing....you cut your best deal! It's
absolute madness....and, I predict that eventually when the people will not be
able to pay anymore.....the house of cards that the 'bar association members'
have built and structured for their own selfishness will come tumbling
down......maybe sooner than we think.
The people are so strapped with
rules and regulations upon rules and regulations $$$, laws upon laws$$$, fees
and licenses upon fees and licenses$$$, that they never even voted on. Every
legislative session (state & federal) produces tons of new legislation
(laws) without the vote of the people that I think (in all honesty) is
strangling our beloved country to death.
Perhaps a movement should start to
grow across our great land....and that being signed 'full disclosure
statements' by the public defender (pretender), prosecutor, and judge
(before you enter thru the 'swinging bar door' of their courtrooms)
that they all belong to the same various bar associations, and, that their
first allegiance is to that bar association, AND, it's membership (look at
their charter in your own states' bar association), and, that your
best interests come in second. I believe that would be fair and square
don't you? At least the average ordinary person would know right...kinda
like leveling the playing field?! Right now as we all know....they
don't. I didn't fully realize the extent until I started 'waking up'
from my sheeple state.
I believe this full
disclosure statement has merit....what say you??
In God We Trust,
Nancy Heiser, copyright
during the fall in, 2002.
------ Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, May 11, 2002 9:54 AM
Subject: Re: It's a business!
I agree on a full disclosure statement.
And I do mean "full". My studies continue of the type of courts we are
subjected to and they are not courts of common law. Each and every one
is unconstitutional as they are courts of equity, neither of which has
jurisdiction over the sovereign man or woman with natural rights. In
fact, no natural person can be tried in courts of equity (or merchant law in
which the government applies political power) without his express
permission. Of course, this means little when some law enforcer of
statutory law is holding a gun to your head, so to speak. That is what
must be changed.
Thus, full disclosure dictates that the
natural person entering the court be informed he is not under the law
of the Constitution and that he has no rights, that the judge
sits as the judge and jury.
He or she must be informed that he is being
prosecuted by an agent of the State with allegiance to statutory law, not to
the common law of the freeman. He must be
informed that the fact is, the statute(s) being applied against him are
jurisdictionally applied to franchised artificial persons, including those in
government and franchises (corporations) created and privileged by the
Furthermore, juries should be present in
every case. Missouri statute even dictates this unless the defendant
waives the right. The problem is which hundreds of laws, the defendant
seldom knows there is a time factor, that if he doesn't demand a jury at least
5 days prior to court, that he automatically waives his right. Thus, the
silence of the government constitutes fraud (See U.S. v. Tweel, 550 F2d 297,
The defendant must be informed of his right to
a jury and the jury informed that they will respond only based on the common
law of the Constitution. This means they must have the right to face
their accuser and, for example, a law enforcer writing a ticket is not an
"accuser". The state or level of government he works for is but no
government has rights to be violated unless the sovereign has a contract with
the state (franchised, for example) placing himself under the de facto laws
of the artificial persons. No victim and therefore, no crime
committed. Thus, the jury must be fully informed as to jury
I could go on but hopefully we are in
agreement. And I fully support a nationwide movement to destroy courts
of equity applied to we sovereign.
I would go a step further with Bar
attorneys. I believe they should be prohibited from setting foot in a
common law court of the people (only non-Bar lawyers could or any other
natural person giving "counsel" with or without pay; that should be prohibited
from holding office; that they should be prohibited from being judges; in
short, that they should lose their citizenship as their allegiance is not to
the Constitution for the uniting of the States which gives express
jurisdiction that is not over the sovereign people. No state has equity
jurisdiction over the sovereign and people must be made aware of
To continue, Bar allegiance is to the Bar as
you know, and all are associated with the International Bar Association (IBA)
of London, England. I therefore believe that the original 13th Amendment
should be fully in force, that by giving allegiance to the Bar, citizenship as
a constitutional natural person is forfeited.
This is actually factual in regards to
becoming a member of the corporate government (an artificial person).
All who subscribe to an oath of office in performing the duties of the office
forfeit their constitutionally secured rights and place themselves under
statutory law meant to regulate artificial persons. In their private lives, the common law of the
Constitution still applies.
Well, Nancy, I could keep writing about this
for hours. My current project is
writing a complete explanation of the unlawfulness of property tax placed on
other than franchised property. This when done will be easily
converted to affidavits of truth which must stand above and beyond courts of
equity and merchant law as natural rights stand above "privilege", the
dictates of the elected few (equity or merchant), and even the so-called
vote of the majority as rights are individual rights, not privileges
determined by the majority.
BTW, I agree it is a business and during my
battles against local government, the many crimes (true crimes in which
the natural man or woman is the victim) include theft, extortion, mail fraud,
misrepresentation, and so on that is clearly defined under RICO as
racketeering. Thus, it is a business relying on deceit and
non-disclosure of facts in law (law should refer only to common
misunderstand. I am not pushing myself on others - I don't get paid for
writing although many sites use my material. But, I think I have valid
thoughts as to how we have given up our rights (yes, I blame us as no
government can harm us unless we allow them to circumvent our
natural rights). Also, if we controlled locally, we would control
nationally as a union of States, the people not the State government that we
created to defend constitutionally secured rights.
But, if you want to read other
stuff and agree or disagree. We must never allow disagreements to thwart
open discussion, the basis that every party except the Demo-krauts and
Republi-krauts has failed. The two major parties always end up doing
what is good for the party which is to say, good for the
members holding office.
Keep And Bear Arms used to
archive every article but since "Silent Conquest" have not done so since the
site is over-loaded and short on personnel. But, one that uses every
article no matter what I write is World Newsstand at: http://www.worldnewsstand.net/2001/article/EdLewis.htm
I believe a nationwide movement
is an absolute must. That is one reason I spend the time and effort to
write the booklet I am putting together. But, even when in sales
and teaching sales, I always tried what I taught and the same holds
true. I must rid myself of tax on my property through lawful means
(meaning not shooting the bastards extorting my property from me). This
is priority now because I refuse to pay again and I must head off a seizure
that would get me into their courts.
It must be an organization that
will say it like it is, even if it means doing so at great personal
risk. And, when dealing with any level of government and confronting it
with its crimes against the people, there will be personal risk. They
will not give up the gravy train without a fight. And, as it currently
is, they hold a fully loaded gun while we only have pea shooters.
Well, I told you I could keep
writing. But, for certain, stay in communication with me. As I
said, I like your idea. It is an ideal that can be developed along with
organizations striving for judicial accountability. Our elected
representation serves only itself and the governments, not the people, so it
is and has always been up to us to right the wrongs.
J.A.I.L. is an acronym for Judicial
Accountability Initiative Law
JAIL's very informative website is found at
proposes a unique new addition to our form of government.
powerful! JAIL is dynamic! JAIL is America's ONLY hope!
JAIL is spreading
across America like a fast moving wildfire!
JAIL is making inroads into
Congress for federal accountability!
JAIL may be supported at P.O. Box
207, N. Hollywood, CA 91603
To subscribe or be removed: add-remove-jail@...
E-Groups may sign on at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jail4judges/join
Open forum to make your voice heard JAIL-SoundOff@egroups.com
not what J.A.I.L. can do for me, but ask what I can do for
"..it does not require a majority to
prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in
people's minds.." - Samuel Adams
"There are a thousand hacking at the
branches of evil to one who is
striking at the
-- Henry David Thoreau