Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

J.A.I.L. is the Only answer for Canada too!

Expand Messages
  • jail4judges
    Clear DayJ.A.I.L. is the Only answer for Canada too! Dear Jim Townsend: townsendjim@hotmail.com I have just read the entire reverse string below, and in
    Message 1 of 1 , Jan 16, 2002
      Clear Day
      J.A.I.L. is the Only answer
      for Canada too!
      Dear Jim Townsend:
      I have just read the entire reverse string below, and in response to your asking me for what I think, it is as follows:
      The approach taken by J.A.I.L. is that we are designed to force the judges on the hotseat of personal liability as they try defending themselves before a citizens Grand Jury wherein they argue admiralty law, bankruptcy, etc, as the reason for not upholding their oaths of office to defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic.
      By judges so arguing these defenses, they will have to admit that they did violated the Constitution, and that they did it willfully, qualifying them for civil liability. Furthermore, they also subject themselves to be thrown in prison for years on perjury charges.
      Such arguments will open the eyes of the public greatly, as these judges' arguments become public record, and judge after judge goes to prison. J.A.I.L. will turn the entire system upside down, or so it will appear, inasmuch as it is now entirely upside down, to wit, "Injustice" equals "Justice."
      We need to give up excuses for the judges doing what they do, and make them answer to us! Nothing is availed by our dancing to their tune. Let's make them dance to ours - willful violations of the Constitution!
      The fact is, J.A.I.L. is the only answer for Canada too!

      ----- Original Message -----
      Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 9:10 PM
      Subject: Re: J.A.I.L. for Judges!!!

      Fair enough, if that is your opinion, but do me a favor and read these. Please tell me what you think of them Barbie.
      Cheers, Jim
       ----- Original Message -----
      Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 8:48 PM
      Subject: Re: J.A.I.L. for Judges!!!

      Dear Jim:
      The focus of J.A.I.L. is the judiciary-- not the lawyers or Bar. And in fact, we find that the judiciary is the ROOT of the problem-- not a branch. The judiciary is the final backstop of all matters. They have the final say on anything brought for redress of grievances. The problem is that we don't get redress in our courts because of corrupt judges who are not accountable for their actions. The judges disregard their duty. Regardless of how corrupt the lawyers are, the judiciary has the responsibility of putting that corruption to an end as a matter of law. However, with a corrupt judiciary, that can't be done, as they are part of the problem and not the solution.
      It is our judiciary that sits in judgment over any grievance, including corrupt lawyers or the corrupt Bar Association, brought to court for redress. Therefore, it's the judiciary that must be held accountable to the People, which is what the J.A.I.L. process will provide. I believe what you are asking for is beyond the scope of J.A.I.L.
      I have forwarded this to Ron's computer for his information. Thank you for writing.

      ----- Original Message -----
      Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 9:12 AM
      Subject: J.A.I.L. for Judges!!!

      Hello Ron,
      I do not know who John is. I understand that you are working to remove the unlawful privately owned British Accreditation Regency 'legal system' from the law courts of your country. The same people that have enslaved you enslave us as well, the major difference being that, unlike you, we never have been a free people. At least you people had about three weeks of real freedom in your history, before the legal system got you back into the trap.
      Though I admire the approach you take, it is not practical here in Canada as our entire government is far too corrupt. What we are concentrating on is preparing cases to bring the Inns of Temple Court, the private clubs that own the 'legal system franchise' that is imposed on us, to the LAW COURTS at Westminster, where they are at their absolute peril. In the 'legal gaming courts' here in Canada, all we can do is play the part of the fish while the Justice Department, which owns Revenue Canada, play at shooting fish in a barrel. It does not matter what the case is in Canada, the only sure winner is the court system that collect fees from both parties. I have Hansard notes from the House of Lords dating back to when Canada was 'patriating' it's Constitution in 1982, where they are laughing at our gullibility, but conceding that the reason we are so stupid is because our fathers were also deceived before us and as a consequence have no idea what the true nature of the deceit is.
      Since this unlawful 'legal system' has been imposed in all countries that are "Constitutional Monarchies" (a serious contradiction of terms) we are trying to motivate people in Scotland, Ireland, South Africa, Australia and New Zealand to do the same. It would be wonderful if a group of Americans would also launch a class action suit against the people in Britain that own this private legal system franchise, in their own Law Courts, that have imposed this deception in our various countries. They are guilty of crimes against humanity and need to be brought to Justice.
      'Legal' and 'Lawful' are two different things. In the distinction between the two, lie the basis of this great deceit. I no longer look for definitions of anything anywhere except in Black's Law Dictionary. Please check my definitions for yourself. Lawful contemplates the spirit of the law. It is the substance of our law system. It is predicated upon the morals and ethics of the state (the people) who live in a given geographical area. Legal simply means it is written down someplace. 'Legal' means the letter of the Law. It is quite possible for something to be 'legal' and totally UNLAWFUL. All of our law courts in North America have been overthrown and replaced with a legal court system. Lawyers are all members of the 'British Accreditation Regency'. In other words, they have sworn allegiance to a foreign power. This is why lawyers only ever talk about what is legal and not what is lawful.
      Lawyers are given the British Title of 'Esquire'. An squire is a shield bearer. British Titles are given out for service to the British Crown. (The British Crown by the way, is not the Monarch, but a legislative body of bankers and lawyers from Fleet Street where these Inns of Temple Court exist.) Ever wonder what service G.H.W. Bush or Mayor Giuliani rendered to the British Crown to become Knights of the British Empire? Do you know how many people holding top positions in your own government are Knights of the British Empire? Does it not bother you people that those you have elected to authority in your country have sworn allegiance to a foreign power? Isn't that treason? It is time we ripped the disgusting rag from the eyes of Justice so she can see to wield her divine sword of Justice against these criminals.
      I really like the fact that you people are working so hard to exacerbate the plans of these global dominators, but it would sure be nice if you were chopping at the roots of the problem rather than just trimming all the branches. If you are interested in what it is that I am saying, I can send you copies of my book; "Freedom! Canada" and a number of brochures, which explains much of how the British have deceived us here in Canada. I do not have my book online anymore as, once again, my web site has been closed. I keep losing service providers for "spamming", even though all I do is send political messages to elected officials and government employees.
      Wishing you all the best, my American cousins. Keep your chins up and fight the good fight. I have some links at that you may be interested in as well. Since I have had numerous hotmail email accounts closed as well, my number is 403-228-2798. Please contact me there if my I lose my ISP connection again or if they close this hotmail account.
      Cheers, Jim
      P.S. Do you know what the lawful definition of Free is? Look in Black's Law Dictionary...
      Free: Not subject to the legal constraints of another. (Isn't that interesting.)
      Other definitions you should look at; State (the people in a given geographical area. We the people, are the state, not the government.) License (a permit to do something that would otherwise be illegal. It is illegal for you to own your own car or to drive it on the highway without getting a license from the British Crown?) Constitution (the body of law, written by the people, for regulating the government. So why are our governments playing with our Constitutions? Why are the foxes writing the rules for the hen house?)
      Free people are self governing. We do not elect governments to govern us. We elect governments to govern the civil service. Perhaps if we made our politicians wear janitor uniforms, they would understand their place in society and would understand that we are electing EMPLOYEES, NOT LEADERS. More likely though, they already understand this and it is WE THE PEOPLE that need to come to this realization.
      "The nation that wishes to remain IGNORANT and FREE, wishes for what never was, and never will be."
      Thomas Jefferson

      Jim Townsend
      Custom Visual Basic Programming

      Dear Jim Townsend:
      Barb tells me that she has placed you in touch with John there in Canada, and has added you to her computer. I have now added you to my computer as well, so you are now an official Canada JAILer.
      One of the projects setting on the stove is coming up with a written proposed initiative or legislation for Canada. I don't know if Canada has an initiative process, but in any case, we need to compile a proposal.
      Please get together with John and design a proposal that is near consistent with the California Initiative, yet practical to Canada. Attached is a copy of the California Initiative for you two to work with. After you come up with your draft, please contact me with it. Thanks. I will be looking forward to seeing what you come up with.

      ----- Original Message -----
      From: DataMorf
      Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2001 6:51 AM
      Subject: Email Addresses

      Do you have a chapter in Canada?
      I like what you write.
      I have an email list of some 50,000 politicians and government employees in Canada, mostly from the Justice Department.
      You are quite welcome to them if you wish to send this information to them as well.
      It might help a bit having outside legal forces looking in.
      Keep up the great work!
      Cheers, Jim

      Jim Townsend
      Custom Visual Basic Programming
      (403) 228 - 2798

    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.