** Judicial Anarchy - Part I
J.A.I.L. News Journal
Los Angeles - February 26, 2001
Listen to HotSeat4Judges daily on Internet Radio M-Th, 6-7 pm P.T.
For a beautiful navy blue T-shirt with "J.A.I.L." on the back and www.jail4judges.org large and visible over the pocket, imprinted in a bright yellow-gold lettering, send your check payable to J.A.I.L. for $11.95 plus $4 S&H. (Discounts on volume quantities.) Wear them to your next courthouse function and watch the reaction.J.A.I.L. needs second computer: Due to JAIL's growing success, we have found the definite need for a second computer to handle the volume of emails JAIL is receiving. If you are receiving a blessing from the emails sent by JAIL, and believe this to be a worthy cause for your financial support, it would help make a second computer a reality. This computer will cost approximately $1000 to 1200. Thanks for your support.
Judicial Anarchy Part I was published in the Idaho Observer in the December 2000 issue. The January 2001 issue included part II in the center section, which featured a number of judicial corruption articles. You may see them by visiting our website at www.proliberty.com/observer- Hari HeathJudicial Anarchy - Part Iby Hari Heath
As Thomas Jefferson said to Spencer Roane, in 1821, "The great object of my fear is the Federal Judiciary. That body, like gravity, ever acting with
noiseless foot and unalarming advance, gaining ground step by step and
holding what it gains, is engulfing insidiously the special governments into
the jaws of that which feeds them."Colonel Dan said more recently in his article, The Swords of American
Patriots (http://www.sierratimes.com/archive/dan/edcd112400.htm) "When those that are solemnly charged with upholding the law ignore the law; then there is no law; there is only lawlessness."Today, we find ourselves and our nation in a state of judicial anarchy.
Originally entrusted to interpret our laws and maintain access to courts of
justice, the judiciary has evolved into a creature of not so subtle
lawlessness. It has not been a sudden event. Slowly, step by step, we have
been conditioned to the changes made by the judicial governing power. What would have been an outrage a century ago, like taking children away from their parents and giving them to the custody of a government agency, or seizing someone's home and property because of a weed found growing there, or compelling the use of seat belts in your own private carriage, has now become the norm. The seeds of judicial anarchy were sown long ago and have prospered by our failure to weed the garden of government:"At the establishment of our Constitutions, the judiciary bodies were
supposed to be the most helpless and harmless members of the government. Experience, however, soon showed in what way they were to become the most dangerous; that the insufficiency of the means provided for their removal gave them a freehold and irresponsibility in office; that their decisions, seeming to concern individual suitors only, pass silent and unheeded by the public at large; that these decisions nevertheless become law by precedent, sapping by little and little the foundations of the Constitution and working its change by construction before any one has perceived that that invisible and helpless worm has been busily employed in consuming its substance. In truth, man is not made to be trusted for life if secured against all liability to account." --Thomas Jefferson to A. Coray, 1823.Years ago, public service was just that. Now the relationship between
master and servant has been reversed and we the people serve our new masters with taxes and tribute. "All rise," as "your Honor" proceeds to the bench for another session of pillage and plunder. Caught in the web of pretended offenses where, all too often, no one but the "defendant" has been offended, the judicial officer lays a claim of jurisdiction to determine who gets what's left of our lives and fortunes.Constitutional provisions securing our rights be damned or ignored by the judicial hordes, we are treated by the judiciary as mere property, whose rights exist only by the permission of government, subject to judicial discretion. Time after time, Americans who still believe they have rights antecedent to government have challenged the tyrannical corruption of the third branch only to find themselves beaten down by a judicial officer, who willingly departs from the government laid down by the Constitution and embraces a new regime.How has this happened? Once a third component of the fabric of our
Republic, the judiciary has now evolved to become legislators and
administrators who have isolated themselves from the other branches of
government and granted themselves immunity with impunity.In decision after decision, the judiciary has written not just volumes, but
libraries, full of doctrines to command every aspect of our lives and their
own protection. With their doctrines and rules, they have established law
after law, with no need for a legislature.Thomas Jefferson explained it well in 1807: "The original error [was in]
establishing a judiciary independent of the nation, and which, from the
citadel of the law, can turn its guns on those they were meant to defend, and control and fashion their proceedings to its own will."The Constitutions command that the lesser courts be established by the
legislatures or the Congress, thus keeping a check and balance between the
powers of the three branches of government. Article I, Section 8, clause 9
of the federal Constitution grants Congress the power to "constitute
tribunals inferior to the Supreme Court" and Article 3, Section 1 vests the
judicial power "in one Supreme Court, and in such inferior courts as the
congress may from time to time ordain and establish."No longer ordained and established by the Congress, our lower courts have become the province of the Supreme Courts. With this in house control, the judiciary administers these courts through "rules" recommended by committees of lawyers and "adopted" by the state and federal Supreme Courts.
"The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive and judiciary, in
the same hands, whether on one, a few or many and whether hereditary, self appointed or elective, may justly be pronounced the very definition of
tyranny." -- James Madison, The Federalist Papers, No. 47. And in whose hands does this accumulation of power reside? That greatest of all monopolies, the Bar Associations, claim as their members, all judges, all
attorneys, many legislators, much of the executive branch members, and a
small army of attorneys who have infiltrated the administrative agencies
which have become a branch of government unto themselves. The iron grip of the Bar Associations are maintained by prosecuting all who would act
independent of their association.By managing the monopoly of the Bar Associations, they control the
attorney's who bring the cases and questions before them. By creating the
rules of court they control the proceedings before them. By controlling the
evidence and the testimony they control the facts. With a broad and
unfettered "discretion" they determine just what the law is. By controlling
the jury they control the verdict. By controlling the question and the
questioners, they control the answer.And in the wake of this judicial tyranny imposed by the black robes behind
the bench, gathering power unto themselves, we now face the prospect of a judicial act which will determine the next President.
Obstruction of Justice?
Law should be a simple thing designed first and foremost for the people
themselves. It could and should be a system that is comprehensible and usable by the average person. Law should be clear and predictable, something one can rely on.As it is now, the system is so complex and contradictory, that many
lawyers, even after years of training in the system, still have difficulty
navigating through the courts to a successful outcome. Instead of simple
justice we have a convoluted and contradictory system designed for perpetual litigation (make work for attorneys) and an obstruction of true justice. Courts cannot be predicted, even on seemingly clear issues, because the layers of contradictory case law laid down for decades give ripe opportunity for the whimsical discretion of the presiding judge. One rule or statute may command certain conduct, while another commands a contradictory result. Fill a law library with enough rules and statutes and the judiciary is unfettered in their ability to pick and chose the outcome of any given matter. Justice can be obstructed, truth can be ignored and the Constitution shunned. After all, when the system fails you, to whom are you going to apply for a remedy? In the last ten years, how many people have filed law suits against government officials to enforce the violation of their constitutional rights?I have filed several and personally know of thousands more. How many have succeeded? Almost none. Yes, Rodney King won his, mostly through the illumination of media attention, but most fail to pass the initial Motion to Dismiss for "failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted", or
run into the wall of immunity-- judicially created immunity. Such immunity
exists only because of case law or "judicial legislation" which claims that
such immunity exists. Can such immunity from damage suits be anything other than the obstruction of justice when judges and prosecutors willingly and intentionally violate the Constitution and laws depriving us of our
constitutionally secured rights?Constitutionally, judges can't legislate and no act of Congress has granted
them any immunity. It's nothing more than one of the feathers in their
judicial cap. That cap however is the hat of judicial anarchy which is
bleeding away what's left of our nation and our lives, fortunes, and sacred
honor like so much sap in a tree. Next month we'll expose how we have been milked and mined into this state of judicial anarchy, as Thomas Jefferson so aptly explains:
"The judiciary of the United States is the subtle corps of sappers and
miners constantly working under ground to undermine the foundations of our confederated fabric. They are construing our Constitution from a
Co-ordination of a general and special government to a general and supreme one alone. This will lay all things at their feet, and they are too well versed in English law to forget the maxim, 'boni judicis est ampliare
jurisdictionem.' [good judges have ample jurisdiction]"--Thomas Jefferson to Thomas Riche, 1820.Our deepest thanks to Hari Heath, a reporter, and an Idaho JAILer.
J.A.I.L. is an acronym for (Judicial Accountability Initiative Law)
JAIL's very informative website is found at www.jail4judges.org
JAIL proposes a unique new addition to our form of government.
JAIL is powerful! JAIL is dynamic! JAIL is America's ONLY hope!
JAIL's is spreading across America like a fast moving wildfire!
JAIL is making inroads into Congress for federal accountability!
JAIL may be supported at P.O. Box 207, N. Hollywood, CA 91603
To subscribe or be removed: add-remove-jail@...
E-Groups may sign on at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jail4judges/join
Open forum to make your voice heard JAIL-SoundOff@egroups.com"..it does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds.." - Samuel Adams"There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one who is
striking at the root." -- Henry David Thoreau <><