Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Drugs Profitable To Government

Expand Messages
  • jail4judges
    State: Drug taxes due, despite lack of charges By The Associated Press
    Message 1 of 1 , Jun 14, 2000

      State: Drug taxes due, despite lack of charges
      By The Associated Press
          Charles Thomas Jr. doesn't own any land near his trailer, where police seized more than 500 marijuana plants last year.
      Thomas says he didn't plant them. And, after being questioned by police, he was never charged with a crime.
          A local grand jury declined to indict Thomas. But the state nonetheless is demanding that he pay $1,161,859.94 in taxes, penalties and interest on the marijuana under a 1994 law that allows such an assessment based only on a police officer's report.
          The Marijuana and Controlled Substances Tax law says that anyone who possesses enough illegal drugs to be considered a drug dealer must pay taxes on them. Lawmakers hoped the measure would recover some of the profits of the illegal drug trade and get tough on drug dealers.

           The law

          Anyone with more than five marijuana plants is considered a dealer and must pay $1,000 per plant. A person with at least 42.5 grams of marijuana must pay $3.50 per gram. In cases where a dealer is also convicted of a crime, it serves - in effect - to levy a substantial additional fine.
          But even when the standard of proof in criminal court cannot be met  - as in Thomas' case - the law can still punish those identified by police as drug dealers.
          "I don't know what I'm going to do," said Thomas, 26, a college dropout from Breathitt County. "I could never pay this off."
          Relying on a police report that listed him as the "dealer"
      > responsible for the plants, the
      Kentucky Revenue Cabinet has ordered Thomas to pay the tax on them. And just to appeal the tax bill, Thomas must first post bond in the amount of the tax that the state says he owes, which Thomas said is impossible.
          "It's about drove me crazy," he said as he stood in front of his trailer home and surveyed the hollow where police seized the marijuana plants. "I don't own any of this. I don't control any of it."

           Legal wrangling

          Despite the popularity of anti-drug bills with members of the
      Kentucky General Assembly, the 1994 bill had its opponents - including respected attorneys in both political parties.
          Former Sen. Walter Baker, a Glasgow Republican who later briefly served on the Kentucky Supreme Court, believed the law was flawed and voted against it. "If you violate the law you ought to be prosecuted," Baker said. "But with this law it seems the state is loading up in what is an unfair and, in my judgment, an unconstitutional way."


          Thomas' troubles began last September when the Kentucky State Police's Marijuana Strike Force first spotted the plants from a helicopter along Cloverfork Road in western Breathitt County. State police files indicate investigators found marijuana plants in two large patches and in three smaller ones. Thomas said that as investigators were cutting down the plants, police stopped him for questioning as he was driving on the gravel road from his trailer. According to police records, Thomas said he told police that he had nothing to do with the plants, an assertion he has repeated. At the time the plants were found, Thomas said, he was living mostly at college in Morehead.
          State police records show the investigation was closed Jan. 26. But under the 1994 law, the trooper who conducted the investigation sent a "Notice of Seizure and Tax Lien" to the revenue cabinet, listing Thomas as the "dealer" of the seized marijuana plants.
          The law sets a tax of $1,000 per plant plus a $1,000 penalty per plant. The tax and penalty, plus $4,078.38 in interest put Thomas' original bill at $1,038,078.38. Interest and fees have increased the bill - which is still growing - to $1,161,859.94.

           A challenge

          In 1995 two Lexington men challenged the tax law, saying it violated their rights against double jeopardy. After winning in Fayette Circuit Court and in the Kentucky Court of Appeals, the state Supreme Court in November 1998 unanimously ruled against their double-jeopardy claim, saying the tax does not
      constitute double jeopardy, partly because "assessment and payment of the drug tax is not contingent on the commission of a crime. The tax is levied regardless of whether the taxpayer has been arrested."
          Thomas' lawyer, Robert Cornett, is exploring options to fight
      Thomas' tax bill. "It's very distressing," Cornett said. "The state apparently lacks evidence needed to bring charges, but on the word of one police officer it can levy this tax that puts Charles' life on hold."
          The revenue cabinet has filed a lien against Thomas in the Breathitt County Clerk's office and has written letters to the two banks in the county to seize any of his accounts. Thomas had no accounts at either bank. He works for his mother's consignment clothing store and for other family-owned businesses and is paid in cash, but he's reluctant to apply for another job because the revenue cabinet has warned it might
      attach his wages.
          Charles Werder, a supervisor in the revenue cabinet's Division of Collections, said tax bills under the law are sent when a law-enforcement officer submits a report identifying a "dealer" of seized drugs.
          "The only information we get is from the arresting officer. That's what we use," said Werder. "We don't really have much option."
          "It's not a very taxpayer-friendly-type law," Werder added. "It pretty much tells you that it's up to the person to prove that they're innocent, which kind of contradicts everything we've been brought up to believe."
      From: M.O.M. nox2128@...
      To: m.o.m. email alert list mom-l@...
      Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2000 4:44 PM
      This Evansville Courier & Press (http://www.courierpress.com/) story has been sent to you from zorrostokes@...

      Militia of Montana
      P.O. Box 1486, Noxon, MT  59853
      Tel: 406-847-2735    n Fax: 406-847-2246

      Note:   In law, what do we call persons who knowingly benefit from the fruits of criminal activity? Is it not "An accessory after the fact." The follow up question is, is crime not a crime if crime is committed by government?
          It was our past mayor of Los Angeles, Mayor Bradley, who said, "Drugs are helping Los Angeles." Now if government is admittedly finding drugs financially profitable to their coffers, I wonder how long it will take then in their "War on Drugs" to eradicate this from our society? Does anyone have a clue?" Is this not a "War" we will NEVER win, nor are ever intended to win? It is a pretext to set up a police state while profiting in the process. Don't look for an end to this one, folks. It just won't happen! It's too profitable.
      J.A.I.L.  (Judicial Accountability Initiative Law)
      Use header to subscribe/remove: jail4judges@...
      JAIL is a unique addition to our form of government.
      JAIL is powerful! It is dynamic! It is America's ONLY hope!
      Visit JAIL's informative websites, www.jail4judges.org (& .net)
      JAIL's message is spreading across this nation vociferously!
      Support JAIL @ P.O. Box 207, No. Hollywood, CA 91603
      "..it does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate,
      tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds.."
                                                       --Samuel Adams     
      "There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one
      who is striking at the root."   -- Henry David Thoreau    <><
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.