J.A.I.L. News Journal
Los Angeles - November
Listen to HotSeat4Judges daily on
Internet Radio M-Th, 6-7 pm
For a beautiful
navy blue T-shirt with "J.A.I.L." on the back and www.jail4judges.org large and visible over
the pocket, imprinted in a bright yellow-gold lettering, send your check payable
to J.A.I.L. for $11.95 plus $4 S&H. (Discounts on volume quantities.) Wear
them to your next courthouse function and watch the reaction.
9th Cir.- A Lying Pack
For those of your curious to know more about
Ronald Branson, his "supposed unbalanced mental state," how he constantly
agitated the judiciary, and what motivated him to write "J.A.I.L. For Judges,"
please click the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals published opinion BRANSON v. NOTT, 62 F.3d 287 (9th Cir. 1995)
link below. This was one year before the foundation of J.A.I.L. was born. This
case went on to the U.S. Supreme Ct. with the single word response,
I just happened to look this up on
"FindLaw" merely as a test of its capability. Please keep in mind that, as in
any published opinion, you see only one side of the argument - the court's. Much
turns on whether you trust the court's representation of faithfully
addressing the real issue before the court. Here, the court creates the case
they wish to tear apart, not the real issue before the
The star of their "decision" is the paragraph which
says, Notwithstanding his protestations to the
contrary, Branson's 1983 claim amounts to nothing more than an impermissible
collateral attack on prior state court decisions. See MacKay v. Pfeil, 827 F.2d 540, 543 (9th Cir. 1987) (per curiam). Branson seeks as
"prospective injunctive relief" an order requiring the state superior court
clerk to enter a default judgment against Sergeant Smith and, inconsistently, to
"immediately set the default for hearing for court judgment as requested by
plaintiff . . . ."
The phrase "impermissible
collateral attack on prior court decisions" is their favorite. I have
gone through this federal process so many times as to become a professional as
to knowing just exactly how they handle federal appeals, and I can say with
authority, that even if one were challenging the lack of a state court
decision, no decision at all, and such were indeed the truth, they still would
come back with "an impermissible collateral attack on a
prior court decision." In other words, "Forget it! We have told you time
and time again, you just absolutely are not going to receive any access to
redress of grievance no matter what."
Further, they say, Branson
seeks as "prospective injunctive relief" an order requiring the state superior
court clerk to enter a default judgment against Sergeant Smith and,
inconsistently, to "immediately set the default for hearing for court judgment
as requested by plaintiff . . . ." To make the
argument appear "inconsistent" they add the word "judgment".
The law clearly requires the clerk of the court
to enter "default" if there is no response from the defendant after the set
number of days to respond. (Clerks do not enter default judgments
where there are trialable issues as opposed to clear contractual issues
where there are no amounts in dispute). Then the plaintiff must
petition the court for a default hearing where the case goes to
"prove-up" and judgment. Now I ask you, are these judges that stupid that they
do not know this long-standing principle of law? or do they know it and just
want to make Mr. Branson appear in print to be a stupid pro se? Clearly, the
issue here is, does the law mean what it says! After the clerk enters default,
then the defendant may attack the validity of the service and seek relief from
the court, but the clerk cannot cover for an officer by refusing to enter the
judgment required to be entered under law when all the criteria have been met.
There are many other issues in this case, but I
think you have got the idea of why I believe J.A.I.L. is the only answer
for America, and that there is no hope of redress through any other means. These
judges are a pack of lying wolves seeking to undermine the entire judicial
process, and only a Citizen's Tribunal of the Special Grand Jury will hold them
J.A.I.L. is an acronym for (Judicial
Accountability Initiative Law)
JAIL's very informative website is found at www.jail4judges.org
JAIL proposes a
unique new addition to our form of government.
JAIL is powerful! JAIL is
dynamic! JAIL is America's ONLY hope!
JAIL's is spreading across America like
a fast moving wildfire!
JAIL is making inroads into Congress for federal
JAIL may be supported at P.O. Box 207, N. Hollywood, CA
To subscribe or be removed: add-remove-jail@...
To contact the author of JAIL4Judges: jail4judges@...
E-Groups are encouraged to sign on at firstname.lastname@example.org
"..it does not require a majority to
prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in
people's minds.." - Samuel Adams
"There are a thousand hacking at the
branches of evil to one who is
striking at the
-- Henry David Thoreau