Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

*** Activist Federal Judges Hit The Limelight

Expand Messages
  • jail4judges
    J.A.I.L. News Journal Los Angeles - September 18, 2000 ____________________________________________________ Listen to HotSeat4Judges daily on Internet Radio
    Message 1 of 1 , Sep 18, 2000

      J.A.I.L. News Journal
      Los Angeles - September 18, 2000
      Listen to HotSeat4Judges daily on Internet Radio M-Th, 6-7 pm P.T.
      Get a J.A.I.L. For Judges T-Shirt for your next court appearance.
      Write baronboy@... and place your order today!
      Activist Federal Judges
      Hit The Limelight
      Family Research Council (FRC) Launches Campaign To 'Bench' Judicial Activists and Initiate Reform

      Judges Are Supposed to Interpret the Constitution - Not Bend It, Twist it, or Tie it in Knots to Advance an Agenda.  The Constitution is Not Gumby,' FRC's Jan Larue Says

      WASHINGTON, Sept. 7 /PRNewswire/ -- In order to counteract the alarming trend of judicial activism, Family Research Council announced a national "Courting Justice Campaign" dedicated to judicial reform. "The federal judiciary has been increasingly courting injustice with activist decisions that distort the Constitution," said Jan LaRue, senior director of Legal Studies at the Family Research Council (FRC). "The 'Courting Justice Campaign' is a movement dedicated to establishing a judiciary that is free from the forces of power politics and personal views, and bound only by the U.S. Constitution."

      "A judicial activist is a judge who interprets the Constitution to mean what it would have said if he, instead of the Founding Fathers, had written it," said the late Sen. Sam Ervin of North Carolina.  "Judges are supposed to interpret the Constitution-not bend it, twist it, or tie it in knots to advance an agenda," said Mrs. LaRue.  "The Constitution is not Gumby."

      Partnering in the campaign are Family Research Council, Free Congress Foundation, and Eagle Forum's Court Watch. The goals and step-by-step plans of the campaign are outlined in a new publication, "Courting Justice: A Guide to Judicial Reform."  The guide describes rulings that evidence the growing trend of judicial activism, outlines the personnel and procedures of the courts that contribute to the problem, and suggests pro-active measures Americans can take to combat injustice in judging.

      The "Courting Justice" guide concludes with the proposal of a "Five for the Future Plan," which outlines the game-plan for initiating judicial
      reform in America.  The five tenets of the plan are:

      *  Block confirmation of activist/liberal judges

      * Promote U.S. senators' signing of the "Hatch Pledge" against judicial


      *  Promote state legislative passage of judicial restraint resolutions

      *  Eliminate judicial power to tax

      *  Require, as a minimum, a unanimous vote of a three-judge panel to
      invalidate citizen-passed initiatives.

      "Injustice in judging is a rampant problem in America, but it is also a resolvable problem.  In the 2000 elections, Americans can choose to elect a President and senators who will faithfully appoint judges who aren't closet legislators," Mrs. LaRue said.  The next President will likely be called on to nominate two to three justices to the Supreme Court.

      Liberal activist groups, including Planned Parenthood and the National
      Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League, have also singled out Supreme Court appointments as a priority issue at stake in the November presidential elections, coining "Nine for the Future" and "It's the Supreme Court, Stupid," as slogans for the fall.

      "With pro-abortion and other liberal groups advocating greater judicial
      activism to create more 'rights' never conceived by our Founders, the
      stakes are even higher in a campaign for judicial reform," Mrs. LaRue said.

      The authors of "Courting Justice," and co-directors of the campaign are Family Research Council's Jan LaRue, Thomas Jipping, Vice-President for Legal Policy at the Free Congress Foundation, and Virginia Armstrong, National Chairman of Eagle Forum's Court Watch.

      Below is JAIL's remedy for positive judicial accountability of the Federal bench. We will, through passage of JAIL throughout the fifty states, have enough clout to force Congress to pass the below federal legislation, or commit political suicide. JAIL's back is the 23rd Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. However, for the time being, JAIL will give Congress a chance to pass this federal legislation. We encourage everyone receiving this to advance it to their Congressman and Senator and urge its soon passage.

      Judicial Accountability & Integrity Legislation

      (As amended 8/05/2000)

      (a) Preamble. The House of Representatives finds: that an inordinate and ever-growing number of complaints for willful misconduct have been lodged with Congress involving federal judges across this nation; that the current Title 28 U.S.C. ยง372(c) (Judicial Misconduct and Disability Act) is in many cases inadequate due to conflicts of interest of judges judging themselves; that judicial integrity is of major importance which affects all areas of our American society. Be it therefore resolved that the House of Representatives assembled hereby enacts the following legislation which shall be known as the "Judicial Accountability and Integrity Legislation."

      (b) Definitions. For purposes of this statute:

      1. The term "blocking" shall mean any act that impedes the lawful conclusion of a case, to include unreasonable delay and willful rendering of a void judgment or order.

      2. The term "federal judge" or "judge" shall mean any federal justice, judge, magistrate, commissioner, or any person shielded by judicial immunity.

      3. The term "Juror" shall mean a Special Federal Grand Juror.

      4. The term "strike" shall mean an adverse immunity decision based upon bad behavior as set forth by paragraph (c), or a criminal conviction as set forth in paragraph (r).

      Where appropriate, the singular shall include the plural, and the plural the singular.

      (c) Immunity. Notwithstanding common law or any other provision to the contrary, no immunities shall be extended to any federal judge except as is specifically set forth in this statute. Preserving the purpose of protecting judges from frivolous and harassing actions, no immunity shielding a federal judge shall be construed to extend to any deliberate violation of law, fraud or conspiracy, intentional violation of due process of law, deliberate disregard of material facts, judicial acts without jurisdiction, blocking of a lawful conclusion of a case, or any deliberate violation of the Constitution of these United States, all violations of which shall constitute bad behavior.

      (d) Special Federal Grand Jury. There is hereby created within the District of Columbia a twenty-five member Special Federal Grand Jury with full federal geographical jurisdiction having power to judge on both law and fact. Their responsibility shall be limited to determining, on an objective standard, whether a civil suit against a federal judge would be frivolous and harassing, or fall within the exclusions of immunity as set forth herein, and whether there is probable cause of criminal conduct by the federal judge complained of.

      (e) Professional Counsel. The Special Federal Grand Jury shall have exclusive power to retain non-governmental advisors, special prosecutors, and investigators, as needed, who shall serve no longer than two years, after which term said officers shall be ineligible. However, with permission of the Special Federal Grand Jury, a special prosecutor may prosecute their current cases through all appeals and any applicable complaints to the Special Federal Grand Jury.

      (f) Establishment of a Special Federal Grand Jury Seat. A Special Federal Grand Jury seat is hereby created, which seat shall be located in excess of one mile of any federal judicial body.

      (g) Annual Funding. Congress hereby deducts two and nine-tenths percent from the gross judicial salaries of all federal judges, which amount shall be deposited regularly into the exclusive trust account created by this statute in paragraph (k) for its operational expenses, together with filing fees under paragraph (h), surcharges under paragraph (i), and fines imposed under paragraph (r).

      (h) Filing Fees. Attorneys representing a client filing a civil complaint or answer before the Special Federal Grand Jury, shall at the time of filing pay a fee equal to the filing fee due in a civil appeal to the United States Supreme Court. Individuals filing a civil complaint or answer before the Special Federal Grand Jury in their own behalf as a matter of right, shall, at the time of filing, post a fee of one hundred dollars, or file a declaration, which shall remain confidential, stating they are impoverished and unable to pay and/or object to such fee.

      (i) Surcharges. Should this statute lack sufficient funding through its fines, fees, and forfeitures (including deductions in paragraph (g)), Congress may impose appropriate surcharges upon the civil court filing fees of corporate litigants as necessary to make this statute self-supporting, or they may appropriate any and all the necessary funds for the full implementation of this statute by legislation, notwithstanding the two and nine-tenths percent deduction of the salaries of federal judges.

      (j) Compensation of Jurors. Each Juror shall receive a salary commensurate to fifty percent of a federal district judge prorated according to the number of days actually served.

      (k) Annual Budget. The Special Federal Grand Jury shall have an annual operational budget commensurate to twenty times the combined salaries of the twenty-five Jurors serving full time, which sum shall be initially deposited by Congress into an exclusive trust account to be annually administered by the Controller. Should the trust balance, within any budget year, drop to less than an amount equivalent to the annual gross salaries of fifty federal district judges, the Controller shall so notify Congress which shall replenish the account, prorated based on the actual average expenditures during the budget year. Should the trust balance in any subsequent year exceed the annual operational budget at the beginning of a new budget year, the Controller shall return such excess to the United States Treasury.

      (l) Jurisdiction. The Special Federal Grand Jury shall have exclusive power to establish rules assuring their attendance, to provide internal discipline, and to remove any of its members on grounds of misconduct. The Special Federal Grand Jury shall immediately assign a docket number to each complaint brought before it. Except as provided in paragraph (s), no complaint of judicial misconduct shall be considered by the Special Federal Grand Jury unless the complainant shall have first attempted to exhaust all judicial remedies available in the federal courts within the immediately preceding six-month period. Such six-month period, however, shall not commence in complaints of prior fraud or blocking of a lawful conclusion until after the date the Special Federal Grand Jury becomes functional. This provision is intended to apply remedially and retroactively.

      (m) Qualifications of Jurors. A Juror shall have attained to the age of thirty years, and have been nine years a citizen of the United States, and an inhabitant of Washington, D.C. Those not eligible for Special Federal Grand Jury service shall include elected and appointed officials, members of the Bar, judges (active or retired), judicial, prosecutorial and law enforcement personnel, without other exclusion except previous adjudication of mental incapacity, imprisonment, or parole from a conviction of a felonious crime against persons.

      (n) Selection of Jurors. The Jurors shall serve without compulsion and shall be drawn by public lot by the Secretary of State from names on the voters rolls and any citizen submitting his/her name to the Secretary of State for such drawing.

      (o) Service of Jurors. Excluding the establishment of the initial Special Federal Grand Jury, each Juror shall serve one year. No Juror shall serve more than once. On the first day of each month, two persons shall be rotated off the Special Federal Grand Jury and new Citizens seated, except in January it shall be three. Vacancies shall be filled on the first of the following month in addition to the Jurors regularly rotated, and the Juror chosen to fill a vacancy shall complete only the remainder of the term of the Juror replaced.

      (p) Procedures. The Special Federal Grand Jury shall serve a copy of the filed complaint upon the subject judge and notice to the complainant of such service. The judge shall have thirty days to serve and file an answer. The complainant shall have twenty days to reply to the judge's answer. (Upon timely request, the Special Federal Grand Jury may provide for extensions for good cause.) The Special Federal Grand Jury shall have power to subpoena witnesses, documents, and other tangible evidence, and to examine witnesses under oath. The Special Federal Grand Jury shall determine the causes properly before it with their reasoned findings in writing within one hundred twenty (120) calendar days, serving on all parties their decision on whether immunity shall be barred as a defense to any civil action that may thereafter be pursued against the federal judge. A rehearing may be requested of the Special Federal Grand Jury within twenty days with service upon the opposition. Twenty days shall be allowed to reply thereto. Thereafter, the Special Federal Grand Jury shall render final determination within thirty days. All allegations of the complaint shall be liberally construed in favor of the complainant. The Jurors shall keep in mind, in making their decisions, that they are entrusted by the people of these United States with the duty of restoring a perception of justice and accountability of the federal judiciary, and are not to be swayed by artful presentation by the federal judge. They shall avoid all influence by judicial and government entities. The statute of limitations on any civil suit brought pursuant to this statute against a federal judge shall not commence until the rendering of a final decision by the Special Federal Grand Jury. Special Federal Grand Jury files shall always remain public record following their final determination. A majority of thirteen shall determine any matter.

      (q) Removal. Whenever any federal judge shall have received more than three strikes, the federal judge shall automatically be brought up on charges before Congress for Articles of Impeachment by the Special Federal Grand Jury through its special prosecutor for bad behavior and willful misconduct. Congress thereafter shall commence to a vote on such Articles of Impeachment. Upon a conviction, the federal judge shall be permanently removed from office. He may also be held liable under any other appropriate criminal or civil proceeding.

      (r) Indictment. Should the Special Federal Grand Jury also find probable cause of criminal conduct on the part of any federal judge against whom a complaint is docketed, it shall have the power to indict such federal judge except where double jeopardy attaches. The Special Federal Grand Jury shall, without voir dire beyond personal relationship, cause to be impaneled special trial jurors, plus alternates, which trial jurors shall be instructed that they have power to judge both law and fact. The Special Federal Grand Jury shall also select a non-governmental special prosecutor and a federal judge with no more than four years on the bench from a state other than that of the defendant judge, (or outside of the District of Columbia, if the case so be). The trial jury shall be selected from the same pool of jury candidates as any regular federal jury. The special prosecutor shall thereafter prosecute the cause to a conclusion, having all the powers of any other prosecutor within these United States. Upon conviction, the special trial jury shall have exclusive power of sentencing (limited to incarceration, fines and/or community service), which shall be derived by an average of the sentences of the trial jurors.

      (s) Criminal Procedures. In addition to any other provisions of this statute, a complaint for criminal conduct of a federal judge may be brought directly to the Special Federal Grand Jury upon all the following prerequisites: (1) an affidavit of criminal conduct has been lodged with the appropriate prosecutorial entity within ninety (90) days of the commission of the alleged conduct; (2) the prosecutor declines to prosecute, or one hundred twenty (120) days has passed following the lodging of such affidavit and prosecution has not commenced; (3) an indictment, if sought, has not been specifically declined on the merits by a Grand Jury; and (4) the criminal statute of limitations has not run. Any criminal conviction (including a plea bargain) under any judicial process shall constitute a strike.

      (t) Public Indemnification. No federal judge complained of, or sued civilly by a complainant pursuant to this statute shall be defended at public expense or by any elected or appointed public counsel, nor shall any federal judge be reimbursed from public funds for any losses sustained under this statute.

      (u) Redress. The provisions of this statute are in addition to other redress that may exist and are not mutually exclusive.

      (v) Preeminence. Preeminence shall be given to this statute in any case of conflicts with any other federal statutes, case law, or common law to the contrary. The foreperson of the Special Federal Grand Jury shall read, or cause to be read, this statute to the respective Jurors semi-annually during the first week of business in January and July.

      Proposed Bill written for Congress by Representative Ronald Branson, 11024 Balboa, #214, Granada Hills, CA. 91344. Branson ran for office and was publicly elected in ’96, and re-elected in ’98 and 2000 as Representative, Office of the Republican Central Committee for the County of Los Angeles. He currently represents in the 38th Assembly District of California. Branson has taken up the cause of cleaning up the courts, both state and federal, and has gained a national following with twenty-six states actively pursuing his legislation through state J.A.I.L. Chapters. He is constantly invited on the radio and to speaking engagements, and is among the most knowledgeable in this country on the issue of judicial corruption.

      * * *

      J.A.I.L. is an acronym for (Judicial Accountability Initiative Law)
      JAIL's very informative website is found at www.jail4judges.org
      JAIL proposes a unique new addition to our form of government.
      JAIL is powerful! JAIL is dynamic! JAIL is America's ONLY hope!
      JAIL's is spreading across America like a fast moving wildfire!
      JAIL is making inroads into Congress for federal accountability!
      JAIL may be supported at P.O. Box 207, N. Hollywood, CA 91603
      To subscribe or be removed:  add-remove-jail@...
      To send published judicial articles: USA-jail4judges@...
      To contact the author of JAIL4Judges: jail4judges@...
      All E-Groups are encouraged to sign on at jail4judges@egroups.com
      "..it does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds.." - Samuel Adams
      "There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one who is
      striking at the root."                         -- Henry David Thoreau    <><
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.