* * * Enforcing The Law, But Violating The Constitution! * * *
- Enforcing The Law,
But Violating The Constitution!
By Ron Branson
April 8, 2013
We are in an age of passing laws. There is a law for everything! Whenever we perceive that something has gone wrong, we automatically think that we need to legislate another law. We even have a saying, "There outa be a law against that!" We now have more laws than any human being can possible reckon with.
Surprising to most, the more laws legislated within a nation, the more evil the nation becomes, for righteousness comes not by the law. Every tyrant establishes his dictatorship by new laws. Adolf Hitler was lawfully elected to office, and it was through fear instilled in the People that he announced, "An evil exists that threatens every man, woman, and child of this great nation. We must take steps to ensure our domestic security and protect our homeland." It was through fear that he instituted domestic security laws, creating the dreaded Gestapo that brought about the killing of millions of his own nation. Appropriate here is the quote of Benjamin Franklin, "Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
Now as to America, let us take up just one class of the enumerable hundreds of thousands of laws now on the books; - Gun laws. There are currently an estimated 20,000 laws relating to gun ownership. Federal laws, state laws, county laws, city and local regulations. There are even imagined gun laws that are not laws, but enforced as laws.
Right now Congress is fighting over proposed passage of a number of new gun laws in addition to the already 20,000 existing gun laws. Does it dawn on anybody, that there are absolutely no guns laws that can be passed that will quell the issue of the right of the People to keep and bear arms? We just as well pass a law making it a crime to commit suicide with the penalty being death! We could even increase the penalty if the person uses a bomb to blow themselves. Gee, we could eliminate armed bank robberies by posting signs "No guns allowed in bank." I think you have gotten my point.
With respect to these 20,000 gun laws in America there is but one gun law that controls all others, and it reads, "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." To those unfamiliar with those words, it is the Second Amendment of the U.S Constitution. Those words were initiated by our Founding Fathers and placed into our Constitution, and those words have never changed throughout the entire history of the United States.
And for those unfamiliar with the Constitution, it is the supreme law of the land, to wit; "This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding. The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; ..." Article VI, Clause 2 & 3. So the entire gun debate boils down to this. The supreme law of land verses the nineteen thousand, nine hundred and ninety nine laws infringing the supreme law of the land.
The battle line seems to be clear. According to the politicians, the Second Amendment should read; "Swarms of uniformed officers bearing guns and badges being necessary to keep us all safe, the people may have and bear such specified arms under specified and restricted circumstances as approved by federal, state, and local politicians and judges. Under no circumstances shall such arms have clips in excess of ten rounds, nor shall such arms look like one of those viewed by liberal politicians as an assault rifle, having a scope, a flash guard, and a collapsible stock. Such permitted guns shall only be used at authorized shooting ranges and for authorized hunting of specified animals. Such restrictions may be extended on any notion at any time without further notice."
I have entitled this article, "Enforcing The Law, But Violating The Constitution." So what is the point? My point is that the People will regain the plan wording of the Second Amendment when they decide to adopt the JAIL4Judges provision enforcing the pure words of the Constitution.
Paragraph 2 of the California Judicial Accountability Initiative Law specifies, 2. Exclusions of immunity. Notwithstanding common law or any other provision to the contrary, no immunities shielding a judge from frivolous and harassing actions shall be construed to extend to any deliberate violation of law, fraud or conspiracy, intentional violation of due process of law, deliberate disregard of material allegations, judicial acts without jurisdiction, blocking of a lawful conclusion of a case, or any deliberate violation of the Constitutions of California or the United States." The full provisions of J.A.I.L. are provided for you here, http://www.jail4judges.org.
Under the J.A.I.L. Provisions who determines if any judge has deliberately violated the Constitution? It is us, we the People. We have the absolute power and authority of defanging nineteen thousand, nine hundred and ninety nine politicians gun laws in one swift swoop with the sword of the supreme law of the land. And we do it through the Initiative Process, "All political power is inherent in the People. ... they have the right to alter or reform [government] when the public good may require." Art. II, Sec. 1, Calif. Const. Also in other state's Constitutions.
This gun issue alone will sweep judges off the bench with its "Three Strikes and You Are Out" penalty as judges seek to enforce all these politicans gun laws that infringe upon the Second Amendment. The People will be saying, in effect, "What part of '...shall not be infringed,' do you not understand?"
National J.A.I.L. Commander-In-Chief