Right Premise, Wrong Tactic
Right Premise, Wrong Tactic
I agree with your premise, Dick Marple, that nothing will be done until we defeat the Federal Reserve System. In one of my public presentations I asked the audience how many of them believed the Federal Reserve was unconstitutional. Everyone in the audience raised their hands. I then said, Then the answer is quite simple. Why don't we just bring an action against the Federal Reserve in Federal Court and challenge its constitutionality? I then gave a dramatic pause for everyone to think on that. Then I said, The constitutionality of the Federal Reserve has indeed been challenged many times in Federal Court. So why do we still have a Federal Reserve System after all these many years?
I then pointed out that the problem was not the Federal Reserve, they were only doing what they could get away with, but the Federal Judiciary covering for the Federal Reserve. So long as we have five attorneys in black robes sitting on the U.S. Supreme Court supporting the existence of the Federal Reserve, we shall continue to have an unconstitutional Federal Reserve controlling our monetary system, which we all agree upon should be abolished.
I have point out that every evil of which we find egregious, is continuing because the courts have established it to be so. One gentleman on my left lifted his hand and I recognized him. He said that he did not believe that God was so disturbed by the courts as He was about murdering babies. He thus made my instant point. Why are we murdering babies? It is because of the case of Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113, which declared that it is alright and proper to murder babies, and we have no right to prevent such debauchery. So, so long as the Federal Courts say it is okay to murder babies, the practice of murdering babies shall continue, as also will an unconstitutional Federal Reserve Banking System. If we defeated the Federal Reserve, but continued murdering babies, would we be satisfied? Absolutely not! This is why I contend that we shall continue on our downward course until we the People enforce JAIL4Judges. There are thousands of unconstitutional laws on the books. Must we fight each and everyone piecemeal? And would not such wicked men just continue to pass unconstitutional laws, leaving us to constantly put out brush fires? We thus could never accomplish anything but trying to stop those who Rep us from Reping us.
We need not "repeal" the Federal Reserve Act as it was never a constitutional law in the first place. The Constitution is extremely clear on who must exclusively control our monetary system, and that power is not transferable to private banksters! If everyone believes a lie, does that make it the truth? "The general misconception is that any statute passed by legislators bearing the appearance of law constitutes the law of the land. The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and any statute, to be valid, must be In agreement. It is impossible for both the Constitution and a law violating it to be valid; one must prevail. This is succinctly stated as follows:
The General rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of it's enactment and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it. An unconstitutional law, in legal contemplation, is as inoperative as if it had never been passed. Such a statute leaves the question that it purports to settle just as it would be had the statute not been enacted.
Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principles follow that it imposes no duties, confers no rights, creates no office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection, and justifies no acts performed under it.....
A void act cannot be legally consistent with a valid one. An unconstitutional law cannot operate to supersede any existing valid law. Indeed, insofar as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the lend, it is superseded thereby.
No one Is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it." 16 Am Jur 2d, Sec 177 late 2d, Sec 256. Shall we also "repeal" Roe v. Wade?Ron Branson
* * *
Dick Marple wrote:
RON... TO COMPLIMENT HOSEA 4-6, LET ME ADD....I have hi-lighted #12 which I find most inspiring...
King James Version (KJV)10 Finally, my brethren, be strong in the Lord, and in the power of his might.
11 Put on the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil.
12 For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.
13 Wherefore take unto you the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand.
Sum that up as "Government", which created the Federal Reserve System of unredeemable fiat currency and what is the foundation of all corruption. It is said that NOTHING CAN, nor WILL CHANGE, until the Federal Reserve is repealed and in the dust-bin of History.
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 08:19:02 -0700
Subject: Despairing Situation - So what are we going to do about it?
Kirk, I agree with you that nothing will be done until the rule of law prevails. However, the rule of law will never prevail so long as we have a judiciary that is free to violate that "rule of law" at whim, based upon their assertion that they are covered by judicial immunity, and do need not honor their Oaths of Office or the supreme law of the land.
In order to accomplish judicial accountability, we need JAIL4Judges, as enforced by you and me. How can we ascend higher than ourselves in that enforcement? If not us, then Who? If not Now, then When? Without us, enforcement of "The Rule of Law" are only words! We have found the enemy, and the enemy is us. "My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee." Hosea 4:6.