Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Georgia Judiciary: Rash of Judges Stepping Down After Misconduct

Expand Messages
  • JAIL4Judges.org
    * The Atlanta Journal-Constitution (Georgia)* August 22, 2010 http://www.ajc.com/news/rash-of-judges-stepping-596966.html Rash of judges stepping down after
    Message 1 of 1 , Sep 14, 2010
    • 0 Attachment

      The Atlanta Journal-Constitution  (Georgia)

      August 22, 2010


      Rash of judges stepping down after misconduct

      By Bill Torpy and Bill Rankin

      The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

      One sent a message over Facebook to a criminal defendant, saying he’d give her behind-the-scenes advice on her case. Another was caught having sex in a parked car with the public defender assigned to his courtroom. Another inappropriately touched a prosecutor and investigator after they sat in his lap posing for a photo.

      Staff 2005 photo After hearing from the Judicial Qualifications Commission, Fayette County Judge Johnnie Caldwell resigned this year amid allegations he repeatedly sexually harassed a female attorney.

      These were not defendants. All three were chief judges in their circuits with decades on the bench.

      Since 2008, at least 16 judges across the state have resigned under duress, most recently two veteran chief judges from Cobb and Fulton counties. Some stepped down under a cloud of suspicion. Others left amid scandal or even outright criminality.

      Allegations include sexual improprieties, harassment, voter fraud, giving state computers to family members and gross intemperance on the bench.

      Why is there so much disorder in the courts?

      “This is the worst rash of judicial misconduct I’ve ever seen,” said former Georgia Supreme Court Chief Justice Norman Fletcher. “There have been far too many, and it doesn’t reflect well on the judiciary. You can’t explain some of this conduct.”

      Judges haven’t just started misbehaving, court watchers say. The news of one sensational case after another has created a snowball effect, prompting more complaints being filed with the Judicial Qualifications Commission, the state agency that investigates judges. Those complaints are also being investigated more efficiently, leading to quicker resolutions.

      This month, Cobb County Superior Court Chief Judge Kenneth Nix abruptly announced he would leave Oct. 6 and admitted he had “flicked” the two women’s bottoms while they sat in his lap for a photo. The women countered in a public statement that it was no playful touch, it was a “sex crime.”

      In Fulton, State Court Chief Judge A.L. Thompson, on the bench 30 years, notified the governor by letter Aug. 5 that “it is time to move on.” Thompson insists he was not being investigated for malfeasance. But judges have long complained about Thompson’s absences, and electronic parking garage records provided to The Atlanta Journal-Constitution showed he came to the courthouse just 56 days in a seven-month period.

      Last week, Thompson issued a statement saying the JQC had not “interviewed” him nor had the JQC disciplined him. He declined to say whether he had met with a JQC investigator before announcing he would step down on Sept. 6. The judge, in an interview, noted health issues have long bedeviled him.

      Superior Court Judge Frank Mills III, chief of the Cherokee County circuit, said judges have noticed the resignations. “I think we’re all bewildered by it; we all talk about it,” he said. “But most of these cases are not similar, so it’s hard to say there’s any trend.”

      It’s not unusual for judges to make enemies, given the gravity of their decisions, such as assigning child custody and sentencing people to prison. Because judges are so powerful, few people are willing to file complaints against them.

      “Think about the inherent nature of a judge; how many people will be critical of you?” asked Habersham County District Attorney Brian Rickman, who investigated one judge in his circuit and watched as another’s career disintegrated. “Most people, like lawyers and court employees, try to keep you happy. There’s a danger of too many people trying to kiss your butt.”

      But increased efforts by the JQC seem to be getting results.

      “The recent spate of resignations is a radical difference from what happened five years ago,” said John Mrosek, a Fayetteville lawyer who twice ran unsuccessfully against Judge Johnnie Caldwell. The judge resigned this year following allegations he repeatedly sexually harassed a female attorney.

      “How many people witnessed Caldwell and [Chief Superior Court Judge Paschal] English doing what they did and turned a blind eye?” Mrosek asked. “Once there’s a psychology of not following the rules, it pervades everything.”

      English resigned abruptly in April amid revelations he was having an affair with then-public defender Kim Cornwell, who had hundreds of cases before the judge.

      Both Caldwell and English resigned soon after meeting with JQC investigator Richard Hyde.

      A year ago, Hyde, a former Atlanta police detective, was given authority by the JQC board to confront judges with allegations and his investigative findings and negotiate a quick resignation if warranted.

      That was the case in the resignations of Caldwell and English, Mrosek said. “[The JQC] came in, pointed a pistol at them and said, ‘Easy way or hard way.’ ”

      Hyde, he added, “is traveling around the state collecting scalps.”

      Hyde declined comment.

      Most judges choose to resign when confronted rather than go through the embarrassing process of having the commission bring formal, and public, charges against them. If they resign, the allegations often remain secret, which has brought criticism of the agency.

      Some judges fight the charges and go to trial, with the Georgia Supreme Court issuing a final opinion. In the case of Twiggs County Probate Judge Kenneth Fowler, witnesses at his trial said Fowler swore at defendants, ordered parties to “shut up,” referred to African-Americans as “colored” and required defendants to prove their innocence.

      “His ignorance of the law is inexcusable, and his abuse of his judicial office unacceptable,” the state Supreme Court said in June, removing Fowler.

      The commission has been increasingly aggressive since 2008, when South Georgia judges Brooks E. Blitch III and Berrien Sutton resigned after the JQC brought corruption charges against them.

      “That has heightened the interest in the role of the JQC,” said Robert Ingram, a lawyer and one of the JQC’s seven commissioners. “I think that leads to more cases being filed. People who may have had a complaint may have thought the JQC would [now] take it seriously.”

      Some complain the JQC acts too slowly. Joe Hendricks, a district attorney in North Georgia, said that it took almost 10 months for the agency to bring formal counts of misconduct against Superior Court Judge Oliver Harris “Harry” Doss Jr. He was accused of taking state computers for his family, insulting and threatening court staff and repeatedly failing to rule on cases, backlogging the system.

      JQC probes are secret, “but a lot of people at the courthouse were aware of the investigation because several people were questioned,” Hendricks said. “This hung over our heads for nine of 10 months. Those months were very difficult. ... There’s kids awaiting a decision on their custody, defendants waiting for a trial. There’s too many lives hanging.”

      The judge resigned in December. Hendricks said that, with Doss no longer on the bench, senior judges closed 1,314 cases the first half of 2010, 302 more than the same time last year with Doss on the bench.

      Ingram acknowledged the system can be slow, but noted the JQC has an annual budget of about $250,000 and a state judiciary with more than 1,800 members. “I think Georgia’s budget is the smallest of all 50 states when compared to the number of judges,” he said.

      Muscogee Superior Court Judge John D. Allen, the JQC’s vice chair, expects the number of judges leaving abruptly will “play out for a period of time.” But the publicity might prompt some wayward judges to clean up their act.

      “It’s not a message we’re trying to send. But, yeah, it’s a deterrent.”


      Ron Branson comments on above

      It is seldom we hear anything positive from any state judicial commission. Such commissions began here in California in 1960, and soon was taken over by politics.

      Prior to the creation of the judicial commissions, Grand Juries heard and conducted investigations on complaints against judges. But in line with the judicially self-made doctrine of judicial immunity, it was deemed politically best if judges were left to be investigated by a commission made up of mostly judges.

      Legislation began to come about taking all investigations of judges out of the hands of the People sitting in the forum of the Grand Juries, and turning it over to these judicial commissions. Citizen's complaint then arose stating that these commissions were made up majorly of judges covering up for other judges. Initiatives then arose tossing more money at these commissions hoping that more positive actions would be forthcoming from these commissions. Also, a shift in majority judicial seats on these judicial commission came about requiring one less judge than half its members.

      Nonetheless, its members were still political hacks in favor of covering up for judges. For instance, one non-judge member was appointed by the governor who seats the judges. The State Attorney General appoints one, who himself defends the judges in the state when they are sued. The Chief Justice appoints one non-judge, who himself is over all the entire judiciary.

      So much for perceived judicial oversight. And let us not forget that everything these commissions do, they do in the secret of total darkness.

      The first attempt, if other than ditching the complaint, is to secretly offer the judge an opportunity to resign for some rinkydink reason, i.e. time with family, too old, etc. Usually these resignations are arranged with a predetermined appointment to their judgeship with the eye of the forthcoming election in which this judge to fill in can now go on the ballot as the "incumbent." It is in this manor they establish the likelihood that no outsider will ever arise to the bench.

      For those who have not had their eyes opened as yet, everything about the judicial system is fixed. They feel that so long as they control the bench, they control the entire government, and thus, the People. The sad truth about this is that their plan is quite effective, and "judicial immunity" thus rules the day! I personally know how things are run within the judiciary. I have many years of experience. Only until we establish a People's Independent Special Grand Jury will we ever be able to free ourselves for this judicial quagmire.

      Ron Branson
      National J.A.I.L. Commander-In-Chief

    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.