Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

* * * "Secure Flight," Insecure Travel Rights * * *

Expand Messages
  • JAIL4Judges
    JAILers4Justice (J4J) ____________________________________________________________ Los Angeles, CA August 20, 2009 A Public Service Announcement to America (To
    Message 1 of 1 , Aug 20, 2009
    View Source
    • 0 Attachment

       

      JAILers4Justice (J4J)
      ____________________________________________________________
      Los Angeles, CA                                                       August 20, 2009

      A Public Service Announcement to America

      (To be removed from this PSA see instructions below)

      ____________________________________________________________

      The Battle Lines are Drawn:  J.A.I.L. versus The Foreign Power 

      A Power Foreign to Our Constitution

      ____________________________________________________________

      Mission Statement      JNJ Library        Federal J.A.I.L.

      FAQs              What?MeWarden?

      ____________________________________________________________ 

       

      "Secure Flight," Insecure Travel Rights
      By Michael Ostrolenk, Robert E. Smith, Richard Sobel and Jan Towe
      Published 08/18/09

      Starting this year, Americans will have to get government approval to travel by air. As Privacy Journal revealed last fall, henceforth "Permission Now Needed to Travel Within U.S." Getting a reservation and checking-in for air travel will soon require Transportation Security Administration authorization. That permission is by no means assured: For example, if your name matches a "no-fly" list, even mistakenly, you can be denied the right to a reserve a seat on a flight. If your name is on a "selectee" list, you and your possessions will be searched more thoroughly before you can board. What is going on here?

      Protecting air safety is essential, but professional screening at airports already provides for it. Giving the TSA as an official agency the additional authority to decide who gets to go where reaches beyond safety into overextended governmental power. This newly minted "Secure Flight" rule fundamentally imbalances long-standing citizens' rights both to travel and to be left alone. If your name appears among hundreds of thousands on "watchlists," you assert that the government should not require ID to fly, you don't want to reveal your date of birth for concern about identity theft, or you don't choose to declare your gender, you can stay home.

      By combining the requirement for government photo IDs in order to fly with checking government watchlists including potentially every passenger, "Secure Flight" puts the federal government into the business of licensing travel. All travelers will need government OK in order to board a flight, or take a cruise. What the government can allow one day, it can forbid the next. All things considered, isn't this a higher-tech and later-day version of South African domestic passports or eastern European checkpoints? In fact, because of the high technological capacity of the U.S. version, aren't its implications for travel control of plane, train, bus and subway travel much more far reaching? It's incredible that something like this is happening relatively unrecognized in America .

      While some people consider the requirement to show ID or reveal a birth date a small trade-off for security, what is at stake here is the right to travel. That fundamental freedom of movement appears in the Articles of Confederation in the right to freely enter and leave all the states of the then small union. It was so fundamentally a part of American citizenship that the privileges and immunities clauses of the Constitution included it without explicitly mentioning it again for the more perfect union. With a large and expansive nation now ranging from Hawaii and Alaska to Washington DC , that right to travel nationally, and petition the distant government, is even more fundamental. Yet some courts maintain that if you can walk, you don't need the right to fly. People have the right to walk around freely without carrying a national ID; why do they have to show one to travel? The Supreme Court has yet to rule on the scope of the right to travel but lower courts have tended to restrict it more narrowly than the Founding Fathers would approve.

      Clearly, the air ID and "Secure Flight" rules mean you cannot travel any distance reachable only by air without official permission. Moreover, the system can easily be extended to Amtrak as a government railroad, which already requires government ID in order to purchase a ticket. It can further be extended to urban rapid-transit networks tied to travel cards, and private inter-city buses requiring IDs to buy tickets or board coaches. These are the bases for an internal passport system in the U.S.

      There are a lot of practical issues here too. The assumption that any "no-fly" list includes all potential wrong doers is implausible, and first time criminals would by definition not appear until it's too late. Many people on these lists are there because their names are similar to those who are suspect for other reasons. There are perhaps a few hundred people whose past activities merit keeping them off the streets, let alone flights; the small group is better caught through search warrants and good police work before they come to the airport. To demand that 750 million annual passengers have to get government permissions to fly creates a needle in-a-haystack approach to locating a few potential wrongdoers (none so far have been caught by the matching). "Secure Flight" is simply an ineffective use of scarce resources that sweeps much too broadly over people's most basic rights to travel and be let alone.

      What can you do? Like other regulations quickly promulgated at the end of an outgoing administration, these rules need to be delayed and reconstituted. Contact your Senators, Representatives and the White House to suspend such ill-considered regulations now. Insist that the government create a system that makes flying safe without granting federal officials the final say over permission for citizens to travel. Otherwise, the traveling public may be detoured onto a perilous downhill road to being permanently grounded.  

       

      ______________________________________________

      Ron Branson’s Comment:

      Th above is already in practical practice! The last time I took a flight, I was confronted over my spiritual views involving the SSN (Socialist Slave Number). It became apparent that if one opposes Socialism or is not a practicing Socialist, he is regarded as unfit for flight travel, and this was three year ago. And I am sure it has gotten much worse since that time. One is not regarded as having a right to equal protection of the law in such cases.

      One other comment. The above asks, What can you do? Like other regulations quickly promulgated at the end of an outgoing administration, these rules need to be delayed and reconstituted. Contact your Senators, Representatives …” It amazes me that I am constantly bombarded by ignorant people who ask me to contact my Rep. and ask him to stop Repping me. Personally, I think I have been Repped-Off enough, but the People never learn. These Reps do not have your best interest at heart. They are looking to stick-it-to-ya before you know what has happened as a  rapist who raped you while you slept.

      The answer is not “contact your Rep,” but rather exercising your valuable People’s Initiative process to bring about judicial accountability on the single issue of judicial immunity! Until this is done, the People shall continue to “…weep and howl for [their] miseries that shall come upon [them].” James 5:1. And will ye hear the 1933 exhortation of Chief Justice Marshall,  “The Judicial Department comes home in its effects to every man's fireside; it passes on his property, his reputation, his life, his all. Is it not, to the last degree important, that he should be rendered perfectly and completely independent, with nothing to influence or control him but God and his conscience?  ... I have always thought, from my earliest youth till now, that the greatest scourge an angry Heaven ever inflicted upon an ungrateful and a sinning people, was an ignorant, a corrupt, or a dependent Judiciary.” 

       

      -- Chief Justice Marshall - Virginia State Convention, 1829-1830 (pp. 616, 619), O'Donoghue v. U.S. , 289 U.S. 516 (1933).

       

      J.A.I.L. (Judicial Accountability Initiative Law) www.jail4judges.orghas been in existence since 1995, and is in all 50 states and foreign countries.

      To manage your email, place the word Subscribe or Unsubscribe

      in 'subject' line and hit reply. Your request will be automatically & instantly

      processed.

       

      Our Founding Fathers said, "...with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine

      Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes, and

      our sacred honor." Dec. of Independence . We are a ministry in great need of

      your financial support. Donate to this vitally important work at;

      "J.A.I.L."  P.O. Box 207 , North Hollywood , CA 91603

       

      J.A.I.L. is a unique addition to our Constitution heretofore unrealized.

      JAIL is powerful! JAIL is dynamic! JAIL is America 's ONLY hope!

       

      J.A.I.L. has not been tried and found wanting.

      Rather it has been found difficult and left untried!

       

      E-Group sign on at http://groups. yahoo.com/ group/jail4judge s/join

      Visit our active flash - http://www.jail4jud ges.org/national _001.htm

       

      *   *   *

      He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to

      our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his assent to

      their acts of pretended legislation.    - Declaration of Independence
       
      "..it does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless

      minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds.."  - Samuel Adams
       
      "There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one who is

      striking at the root."   -- Henry David Thoreau                    

      ><)))'>

       

    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.