Preparing for the Battle
Ron Branson - National J.A.I.L. CIC
Below is a
short blurb about protecting our California judges from the public. In order to
gain the significance of their words, one must understand their buzz words,
so I will translate the below for you. First off, Pete Wilson was a former
Republican governor of California, and Gray Davis was the immediate former
Democratic governor of California. So what we are seeing proposed here is the
participation of both major political parties rallying together to the cause of
protecting California judges from the public criticism.
As has been
stated over and over by the judiciary, to include former Justice Sandra Day
O'Connor, never before has the political system witnessed such "harsh"
attacks upon the judiciary as is currently taking place. Such brutality against
the judges makes one want to cry.
Now for a little
background. Back in 1995 when J.A.I.L. first began, all political attention was
being given only to two branches of government, to wit, the
legislature and the executive. Everything was, who is going to be president,
senator, congressman, assembly, governor, etc. No attention was being given
to the judges. So J.A.I.L set out to shine the light of exposure
of the judges and successfully brought them to the forefront of
publicity. In those days search engines revealed no websites about judges
with the exception one set up by the judges themselves complaining that
they were being deprived of sufficient salaries to meet the excellent
services they were providing the public.
and eventually did, change perception so that judicial exposes popped
up all over the internet like mushrooms. J.A.I.L. has pumped out an
estimated 15 million emails to date constantly exposing and hitting the judges
in every way imaginable. We were dedicated to, and focused entirely on
exposing the judges and no other cause.
In fact, J.A.I.L.
(Judicial Accountability Initiative Law) made the words "Judicial
Accountability" intensely popular as witnessed by entering those two words into
Google today. I just did, and it came up with over 63,000 references. These two
words, "Judicial Accountability," has become immensely famous within the titles
of many organizations, conferences, seminars, and even within words used by
Congress. In that respect J.A.I.L. has accomplished its goal, albeit, that is
not the extent of what J.A.I.L. seeks to accomplish. It seeks not only to place
those words "judicial accountability" in-your-face of the political
establishment, but also to accomplish judicial accountability in reality, and
not in word only. J.A.I.L. intends to make corrupt officials hear the repeat of
those words "judicial accountability" until they climb into their holes and
cover their ears.
those words "Judicial Accountability" as a ruse, a cosmetic paint job, a means
of giving the public the idea that they are really interested in bringing about
judicial accountability, and thus you need to keep voting for them so they can
stay in office for the sake of bring it about.
are conducted, and demonstrations are held on Capitol Hill all in the name
of "judicial accountability." But have you noticed that little to nothing
is actually productively forthcoming out of those publicity events. I have come
to call these events as the "Meet, Greet, Eat, and Retreat" events, and of
course, let us not forget "Repeat!" Hey, we can make it an annual event of
meeting in Washington based on these two words, "Judicial
Now, back to
former governors Davis and Wilson. What they are really saying is this
organization known as JAIL4Judges is spreading "their" propaganda about bad
judges all over this nation and is making our judges look bad - so very
bad, and we must figure some method of plugging this crack in
this damn. However, their efforts shall forever prove fruitless, for as long as
the judges continue in their manifest arrogance of judicial immunity,
they shall forever show their contempt for the law and constitutional
principles, forever belching out their judge-made laws from the bench.
Never in a
thousand years shall the public find this act tolerable, whether the
people perceive they have a remedy or not. As the saying goes, "You
can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him drink. As long
as judge-made doctrine of judicial immunity continues, I am sure there will
be no shortage of ammunition that can and will be fired at the judiciary.
But you can count on the fact that no matter how "brutal" the battle against
judges gets, they will never willing give it up. They are as addicted to
judicial immunity as a full-blown druggie is to heroin And so, they shall
"forever" complain that we, the public, are placing "improper influence"
upon our judges. After all, according to them, we do not want judges to rule
according to the law, but rather according to our political influence.
The height of
contradictions I have recently seen is comparing J.A.I.L. with special moneyed
interest that wants to interfere with lawful justice in not allowing the judges
to rule properly on the cases before them. What we want is to interfere with
their "judicial independence," and their "impartiality," and give us what we
want, even if we have to "put them in jail for decisions we don't like." In
other words, the problem in this nation is with us, the People, and not with
them, the judges.
not one of our opponents have taken it upon themselves to address the wording of
the J.A.I.L. initiative, namely the second paragraph, to wit,
2. Exclusions of immunity.
Notwithstanding common law or
any other provision to the contrary, no immunities shielding a judge from
frivolous and harassing actions shall be construed to extend to any deliberate
violation of law, fraud or conspiracy, intentional violation of due process of
law, deliberate disregard of material allegations, judicial acts without
jurisdiction, blocking of a lawful conclusion of a case, or any deliberate
violation of the Constitutions of California or the United States. The foregoing
judicial misconduct shall not be construed to mean court decisions made within
the authorized capacity of a judge.
Davis, Wilson Promoting Judge Impartiality
Former Governors Set To Speak At Hearing
POSTED: 6:00 am PDT July 14, 2008
Calif. -- Two former governors were among those planning to talk Monday
about the importance of protecting judges from improper influence.
Former governors Gray Davis and Pete Wilson
were to address the state Commission for Impartial Courts at a hearing in
The commission is studying the political
pressures on courts that threaten judges' fairness and impartiality.
The commission is set to issue its first report next month.
- Ron Branson
Founder of Judicial Accountability Initiative
P.O. Box 207
North Hollywood, CA. 91603
P.S. - I wonder what words of wisdom they
shall have for us in their first report next month! You can believe it is a
secret agenda to neutralize J.A.I.L., and who knows, they may even come out
and mention us by name. Sala Vive "Judicial