Dear Dr. Jones!
- Dear Dr. JonesDear Dr. Jones, your below argument justifies sound reasoning that proves your point. The only problem with your reasoning is that tyrannical insanity trumps sanity, reasoning, the laws, statutes and all constitutional provisions. To illustrate my point I refer you to the following;A U.S. Agricultural Inspector walked onto a farm and showed the farmer his card and said, "I am from the U.S. Department of Agriculture, and I am here to inspect your farm." The farmer said to him, "Okay, you can inspect everything on my farm except that field over there (pointing to the field)." The inspector said, you aren't paying attention to what I said, I have authority to inspect anything I want on this farm. The farmer just turned and walked away.A little later the farmer heard the man shouting in fear as he ran as fast as he could for the fence with a 1,800 pound bull in fast pursuit behind him. The farmer yelled, "Show him your card, show him your card!"I draw your attention to President George Washington's famous quote, "Government is not reason. It is not eloquence. It is FORCE." Everyone who has ever tried to question the validity of George Washington's argument has had to argue that government is indeed reasonable and is not necessarily force. It's a losing argument the moment you make it. It is advisable that you not try to reason with a charging bull that you possess authority.- Ron Branson
From: Dr. Don JONES [mailto:irsinfo@...]
Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2008 2:56 PM
To: JAIL4Judges; irsinfo@...
Subject: Title-15 (USC)
Mail.com is again censoring!
Re: Ron Branson - J.A.I.L. CIC
Relating to: Nancy Lazaryan
Just came across your article; This is in no way a challenge, but simply information not shown elsewhere, that should be known to everyone.
Something smells fishy! 99% of anyone stating they do not have jurisdiction -to do this or that is simply an excuse for professing immunity in one way or another, meaning, -give it up because you’ll get nowhere with your accusation, -regardless. Jurisdiction has many meanings (judicial excuses -pro and con), but you’re bucking false IMMUNITY!
Anyone petitioned regarding jurisdiction or immunity -MUST comply, when you persist loudly enough. Say, -is it my understanding that your statement of jurisdiction actually means immunity?
You must ask them to document the immunity or jurisdiction they profess. Time, date, occurrence, witnesses, application to an individual group, organization, body or a person. The -when, where and what circumstances must be documented -or it is non-existent -meaning it is in violation of many existing statues of law, including the U.S. constitution that has never allowed immunity, nor has any amendment ever been accepted allowing immunity or jurisdictional excuses, also meaning those professing immunity and or those purporting or supporting any individual claiming false immunity, stand guilty as charged -and must be subjected to all the fines, penalties, and punishment -as so directed.
But, you must tell them this -at the time they make the statement of no jurisdiction or immunity. Record everything you say or do. NO known legal immunity has ever been known to exist within the confines of the United States.
You are fully backed up with an official U.S. codification code adopted and approved by Congress and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), known as; Title-15 (USC). This act supercedes any and all Judicial rulings when it comes to breaking the law, affecting the rights and liberties (Civil Rights), bestowed upon Citizens of the United States. When your rights have been violated by any part of government i.e.; Executive, Legislative, or Judicial, you have the unalienable right constitutionally, to act vehemently and let everyone know. If you’re WIMPY, you deserve what they hand you. You must be assertive, even to the point of going to jail. Jail is actually good, -for now they must (in open court with recordings &witnesses), prove you are absolutely wrong. They can’t! You got em! FACT!
p.s. CJC’s cannot supercede the constitution without an amendment approved by congress, when they violate civil rights. Contract Law; guaranteed by Article 1 Section 10 of the US Constitution. They automatically become null and void, regardless of their origin, but that fact must be related at that point in time, to whomever you’re addressing -or you lose. (Wimps!)
Thanks,Dr. D. Evan Jones,author: THE RAPING OF OUR NATION.