Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

"You Are Such a Warrior"

Expand Messages
  • JAIL4Judges
    You Are Such a Warrior From: gdebra91@aol.com [mailto:gdebra91@aol.com ] Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 7:59 PM To: JAIL4Judges
    Message 1 of 1 , May 30, 2008

      "You Are Such a Warrior"

      From: gdebra91@... [mailto:gdebra91@...]
      Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 7:59 PM
      To: JAIL4Judges
      Subject: Re: Going After Judges Minus J.A.I.L. is Spinning One's Wheels

      You are such a Warrior!  Give us the weapons and we will fight too!  Take care,


      Debra, thank you for your kind compliment for his work. The answer to your question is, your weapon is TRUTH!  "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free."  John 8:32. However People do not want to know the TRUTH or obey it!   Remember the movie, "A Few Good Men," in which Jack Nicolson shouted from the witness stand, "You want the truth? You can't handle the truth." Just so today! People can't handle the TRUTH!
      When the public is ready for freedom, they shall indeed have it poste haste. We have God's promise on that. Until then, they shall continue wondering and sinking in despair and frustration, ever seeking a remedy, and never finding it.  The Scripture teaches us that People are "Ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth." II Timothy 3:7. It is only by faith that we shall subdue kingdoms. "Who through faith subdued kingdoms, wrought righteousness, obtained promises, stopped the mouths of lions." Hebrews 11:33. "And let us not be weary in well doing: for in due season we shall reap, if we faint not." Galations 6:9.
      -Ron Branson
      *   *   *
      Going After Judges Minus J.A.I.L.
      is Spinning One's Wheels

      Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting
      different results.  - Albert Einstein

      From: Lcagee@... [
      Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 5:15 AM
      To: JAIL4Judges
      Subject: Re: Why Access to Grand Juries Are Being Blocked


      My experience in Vermont was very similar to Ron Branson's experience
      in California. When I tried to file a complaint against a judge, I was
      told to attend the judicial conduct hearings, which occur every 6
      years. I did attend, and was given all of 3 minutes to speak in a room
      crowded with lawyers anxious to take the podium and praise the fine
      judges. I was the last speaker. After I spoke for my 3 minutes, there
      was stunned silence. The only thing that happened after that was the
      moderator declaring the hearing adjourned.

      I then attended a session of the legislative committee on judicial
      performance. I entered a room with several legislators who spoke of
      administrative things. When I thought I might have my chance to speak,
      the meeting was adjourned.

      I went to the office of the AG to speak to him directly. I was told he
      would not meet with me, but I could write a letter.

      I wrote a letter outlining my grievances. The letter was forwarded to
      the judicial conduct board. I received a letter saying they would look
      into my complaint. Weeks went by, and no one contacted me to see my
      evidence or to speak with me. Then I received another letter telling me
      that a determination had been made that there was no evidence of
      wrongdoing, case closed. But no one had spoken to me. I didn't'

      Then I decided to go ahead and sue the judge in federal court. He was
      provided a lawyer by the state.  I was not provided a lawyer. The law
      firm that represented him now has one of the founding partners sitting
      on the US Congress (he ran on a platform of looking out for the little

      The lawsuit was filed, and his defense was, "I'm immune." They filed a
      motion to dismiss, and guess what? Dismissed. I filed a motion to
      reinstate and guess what? Denied. I filed an appeal to the Second
      Circuit Court. Guess what? Denied. I then appealed to the US Supreme
      court. Guess what? Denied.

      Each denial was based upon "absolute judicial immunity." I tried to
      point out that the judge helped a lawyer steal a huge sum of money from
      me. They didn't care. I tried to point out that the judge violated his
      sworn oath of office. They didn't mind.

      The week that my case was DISMISSED from the US Supreme court, I leaned
      that I was now "under investigation" by 2 state medical boards. This
      initiating party of this prosecution can be traced to the same building
      where the judge sits on the bench. Paperwork in my possession proved
      the judge and the lawyer who took my money both spoke to the prosecutor
      around the time this prosecution began.

      I am now unemployed. The lawyer referred to above recently participated
      in a foreclosure action against my home.

      Lawrence Agee, MD 

      PS. My original case involved a divorce after a 6 month marriage. The
      judge ignored my prenuptial agreement. What about my "right to
      contract" guaranteed by Article 1 Section 10 of the US Constitution?
      Don't judges take an oath to uphold the Constitution? Is this oath


      Why Access to Grand Juries
      Are Being Blocked
      By Ron Branson - J.A.I.L. CIC 

      Nancy Lazaryan, I have read of your below frustration, and I need to
      bring something to your attention regarding Grand Juries. Back in 1960
      the State of California created what has now become known as the
      Commission on Judicial Performance (CJP). This commissions have spread
      throughout the other 49 states as a "means" of discipling wayward

      In creating the CJP the "work" of the Grand Juries was "transferred" to
      the CJP. Prior to the creation of the CJP Grand Juries had the power to
      investigate all  political figures. However, since then, the one and
      only governmental entity that cannot now be investigated by the Grand
      Jury is the judiciary.

      I filed an affidavit for criminal conduct of a certain judge with the
      Los Angeles County Grand Jury. I thereafter received a letter from the
      Grand Jury stating that they did not have jurisdiction over the matter,
      and that I would have to go to the Commission on Judicial Performance.

      Indeed I did go personally to San Francisco, and was told that they are
      not a prosecuting agency, but deal only with ethical matters, and that
      I would have to go to the State Attorney General's Office. I drove from
      S.F. to the State Attorney General's Office in Sacramento where I was
      told they I would have to go to S.F. to the CJP.  I told them that I
      just came from them and they sent me here.

      Eventually they allowed me to see a Virgil Chapman, their P.R. man, who
      photocopied my evidence and told me that this evidence needs to be
      acted upon post haste.

      After a passage of time hearing nothing, I called to follow up. They
      made unmistaken acts to block my calls and told me they could no do

      Here is what I found out. The State Attorney General is defense counsel
      for the California judges, and could not prosecute. Bottom line, there
      exists no forum in which the People may file a criminal affidavit
      against a judge which may be investigated.

      This is why you cannot gain access to the Grand Jury. It is also why I
      wrote into the J.A.I.L. Initiative that the Special Grand Jury created
      by the Initiative shall not be subject to the laws imposed upon Grand
      Juries. J.A.I.L. returns the power back into the hands of the People in
      the form of a Special Grand Jury.

      - Ron Branson

    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.