Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

J.A.I.L. Is Unique!

Expand Messages
  • JAIL4Judges
    J.A.I.L. Is Unique! Several years ago we sent out a J.A.I.L. News Journal entitled J.A.I.L. is Absolutely Unique (See below). This title here is not to be
    Message 1 of 1 , Jun 26, 2007
    • 0 Attachment
      J.A.I.L. Is Unique!
      Several years ago we sent out a J.A.I.L. News Journal entitled "J.A.I.L. is Absolutely Unique" (See below). This title here is not to be confused with that JNJ. - Ron

      From: rcutting14@... [mailto:rcutting14@...]
      Sent: Monday, June 25, 2007 10:08 PM
      To: JAIL4Judges
      Subject: Re: Hi Ron or Barbie:
      Roberta Cutting states:
      I understand that J.A.I.L is unique and stands on its own, Barbie, but so does "Citizen's Against Legal and Moral Abuse."  I just thought we are all in this together for truth and justice and you would support our organization just like I would support yours.   
      There are no hard feelings, but I would like you to understand where I am coming from.  If you wouldn't allow a link on your site to mine, then I would not want to put a link of yours on my site as it just doesn't seem right that I would do that when you obviously would not support our efforts either.   
       I even went to J.A.I.L.'s rally in Bartow and helped out and even got a few signatures signed, but I feel sort of betrayed that you would not want the support to go both ways.   
      Thanks for writing and letting me know where you are coming from.

      Roberta, this is Ron Branson. Due to this common viewpoint of many others on this subject, I have deemed it appropriate for me to publicly deal with your concern, and in that regard, you can thank me for giving you the publicity you desire.
      You could not imagine the number of candidates and organizations that think of themselves as unique and worthy of J.A.I.L.'s promotion. I find myself as the leader of JAIL4Judges being made a point of contention mostly by political candidates, but also organizations, of unreasonably refusing to promote their campaign or cause. I am not referring to unknown people or organizations, but to my friends, those on whom I wish the best.
      I have become the object of contention by my doing nothing in involving myself in contested governors races and in bids for the office of president, or other causes. Perhaps I should be pleased that people deem my approval of them so important. But the fact still remains, I cannot allow J.A.I.L to become diffused into diverse fronts. If I am to be condemned for so taking such a stand, so be it. This is nothing personal against you, or anyone, it is just a position that just has to be.
      My experiences go back many years to the end of the 70's. I have attended thousands of seminars, meetings, speakers on most every subject under heaven, and have collected volumes of materials on everything that have accumulated in stacks along the walls. Many of the famous speakers and leaders are gone - that is - they are no longer with us on earth. What my past experiences have done is inform me on the problems that our country is facing, and I thank God for such an education.
      As with most anyone, eventually, I reached a saturation point at which no more known truth would excite me as to prospects of a remedy to the problem. Indeed, I found myself to have to hold my peace when I wanted to ask the speakers, "So now that we know the problem as you have described, what is the solution?" When I have indeed asked, I would watch them squirm for a response like, "Write your congressman," or those magical two words as the "solution" to all problems, "sue 'em."
      You may consider it arrogance on my part, but I am past all that. If there is one fact over the years that I found to be consistent among the "conservative movement" for lack of another title, it is that they can never get focused on anything. I liken it unto one firing a shotgun full of salt - they hit everything, and affect nothing. They can peel the paint off all of the walls, but the wall itself is unphased.
      This factor overwhelmed me to the point that I determined that something had to be done that absolutely no one else was doing, and that I had to focus upon that, and nothing else. It is because of that position, I often face criticism. I am told that I now deem myself "King of the Hill," I am "living on my own island," I think that I am "better than everyone else," I believe "I have the only answer," I "refuse to work with anyone else," I am a "separatist, and cooperate with no one else," etc. Roberta, I have had to make myself impervious to what others may think about me in this regard.
      But ironically, if I am indeed so evil and so egotistical, why in the world would anyone want or seek the blessings and endorsement of J.A.I.L? If such were the case, you would think that everyone would like to stay as far away from J.A.I.L. as possible, lest they be tainted with the likes of J.A.I.L. The attention of Ron Branson would be as desirous as leprosy. But that is not the case, as you yourself give evidence to. Why would you want Citizens Against Legal and Moral Abuse to be pulled down by J.A.I.L? Obviously, you believe that J.A.I.L.'s endorsement of CALMA would be a great benefit to you and your organization, and I agree with your position. Indeed, as I say, you can give praise to the LORD for my using your present communication as a springboard to all who hear or benefit from this message.
      Now let me deal with some of the particulars of your communication. You say that you thought we were all in this together and would be able to work together. At this present time, I have nothing against CALMA. I presently know of nothing by which I might condemn your efforts. But that is true with any number of other efforts.
      You must understand that if J.A.I.L. were to link to everyone else's efforts, it would become merely a clearinghouse for everyone's cause. You do not have to link to us if it is not in your heart to do so. But thousands have already done so. By typing "jail4judges" in Google it will reveal thousands of references to J.A.I.L. and quotes galore to your heart's content. Yet not a one has been paid or asked to be linked to us. Every link to www.jail4judges.org is totally voluntary.
      Now this is not to say that I am against paid advertisement, paid staff, or even a salary for myself. I have to deal with reality - the financing is not there. Perhaps one day I will be able to say that I have been paid for my labor, and that we have paid advertisement. But does this not reveal an amazing phenomenon? We have grown throughout the United States and have operations in every state. We reach most every media source in the nation, and are in high demand. I have been  called to appear on national television to rebut a former United States Supreme Court Justice. J.A.I.L. is the subject of several states' 2007 State of the Judiciary messages. When you mention the name JAIL4Judges most anywhere, people have at least heard of us. There is no doubt that J.A.I.L. has become a common national movement in this country, and yet without any measurable financial support. That is absolutely amazing! I think you would admit to that!
      No, Roberta, I am not sitting here lonely on my own island with no friends or no attention, disjoined from everyone as captain of my own hill. J.A.I.L. is for everyone, everywhere and at all times, and in all circumstances. It is so fundamental to truth and righteousness that it should have existed 230 years ago during the time of our Founding Fathers when they wrote the Constitution. It is like the Declaration of Independence for this current corrupt age.
      And further, J.A.L.L. is about Amendments to our States' Constitutions. Amendments do not get behind organizations, rather organizations get behind amendments. Is such an Amendment Republican, or is it Democrat? Is it third party? What organizations do Amendments advance?  Yea, it is like high-tide that raises all ships, and benefits no one's ship in particular.
      So Roberta, I trust you have grasped what I have just said. J.A.I.L. just is! It is not dependent on any other cause, nor can it be.  God bless you.
      -Ron Branson

      J.A.I.L. News Journal
      Los Angeles, California                                         September 28, 2003

      J.A.I.L. Absolutely Unique
      (By Ron Branson, Author/Founder)
      "I believe trial by jury is the only anchor yet imagined by man which can hold a government to the principles of its constitution."
      Perhaps no man influenced the infrastructure of the foundations of our new experiment known as a Constitutional Republic in America more so than did Thomas Jefferson. America history is rife with quotes of him, the above being no exception. Jefferson has received praise from all walks of life, and statues have been erected to him, including the Jefferson Memorial in Washington, D.C. There are even those who proclaim themselves to be "Jeffersonians."
      After the order of Thomas Jefferson, and our other Founding Fathers, two-hundred and nineteen years later, (April, 1995),  J.A.I.L. ("Judicial Accountability & Integrity Legislation") has come into existence on the American scene. While not yet recognized for its full value, it is as important as our original Constitution itself.
      Now while some of you are picking yourself up from the floor where you have been laying and holding your chest while gasping for air, let me explain. There is absolutely no competition between the U.S. Constitution and J.A.I.L., for neither can be complete without the other. I know some of you are saying, "These are hard words," while others murmur "Treason," noting that our country has existed for over 200 years without the existence of J.A.I.L., and so we have.
      But the fact remains, unless you have been living on another planet, that our Constitution, after 200 years of existence, has been reduced to just a piece of paper given political lip service, cited as authority only when it serves one's political agenda. All government officials, in theory, give solemn oath to it, pledging to uphold and defend it against all enemies, foreign and domestic, while few of these people have ever read it in their life, and even fewer understand it.
      Thomas Jefferson said, "Let no more be heard of confidence in men, but rather bind them down by the chains of the Constitution."  Most politicians accept the idea, as adopted by many judges in our courts today, that our Constitution was intended by our Founding Fathers to be rubberized, and those links of "chains to bind them down," spoken of  by Thomas Jefferson, are made of elastic.
      In the quote of Thomas Jefferson above, "I believe trial by jury is the only anchor yet imagined by man which can hold a government to the principles of its constitution," we note that the intent of Jefferson's words was holding government to the principles of the Constitution. He said, "I believe trial by jury is the only anchor yet imagined by man, and in 1776, he was correct. But then came along J.A.I.L. two centuries later as "another anchor imagined by man to hold government to the principles of the Constitution!" 
      In the days of Thomas Jefferson, he had a limited knowledge of options, and based thereon, he determined that a trial by jury was the only anchor imagined by man to hold government to the principles of the Constitution. Had Thomas Jefferson then been enlightened to the concept of J.A.I.L., notwithstanding its current title, history would doubtless record Thomas Jefferson as the author of J.A.I.L.
      In fact, even in his day, Thomas Jefferson, disappointed in the lack of a provision in our current Constitution, was searching for some Constitutional measure, such as J.A.I.L., that would result in judicial accountability of judges. He said, "At the establishment of our Constitutions, the judiciary bodies were supposed to be the most helpless and harmless members of the government. Experience, however, soon showed us in what way they were to become the most dangerous; that the insufficiency of the means provided for their removal gave them a freehold and irresponsibility in office; that their decisions, seeming to concern individual suitors only, pass silent and unheeded by the public at large; that these decisions, nevertheless, become law by precedent, sapping little and little, the foundations of the Constitution, before anyone perceived that invisible and helpless worm had been busily employed in consuming its substance. In truth, man is not made to be trusted for life, if secured against all liability to account."
      In the founding of our country, and in the providence of God Almighty working in hearts of our Founding Fathers, the revelation of J.A.I.L. was not yet to be revealed. But now in this generation, God, according to the good pleasure of His will, has chosen to reveal the concept of J.A.I.L. to this, and other nations.
      Above I stated that J.A.I.L. was equally as important as is the original Constitution itself. How so? you say. It was Thomas Jefferson himself that expressed the lack of a means of security of the very Constitution he had a part in writing, stating that he feared the politically motivated Judiciary Industry would completely undermine the Constitution until it became just a worthless piece of paper.
      Thomas Jefferson warned us as surely as if it were printed in today's newspapers,  "...the Federal Judiciary; an irresponsible body (for impeachment is scarcely a scare-crow), working like gravity by night and by day, gaining a little today and a little tomorrow, and advancing it's noiseless step like a thief, over the field of jurisdiction, until all shall be usurped from the States, and the government of all be consolidated into one. ... when all government ... in little as in great things, shall be drawn to Washington as the centre of all power, it will render powerless the checks provided of one government on another and will become as venal and oppressive as the government from which we separated." -- Thomas Jefferson, 1821.
      So, we arrive at the question, which is of the greater value, the preservation of the principles of our original Constitution, or the means by which it is protected?  They are inseparable, and neither can exist without the other. As a practical matter, everyone should respect the existence of J.A.I.L. as if it were authored by Thomas Jefferson himself, and I believe he would have been delighted to have his name associated with it. I realize it is hard to conceive of a document outside of the Constitution that is so important as is our Constitution itself, but God has now brought to light the revelation of J.A.I.L. to this nation, and calls upon America to support it for its very future's sake.
      There are many groups, organizations, political parties, and coalitions with their own agendas throughout America which pay little or no attention to J.A.I.L. This does not concern me in the least, for I know by the Grace of God, one of these days all these causes will have to reckon with the validity of the value of J.A.I.L. being equal to that of our Constitution itself, and in that day we will have the opportunity to move in unity for the restitution of the government envisioned by Thomas Jefferson.
      *   *   *

      No virus found in this outgoing message.
      Checked by AVG Free Edition.
      Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.9.8/869 - Release Date: 6/25/2007 5:32 PM

    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.